Here’s an interesting catch this morning. The group, Americans For Stable Quality Care, which is a PhRMA-backed group along with AMA, Families USA, and the Federation of American Hospitals, is running ads like these below:
The ad itself pushes support of the White House health care plan, and the Baucus Senate Finance Committee bill by providing links to both the White House and the Senate Finance Committee. It interestingly enough doesn’t mention H.R. 3200, the House health care bill. Could it be because that House bill contains a provision from Rep. Henry Waxman which would allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices? The ad also does not mention a public option as one of the factors in lowering costs of health care premiums.
The Americans For Stable Quality Care also incidentally tried to peddle their crap over at Dailykos, which was an ill-fated effort when people over there were quick to their game:
Your language will keep seniors and other Medicare Part D recipients in the doughnut hole for a longer period of time than they are now. 50% the cost of unaffordable drugs is still unaffordable for people on fixed incomes (which is the vast majority of Medicare recipients). People will still be choosing between their prescription medications and paying the rent or eating.
Byetta is over $5000 a month. How affordable is that to someone in the doughnut hole, even at 50%? Yet there are many diabetics who use it, and it’s really effective.
If you stand for genuine reform, come back to the table. $80 billion over ten years is chicken feed compared to your profits. A 50% reduction is little help in purchasing some of the more effective (and expensive) medications. Come back with something that will make a big difference to the little guys.
And they were directly questioned from me:
Why are you trying to kill the Waxman amendment to negotiate drug prices for Medicare by having Members in the House ask the committee chairmen to substitute language from the Baucus bill {which has the Medicare 50% discount] into the HR 3200 House health bill?
No answers so far. Just another hit and run by a group that thought they could pull the wool over our eyes in the progressive netroots. And now they’re trying to pull the wools over the eyes of Americans watching their televisions at home.



3 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
“The group, Americans For Stable Quality Care, which is a PhRMA-backed group along with the SEIU, Families USA, and the Federation of American Hospitals,…”
1) I thought that I’d been following the health care (or insurance reform) adventure reasonably well, but missed that SEIU is supposedly a PhRMA-backed group.
SEIU were good guys when we were demonstrating in New York City against Bush’s imminent invasion of Iraq. Ditto during the Dean campaign in 2004, too, for that matter, at least where I live.
What happened, and how do we know?
2) How in the dickens do you make quotes from a post into that tasteful blue when you paste them in a comment?
Thanks!
SEIU is not backed by PhRMA. What I meant was that the Americans For Stable Quality Care is backed by PhRMA in addition to the SEIU, Families USA, and the Federation of American Hospitals.
I don’t think you can make blockquotes blue in a comment, but let me try.
Yeah, you can make it blue in a comment when you use the blockquote tag, but have the brackets like this [text] and [/text]. Just replace them with arrows, and you’ve got it.
No, SEIU is not “backed by PhRMA.”
You’ll see the post has been updated to reflect the fact that SEIU is not in fact part of this coalition. The link above to Americans for Stable Quality Care does not list SEIU as a member, nor does the link in the ad itself, factsaboutreform.org.
Thanks for updating the most to correct the error Slinkerwink.
Disclosure: I’m proud to work for the Service Employees International Union.