h/t nirbao
As a pastor, I am well aware of how health care policy affects ordinary people. At the denominational level, religious leaders are equally aware, and have been pushing Congress to deal with real reform.
Most media outlets, however, are deaf to these voices, as the TradMed seems to always reduce religion in public life to the issue of abortion. But group after group has been speaking out on health care reform, often for many years, and sending their advocates to make their views known in DC as well.
For example, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA – my denomination) adopted a social statement on health and health care in 2003, and reiterated one of that statement’s central propositions this in a resolution overwhelmingly adopted this past August:
RESOLVED, that the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, in Assembly, commit this church in all of its expressions to the premise that “each person should have ready access to basic health care services that include preventive, acute, and chronic physical and mental health care at an affordable cost” (page 13); and be it therefore further RESOLVED, that this assembly request that the ELCA Washington Office, in partnership with the synods, congregations and members of the ELCA, convey the urgency and sense of this resolution to Congress and the White House.
Did this get reported in the TradMed? Not that I could see. They were more interested in following the teapartiers and reporting on the sexuality debates.
Similarly, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has likewise adopted statements on health care over the years, that include positions like these:
Every person has a basic right to adequate health care. The right flows fr0m the sanctity of human life and the dignity that belongs to all human persons, who are made in the image of God. It implies that access to that health care which is necessary and suitable for the proper development and maintenance of life must be provided for all people, regardless of economic, social or legal status. Special attention should be given to meeting the basic health needs of the poor. With increasingly limited resources in the economy, it is the basic rights of the poor that are frequently threatened first. (Health and Health Care, 1981, pdf pp. 9-10)
Our approach to health care is shaped by a simple but fundamental principle: “Every person has a right to adequate health care. The right flows from the sanctity of human life and the dignity that belongs to all human persons, who are made in the image of God.” Health care is more than a commodity; it is a basic human right, an essential safeguard of human life and dignity. We believe our people’s health care should not depend on where they work, how much their parents earn, or where they live. Our constant teaching that each human life must be protected and human dignity promoted leads us to insist that all people have a right to health care. . .
For three quarters of a century, the Catholic bishops of the United States have called for national action to assure decent health care for all Americans. . . [A Framework for Comprehensive Health Care Reform, 1993, pdf p. 3]
Now is the time for real health care reform. It is a matter of fundamental justice. For so many, it is literally a matter of life and death, of lives cut short, and dignity denied. . . [A Framework, pdf p. 6]
(Richard MacBrien had more on Roman Catholic teachings on health care reform last week at the National Catholic Reporter.)
The United Methodist Church’s 2004 Book of Discipline includes this:
Health is a condition of physical, mental, social, and spiritual well-being, and we view it as a responsibility—public and private. Health care is a basic human right. Psalm 146 speaks of the God “who executes justice for the oppressed;/ who gives food to the hungry./ The LORD sets the prisoners free;/ the LORD opens the eyes of the blind.” The right to health care includes care for persons with brain diseases, neurological conditions or physical disabilities, who must be afforded the same access to health care as all other persons in our communities. It is unjust to construct or perpetuate barriers to physical or mental wholeness or full participation in community.
In 2000, the UMC adopted a major resolution on health care, which reads in part:
Therefore, be it resolved, that The United Methodist Church expressly adopt the claim of health care as a “basic human right” and that this claim be the hallmark of our United Methodist efforts in this area of advocacy; and
Be it further resolved, that The United Methodist Church now demands health care as a basic human right and as an entitlement for all Americans, including Native Americans, and legal resident aliens; and
Be it further resolved, that The United Methodist Church will exert its influence in any arena and wherever possible to bring about substantive change in the health care system, respecting the hallmark of health care as a “basic human right”; and
Be it further resolved, that compassion and healing be the primary motivation in developing a health care system that is just and inclusive and recognizing this, The United Methodist Church now calls for implementation of a totally nonprofit health care insurance system, a single-payer system administered by the federal government;
For more than 60 years, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) General Assemblies have been calling for reform of the U.S. health system, urging the establishment of a national medical plan that will ensure health coverage for all persons residing in the United States. The most recent General Assembly (2008) “endorse[d] in principle the provision of single-payer universal health care reform in which health care services are privately provided and publicly financed … as the program that best responds to the moral imperative of the gospel.” [Minutes, 2008, p. 1133]
The Mennonite Church USA reaffirmed a 2007 statement of health care policy principles at their 2009 convention, which includes this:
We also call upon the U.S. Congress to support bipartisan legislation that assures access without barriers to affordable, basic, quality healthcare for all. Specifically, we urge Congress to:
Support a healthcare system in which risks, costs and responsibility are shared by all
There is enough for all, if all share healthcare resources, recognize limits and seek to be caretakers of health. We can learn from the experience of countries with exemplary records of assuring access and controlling costs. In these countries, healthcare is seen as a human or social right that helps bind a society together. Those with means help to shoulder the cost for those without, and costs are controlled with cooperative bargaining power.
The Muslim American Society, just a couple of weeks ago:
The political contest is heated, and often uncivil, yet Muslim physicians, national leaders, and civil rights leaders are united by two points of agreement: first, that health care is a human right – not a commodity; and second, that the tenets of the Islamic faith compel Muslims to work for social justice and compassion, which means, in the context of this political issue, universal health care in the United States.
“This crucial issue involving health care moves beyond mere public policy. Universal health care is both a moral and spiritual imperative and must be recognized as a fundamental right for everyone,” stated MAS Freedom Executive Director, Mahdi Bray.
These are samples of religious communities trying to speak out and be heard when it comes to health care reform. As I wrote last week, the parable of the Good Samaritan is a strong challenge to any who would see someone in need of health care but would pass them by without offering assistance — and religious group after group is stepping up to meet that challenge.
In stark contrast to views of the Baucus Caucus, the overall message from many religious leaders and communities is clear: health care is a basic right, not a commodity, and society as a whole needs to develop mechanisms to make this right a reality for all in our midst, from the least to the greatest.
It’s amazing that the some of the most overtly religious in Congress seem to be the most resistant to this message.





30 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Even the Democrats in DC only give lip service to issues of social justice and human rights. This is probably because those that work for these issues are not walking around with brief cases full of campaign cash. If you want the ear of DC and the TradMed you must be a wealthy powerful industry, a wealthy powerful lobby, or have the goods to blackmail your legislator.
Howdy Rev,
found Faithful Reform dot org late last week and was wondering why this fabulous alliance wasn’t being used much by any of the players in this fight. sent it along to the principles over at POP
and yes, ELCA is a member as are all the other groups mentioned in your post save the Mennonites
Indeed, I have not yet been able buy ‘a quarter pound of wellness’ at my local shops, which suggests that putting health care in a ‘for profit’, market-based system is illogical.
Thanks, Peterr
you know peterr, I’ve been wondering how Christian chapters even throw in with republicans, while I understand there are some corrupt people who run some of them I was certain the majority of christian chapters believed the writings of the savior
we need to get more posts like these up
thanx
crikey !
principals
healthcare is a human right. from the pnhp blog:
if we really believe this, then the dems current approach to health care reform is completely unacceptable because it does not even provide for universal health insurance let alone universal healthcare. instead we need a program of “everybody in, nobody out” for comprehensive healthcare.
You are only religious to the MSM if you are a talibangelical. Everyone else is simply inauthentic.
Excellent research!
I note the absence of a quote from the Southern Baptist Convention. You can look at this site to get the views of Richard Land: he tells us we need to do it the republican way.
You’re welcome.
There’s lots of room to debate what will best work to “develop mechanisms to make this right a reality for all in our midst.”
But to consciously design or protect a system that privileges the profits of certain private industries at the expense of this those who lack this basic right is intolerable.
Bold mine…
Am I misreading that or did he just contradict himself within like three sentences of each other? LOL, not that I wouldn’t expect that from a right winger, but dayam, within three sentences????
Yeah, I saw that as I was looking for denominational statements. Surprise, surprise. The much more conservative branch of Lutherans, the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, is much the same.
thank you peterr. love the quotes. didn’t know that the presbyterians and umc had even specified single payer. i’m very glad to know that. and good for them.
Thank you! Glad to read this. It is heartening.
Moore’s capitalism movie has some corporate ass-kicking priests speaking out.
45,000 dying a year prematurely. The latest statistic for collateral damage from the industrial corporate complex. American karma… now we are collateral damage and the second America, the privileged gated community, becomes a smaller and tighter but still avaricious group. All the more avaricious.
For congress I say, you got down with dogs you got up with fleas trying to what M Moore calls “regulating evil”. Why does 30 cents of each health care dollar have to go to gratuitous convoluted paperwork for clerks, accountants and hospitals and doctors, and to go to advertising disinformation and to go for obscene salaries of insurance and pharma execs?
All over the newshour tonight they are pleading for simplification. Simplification? Single Payer HR 676 is 38 pages long and is humane and sane and actually fiscally conservative.
Except single payer is too simple and too humane to be feasible and pragmatic in the amoral profit-greedy climate. The fix is in. Obama and Congress have all that juicy bribe money. Max Baucus. What kabuki is he playing at in his indignation. Why Baucus?
Moore’s movie was especially sad because I heard his despair over the moral imbecility of the congress. He left the President alone, though nailed Dems like Dodd. Maybe because he had hope for Obama when production ended.
As for Obama, we got tossed crumbs from a deaf Bush, now we are begging and watching Obama arrange and negotiate for CROUTONS. But wonder if it will end up Trojan croutons, really poisoned even smaller crumbs?
When is America going to demand what it deserves, rather than ALWAYS struggling for the lesser of two evils?
Insurance and Pharma vendors corrupted the system. There is a renewable system and it is single payer. Why not Everybody In, Nobody Out. Fire the vendors. Medicare is set up. The VA program. Expand the systems to all. Lower the age from 65 to 0. Take the good people who worked in health care and put them to work there in the new system. Sorry the fat cats lose their billions. Will all the millions of bribe money, billions, can you imagine the payoff they are gunning for when all is said and done????? They will teach citizens to demand reform. Get greater punishment.
$700 billion charity to the top 1% who wrecked our economy.
Moore, Sheehan, Nader. It must be awesomely frustrating to be so committed as messengers and watch the American sheeple and their learned helplessness led by a President who is either corrupt or another victim of learned helplessness. And a Congress that drinks koolaid that wipes out empathy.
After the down and dirty stuff happening even now with insurance assault, Single Payer is still dismissed as windmill-tilting by the pragmatists. Which is still a BIG issue I have with my fellow progressives.
Favorite image of Capitalism movie, Moore running around with yellow crime scene tape encircling NYC edifices with it, with the security guards in the lobby shaking their heads.
Sorry for riffing so long.
Don’t be. I can get longwinded too, but I read and agreed with every word of it.
So how many voters do all the churches that support Healthcare claim?
Your right he logically made a claim and then disputed his own claim in three sentences a Jesuit this man is not.
And a Bishop too:)
My non denominational church with aout 2,500 definitely supports the public option.
I live in a small town, very conservative.
The hundreds of Catholic hospitals are by far their largest investment in the United States. So you needn’t ask why official Church teaching is contradicted by their current silence about health care. And you needn’t embarass them by bringing it up.
Greed has won in America. Dante’s Seven Deadly Sins (see Inferno) have evolved to become our [right wing’s) Seven Wonderous Virtues. Greed, Gluttony, Lust, Envy, Wrath, Pride, and Sloth are no longer evil and destructive, they’ve become the essence of America herself, buttressed of course by the eternal quest for Profit, Power, and Hegemon.
TS Eliot read the tea leaves and in 1925 described us:
We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar …
How sad it all is.
If you prize your mental health, avoid the comments.
What’s truly funny (in the ironic sense of funny) is that Baptists fled Europe for the New World to escape persecution as heretics. Their particular heresy? They believed that all Church members are competent to interpret the Scripture for themselves.
Don’t be trying to read, understand and interpret Scripture for yourself in today’s Southern Baptist Convention. This leads to the SBC being very reliable for unintended laughs when they have to apply pretzel logic to make Scripture coincide with their preconceptions.
Kudos to ELCA for doing another right thing!
When DOESN’T the media cover religious groups? When they do something progressive!
Ghandhi, one of the most influential voices of modern social and political activism, considered “Commerce with out morality” to be one of the seven traits that is spiritually perilous to all of humanity. And the insurance industry, engaged as they are, in profits ahead of patients (or put another way “medical depraved indifference to life”) are the current poster child for his assertion. And if one knows their bible, Jesus admonished His followers with the following words “Whatever you do to the least of these, so you do to me.” (Mathew 25:40)
So, who else but our faith based activists could put the moral issue so clearly before us? Thank you. I for one was very glad to read this.
Thanks OFG! :) Sorry to riff and run. Glad I caught this. Hard to mobilize with any heart fighting for the lesser of evils, watching a “change” President assert that he is focusing on the status quo for citizens as a cover to really placate corrupt system. I dread that he will give away the store and criminalize the uninsured to boost profits for industrial medical complex for the price of having pre-existing condition rule waived he can at the end of the day wave around like a victory flag. A Faustian contract.
Let’s hear it for stand up heroes!
TCU, Helmsley, CEO of UnitedHealth, made $57,000 a day last year. A day! 45,000 a year dying prematurely and that fat cat is getting $57,000 a day, and Congress is fighting to keep those fat cats in the gravy. They (corporate medical industries) spent $51 million in campaign contributions in 2007, $191 million to lobbyists who targeted key Committee Congresspeople. (according to nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics)
To late to speak now, they voted Republican or they would have already had healthcare. I love these churchies who stick their two cents in at all the wrong times.
The Catholic Priests told My Aunt after the doctors told Her not to try and have any more babies, that it didn’t matter if She died, she had to keep having babies. They didn’t give a shit about Her healthcare, her life, only more babies.
It is time for a public option. How insurance companies was ever allowed to develop as a for-profit industry is unimaginable. Profiting off of individuals’ health is not something we should be proud of as a country.
We were recently ranked as #37 by the World Health Organization compared to other nations. http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107
This is simply unacceptable. In a country with as much money, technology, and industry as we have, we still cannot find a way to offer health services to everyone.
Thanks for your thoughts. I appreciate the perspective of clergy “on the ground” who know that this debate comes down to real live human beings and whether or not they can get the care they need. I know that the ELCA has been working closely with other faith groups and denominations to make sure that health reform legislation includes strong affordability protections for families. One of these groups – PICO – just launched a website that lifts up stories from their congregations. http://www.icareforhealthcare.org. Real stories from real people. Our elected officials need to know that we’ll measure them by how well they find real solutions now to problems affecting millions of Americans like those featured in this website.