The Hill is reporting that Mike Ross is “suggesting” opening Medicare to all:
Ross (D-Ark.), who had emerged as a leader among centrist Blue Dog Democrats opposing the public health insurance option, has suggested something his colleagues consider even more drastic – opening Medicare to those under 65 without insurance.
Sounds like a dramatic about face for a man who fought diligently to make the public option less like Medicare. Ross bragged about killing the possibility of single payer, Medicare for all. He once pushed hard for the trigger. He worked secretly with Sen. Kent Conrad to try to replace the public option with worthless co-ops. Opening Medicare for all would be a dramatic flip-flop for Ross, but it is not. You see, the problem is Mike Ross does not even support his own suggestion.
“Let me be clear,” Ross said in his statement, “I do not endorse this idea, as it was just one of many ideas we, as legislators, have brought up and discussed in the numerous, ongoing negotiations and discussions we have had on healthcare reform over the past several months.”
Way to be super unhelpful Mike. The final bill should be on the House floor within a week or two, now is not the time to brainstorm ideas that you’re not even sure you can support. Suggesting alternatives that can’t even secure your own vote is a waste of everyone’s time.
The Hill may have given some coverage to your transparent attempt to sound progressive, but the grassroots community won’t fall for your posturing. If you want to be in the good graces of the Democratic bases, do what they overwhelmingly want. Don’t stand with the insurance companies, vote for the real health care reform with a public option, like 74% of Democrats in your district want.



6 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Isn’t Mike’s play here to make up with the lefties by supporting hr676 once it is deemed unpassable?
This is what they’re all doing, it seems. The classic case was Rockefeller’s speech before the Finance Committee Vote last week. Everybody’s willing to promote what the insurance companies hate as long as it has no chance of passing.
The same thing is going on with the Banking regulation bills. Everybody’s for more regulation… the question is just new department or same old regulators newly empowered… except we aren’t mentioning that regulating derivatives is off the table …
Jon,
I’m going to foolishly take this as a good sign that things really are going our way in the House – if the opposite were true, this nitwit would be backslappin’ and a boastin’
I don’t get what he is saying… here is an idea, now I do not endorse it…but its an idea.
Here is another idea… a hot air ballon for every 6 year old in the USA – now I do not endorse the idea…but its an idea.
Is this some odd twisted “price” he is paying for Bubba coming to stump for him? Makes them both look like Dum Dum’s.
This smells like the very soul of the centrist DLC. Clinton and Ross, deflecting criticism by saying sweet nothings and talking out both sides of their mouth.
Just keep wondering if the Yellow Dogs will vote against 62% of the American people
he’s a first string dumb ass who has confused all that room-to-move Steny and Rahm afforded him with actual influence and power. now he wants a do-over for fundraisin’ purposes
Two Christmases !