Earlier, reading the comments during the liveblogging of the Senate Finance Committee mark-up, there were those who cheered when Senator Snowe voted against the Hatch amendment with other Democrats. They shouldn’t be cheering when Senator Snowe decides to vote with the Democrats on health insurance reform because it means the final bill will likely have a trigger on the public option with co-ops remaining as an alternative to the trigger on the public option.

Having her onboard means that the White House will do anything to find a bipartisan compromise, and that includes working with Blue Dog Democrats and moderates in the House to support the co-ops and a trigger on the public option.  And a bipartisan compromise for us means a mandated bailout of private insurers with no cost containment on monthly insurance premiums.

That’s political suicide for the Democratic Party. I’m not sure if they’re even aware how politically unpopular it will be to force Americans to buy insurance at 13% of their income with no cost containments on their private insurance premiums. The Republicans know how politically unpopular this will be, and it’s why they’ve flip-flopped on their support for individual mandates.  Take Senator Grassley as an example just a month ago on the issue of individual mandates:

As recently as a month ago, Chuck Grassley … announced that the way to get universal coverage is "through an individual mandate." He told Nightly Business report, "That’s individual responsibility, and even Republicans believe in individual responsibility." Earlier this year, Grassley told Fox News that there wasn’t "anything wrong" with mandates, even if some may view them "as an infringement upon individual freedom."

And to his flip-flop on that today:

Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, the Finance Committee’s senior Republican, said the mandate is among the reasons that he couldn’t support the bill despite months of negotiations with Mr. Baucus. "Individuals should maintain their freedom to chose health-care coverage, or not," he said.

The Republicans win either way—if a bad bill gets passed that they can take advantage of, and if there’s no bill passed which means a defeat of President Obama’s agenda.