<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Public Option Less Robust Is A Double Slap In The Face To Working Class Americans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/</link>
	<description>Politics for liberal newsgeeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 05:37:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OutWest</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57084</link>
		<dc:creator>OutWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57084</guid>
		<description>Yes it is beautiful. Besides, we all know that cold makes you more liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is beautiful. Besides, we all know that cold makes you more liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selise</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57058</link>
		<dc:creator>selise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57058</guid>
		<description>i live in MA. i agree, it&#039;s almost the same plan. when (what year) did you first hear about it? thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i live in MA. i agree, it&#8217;s almost the same plan. when (what year) did you first hear about it? thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: formidable</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57045</link>
		<dc:creator>formidable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57045</guid>
		<description>Okaaayyyyy . . . so the fascists have been in charge of healthcare since, ohhh 1946, and the Prez isn&#039;t moving fast enuf for some posters here . . .

Geeeejuhzusfuhhhkinchrist, people, smoke somethin&#039; will ya and slow down a bit, or have a glass of wine or whateverrrrr -- give the guy a break!

The Prez likes to take the 3-pointers, so chill.  We&#039;re gonna get there -- stop sounding like the kiddies over at Fauxnewz, all the time whining and peeing in their pants.

Jane, I love ya, but you gotta go long sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okaaayyyyy . . . so the fascists have been in charge of healthcare since, ohhh 1946, and the Prez isn&#8217;t moving fast enuf for some posters here . . .</p>
<p>Geeeejuhzusfuhhhkinchrist, people, smoke somethin&#8217; will ya and slow down a bit, or have a glass of wine or whateverrrrr &#8212; give the guy a break!</p>
<p>The Prez likes to take the 3-pointers, so chill.  We&#8217;re gonna get there &#8212; stop sounding like the kiddies over at Fauxnewz, all the time whining and peeing in their pants.</p>
<p>Jane, I love ya, but you gotta go long sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57033</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57033</guid>
		<description>More than 20 of the Democrats on that list are from very strong Democratic Districts. I wish the people in those Districts all knew about this. They could call up and give their opinion.

http://jwalkerreport.blogspot.com/2009/10/whip-count-data-removed-by-hill.html

http://www.progressivepunch.org/members.jsp?chamber=House</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 20 of the Democrats on that list are from very strong Democratic Districts. I wish the people in those Districts all knew about this. They could call up and give their opinion.</p>
<p><a href="http://jwalkerreport.blogspot.com/2009/10/whip-count-data-removed-by-hill.html" rel="nofollow">http://jwalkerreport.blogspot.com/2009/10/whip-count-data-removed-by-hill.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.progressivepunch.org/members.jsp?chamber=House" rel="nofollow">http://www.progressivepunch.org/members.jsp?chamber=House</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmull</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57028</link>
		<dc:creator>bmull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57028</guid>
		<description>&quot;t. r. reid said that the po was used as a bargaining chip to get the insurance companies to agree to community rating, gauranteed issue, etc&quot;

This is not correct. The plan Obama is proposing is almost identical to a plan that health insurers have been trying to get passed for years. Everything in it makes them more money. I first heard about it when I worked at one of these companies. When I saw Obama&#039;s plan I was like, OMG! It&#039;s the SAME plan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;t. r. reid said that the po was used as a bargaining chip to get the insurance companies to agree to community rating, gauranteed issue, etc&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not correct. The plan Obama is proposing is almost identical to a plan that health insurers have been trying to get passed for years. Everything in it makes them more money. I first heard about it when I worked at one of these companies. When I saw Obama&#8217;s plan I was like, OMG! It&#8217;s the SAME plan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmull</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57026</link>
		<dc:creator>bmull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57026</guid>
		<description>&quot;this is all a cover to slash Medicare. When I was preparing my entry on Obamacare, I noticed that Obama often railed against how much entitlements took up of the federal budget. He came across to me as your typical whining conservative pol who saw every dollar going to entitlements as one less he could spend on important stuff like stupid, unnecessary wars or aid for banksters.&quot;

BINGO! I&#039;ve been saying this for months. If you follow the money in Obama&#039;s plan, the savings come out of Medicare and transferring the cost of the uninsured from industry and government back to the public. It is nothing but a backdoor entitlement cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;this is all a cover to slash Medicare. When I was preparing my entry on Obamacare, I noticed that Obama often railed against how much entitlements took up of the federal budget. He came across to me as your typical whining conservative pol who saw every dollar going to entitlements as one less he could spend on important stuff like stupid, unnecessary wars or aid for banksters.&#8221;</p>
<p>BINGO! I&#8217;ve been saying this for months. If you follow the money in Obama&#8217;s plan, the savings come out of Medicare and transferring the cost of the uninsured from industry and government back to the public. It is nothing but a backdoor entitlement cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starbuck</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-57018</link>
		<dc:creator>Starbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-57018</guid>
		<description>Taken one at a time, yes you can see their bias. But the majority of Congress as a whole? Or is it hole?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taken one at a time, yes you can see their bias. But the majority of Congress as a whole? Or is it hole?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann in AZ</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-56981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann in AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-56981</guid>
		<description>Jane has a fresh &lt;a href=&quot;http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/is-blanche-lincoln-against-taxpayer-funded-insurance-for-big-ag-too/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cross-post available&lt;/a&gt;: “Is Blanche Lincoln Against Taxpayer-Funded Insurance For Big Ag, Too?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jane has a fresh <a href="http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/is-blanche-lincoln-against-taxpayer-funded-insurance-for-big-ag-too/" rel="nofollow">cross-post available</a>: “Is Blanche Lincoln Against Taxpayer-Funded Insurance For Big Ag, Too?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coral</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-56977</link>
		<dc:creator>coral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-56977</guid>
		<description>Insurance is out of reach for many Americans and a mandate is not going to change that. The only thing that will help is drastically reduced monthly payments. 

It now costs between $250 and $650 per month to insure a healthy young adult, losing her parent&#039;s insurance coverage. I know, I&#039;ve been researching costs for my daughter, age 23. She moved to NYC after graduating this year, living hand to mouth, with bunch of roommates, working a patchwork quilt of unpaid internships and low-pay part-time or short-time (3-4 month) positions in film industry. We can&#039;t afford to pay insurance for her, and there is nothing she can afford, what with college loan payments to start next month, and basic food, rent &amp; transportation. Especially since the lower-cost plans cover little or nothing until you&#039;ve already spent between $1200 and $3000 on your own (and that doesn&#039;t include the premiums). 

How young families who don&#039;t get employer coverage manage to be covered, I have no idea.

Americans desperately need an administration and Congress that understands the dire straits that many in the middle and lower-middle income quintiles are in. We need more jobs, higher wages, more job security, and some kind of guaranteed minimum health insurance for those who are struggling, but still earn or own too much to be covered by Medicaid.

This latest move by Lieberman is infuriating, but I expected no less of him. I did, however, expect a heck of a lot more fight from Obama on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insurance is out of reach for many Americans and a mandate is not going to change that. The only thing that will help is drastically reduced monthly payments. </p>
<p>It now costs between $250 and $650 per month to insure a healthy young adult, losing her parent&#8217;s insurance coverage. I know, I&#8217;ve been researching costs for my daughter, age 23. She moved to NYC after graduating this year, living hand to mouth, with bunch of roommates, working a patchwork quilt of unpaid internships and low-pay part-time or short-time (3-4 month) positions in film industry. We can&#8217;t afford to pay insurance for her, and there is nothing she can afford, what with college loan payments to start next month, and basic food, rent &amp; transportation. Especially since the lower-cost plans cover little or nothing until you&#8217;ve already spent between $1200 and $3000 on your own (and that doesn&#8217;t include the premiums). </p>
<p>How young families who don&#8217;t get employer coverage manage to be covered, I have no idea.</p>
<p>Americans desperately need an administration and Congress that understands the dire straits that many in the middle and lower-middle income quintiles are in. We need more jobs, higher wages, more job security, and some kind of guaranteed minimum health insurance for those who are struggling, but still earn or own too much to be covered by Medicaid.</p>
<p>This latest move by Lieberman is infuriating, but I expected no less of him. I did, however, expect a heck of a lot more fight from Obama on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernDragon</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/10/28/making-public-option-less-robust-is-a-double-slap-in-the-face-to-working-class-americans/#comment-56969</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/?p=3858#comment-56969</guid>
		<description>The problem is they don&#039;t see it as peril.  They really believe that the money they get from corporations translates directly into votes, that the ads that money buys will be enough to overcome any challenge.  In 2010 we need to show them the fallacy of that line of thought.  A couple who really get hammered and thrown out of office might, repeat might, wake some others up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is they don&#8217;t see it as peril.  They really believe that the money they get from corporations translates directly into votes, that the ads that money buys will be enough to overcome any challenge.  In 2010 we need to show them the fallacy of that line of thought.  A couple who really get hammered and thrown out of office might, repeat might, wake some others up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.209 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-18 00:02:52 -->

