Earlier, reading the comments during the liveblogging of the Senate Finance Committee mark-up, there were those who cheered when Senator Snowe voted against the Hatch amendment with other Democrats. They shouldn’t be cheering when Senator Snowe decides to vote with the Democrats on health insurance reform because it means the final bill will likely have a trigger on the public option with co-ops remaining as an alternative to the trigger on the public option.
Having her onboard means that the White House will do anything to find a bipartisan compromise, and that includes working with Blue Dog Democrats and moderates in the House to support the co-ops and a trigger on the public option. And a bipartisan compromise for us means a mandated bailout of private insurers with no cost containment on monthly insurance premiums.
That’s political suicide for the Democratic Party. I’m not sure if they’re even aware how politically unpopular it will be to force Americans to buy insurance at 13% of their income with no cost containments on their private insurance premiums. The Republicans know how politically unpopular this will be, and it’s why they’ve flip-flopped on their support for individual mandates. Take Senator Grassley as an example just a month ago on the issue of individual mandates:
As recently as a month ago, Chuck Grassley … announced that the way to get universal coverage is "through an individual mandate." He told Nightly Business report, "That’s individual responsibility, and even Republicans believe in individual responsibility." Earlier this year, Grassley told Fox News that there wasn’t "anything wrong" with mandates, even if some may view them "as an infringement upon individual freedom."
And to his flip-flop on that today:
Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, the Finance Committee’s senior Republican, said the mandate is among the reasons that he couldn’t support the bill despite months of negotiations with Mr. Baucus. "Individuals should maintain their freedom to chose health-care coverage, or not," he said.
The Republicans win either way—if a bad bill gets passed that they can take advantage of, and if there’s no bill passed which means a defeat of President Obama’s agenda.



8 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Jane,
am assuming you saw this last night
Reid & Rahm made “hundreds of phone calls” to move Baucus bill
Someone recently left a very helpful link in comments.
If accurate.. the French numbers in contrast to what the Senate robber-barons are proposing today.. are simply astonishing.
Health Insurance Around the World: Just the Facts, Man…
[my bold added]
a little AR o/t
did you see CREW filed complaint against Mike Ross with DOJ/Public Integrity unit ?
link
I did.. Ross has lawyered up too…)
Certainly might explain his rush to the AR Chamber of Commerce for sympathy cash earlier this week.
Just shoot me now… We won’t have money left to buy the bullets if they pass anymore corporate welfare.
This is WHY the WH is so desperate to get Snowe… as outlined by Reich earlier this week on HuffPo… getting her onboard strengthens the hopes for the Baucus bill, weakens the Senate HELP committee bill, and by default the House HELP committe bill… and ultimately the PO…
REICH TOTALLY LAYS OUT THE WH STRATEGY FOR GETTING SNOWE ON BOARD IN ORDER TO ULTIMATELY WEAKEN CHANCES FOR THE PO… THAT’S WHY THEY WANT HER SO BADLY…. and it is not good for us… surPRISE, surPRISE, surPRISE.
His basic premise is that the reason the WH is pushing for approval of the Baucus bill (vs reconciliation) is that getting the Baucus bill approved will get it on the floor and will weaken the House bill with a PO (assuming a PO makes it in the House bill.)…. read this and weep… (itlaics are my comments)
Pls read the entire Reich post… it explains everything very clearly.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..90287.html
And you know what ultimately pisses me off about the “healthcare” rhetoric?
The “must not add a dime to the deficit”…
So they take OUR money and give TRILLIONS to the banking industry who caused teh fucking recession in the first place and are STILL making money hand over fist (yet heaven forbid if we would make THEM accountable), hundreds of billions to the MIC for unwarranted wars, millions (if not billions) to farmer to grow corn that we then use to feed to cattle who can’t digest it and add to food to fuck up our children…
Oh, yes… no problem using our tax dollars for those items…
But use OUR tax dollars to benefit ACTUAL REAL LIVE AMERICANS!
Oh Lordy…. who could even think of such a thing! Why, that would be MORE ENTITLEMENTS!!
And you know we can’t have the taxpayers getting to determine how their money is spent.
Only the fucking corporations can do that.
Bastards.
The Democrats and President Obama already know. That is why the program will not take place until 2013, after two Congressional elections and one presidential election. The voters won’t be able to thank Congress until the election of 2014, when they will have had three election cycles to raise money and four years more to add to their already bloated pensions.
Of course, President Obama is so willing to take ownership of his “health care reform” he will not allow us to thank him.
This “reform” has all along been a way to increase profits for health insurance companies, who are going to be losing customers as the baby boomers move to Medicare. They can only replace these lost customers by forcing the only group available, the uninsured.
If there wasn’t going to be a surge in the number of seniors because of the baby boom, the health care debate in Congress would be about the illegal use of drugs among professional athletes.
Also, those geezers at the town halls were dead on accurate about “don’t touch my Medicare.” With so many people about to sign up, the only way to cut costs is to reduce how much it pays for services or to reduce the amount of services it covers. What do you think will happen? Instead of focusing on the perceived foolishness of the old folks, characterizing their comments as “confusion” over “public” and “private,” liberals should have been listening.
Remember, Medicare is not the greatest health insurance program ever created. Far from it. Most people supplement it by buying private insurance. Medicare does not include such basics as regular checkups (you get a one-time examination when you sign up). Most Europeans would storm their legislatures and capitals if presented with such a poor program.
Obama is one of the cagiest pols since Tricky Dick. Liberals have been greatly fooled by him. He is going to go after Social Security, too, which he often refers to as “insurance.” He is too smart not to know SS is not any such thing.
He needs to be a one-term president.