The American corporate media and the Beltway crowd that runs it are working overtime with folk like Max Baucus to lie like a rug about how Teddy Kennedy got to be the most effective Democratic Senator outside of Lyndon Baines Johnson. They’re claiming he did it by constantly "compromising" in the name of "bipartisanship", which of course in Beltway Villager-Speak means "caving to Republicans on all matters of substance". Specifically, the Villagers are using this lie to tell Obama and the Democrats to cave on health care reform, Teddy’s life’s work, in a way that Teddy himself in his last months was horrified to see even being contemplated.
It’s telling that the Beltway Bozos waited until he was dead and couldn’t correct them before they cut loose with their nonsense. Well, since he’s not around, that job falls to me.
Max Baucus and his fellow travelers for Big Pharma and Big Insurance are pretending that longtime single-payer champion Teddy Kennedy would approve of their selling him out with their co-op bills, saying he would welcome that "compromise". What they aren’t telling you is that Teddy already did compromise by dropping single-payer for the public option, and eliminating the public option would make a "reform" bill worse than no bill at all.
Here’s the deal: First off, the Beltwayers are trying to pretend that the Democrats haven’t already compromised on health care reform, when in fact the biggest compromise — the decision to abandon the fight for immediate universal single-payer — happened right at the start, and with Senator Kennedy’s knowledge.
Second off, the public option was itself set upon by Max Baucus and his fellow Senate Finance Committee beneficiaries of Big Insurance’s big bucks, even as the bill from the Senate’s own health committee — which includes the public option — has been shoved to one side by Baucus and the other bozos who are working to kill Teddy’s legacy even as they say they’re upholding it. (Baucus is talking so sweetly about how he’d been meeting with Teddy on health care reform right up "until the spring", implying that only Senator Kennedy’s worsening condition kept Max from continuing the conversations — but what he doesn’t say is that the end of his dealing with Teddy came after the May debacle wherein Baucus officially sold him out to the insurance companies.)
Finally, Teddy Kennedy never allowed anyone to corrupt or destroy his desired bills in the name of "compromise". He would find other means to get Republicans on board. When he pushed for legislation to create the National Cancer Institute in 1971, then-president Richard Nixon offered to back it on the condition that Teddy take his own name off the bill he’d created. Teddy did so without a gripe or a grumble — his ego didn’t matter, the bill did, and so long as all that was changed was the name, he didn’t care who got the credit or why.
Remember all that the next time you see Max Baucus or Kent Conrad flap their gums about how a bill without a public option must pass "because we must do this for Teddy". They’d better hope ghosts don’t exist, otherwise Teddy’s is going to reach out and throttle them for their lies. Or he might well "compromise" by kicking them in the crotch a few times.





34 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Way to go, Max. The poor man has been dead a whole day and already you’re abusing his memory. Can’t you leave this kind of thing to Internet trolls and show some respect?
When does Nooners start channeling Teddy? That’s when we know the wingnut seance machinery is going full steam ahead.
Ted Kennedy is synonymous with medicare for all.
Which is why the public option should be called “Tedicare for All”.
I’ll remind you that Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), member of the “Gang of Six,” said, “We have not had the public option on the table.”
They have NO shame.
LBJ woulda held those Blew Dawgs up by their ears if they’d behaved this way. In the Rose Garden. On camera. One at a time, with that grin on his face. No apologies. LBJ didn’t take shit from idiots, and was a master at roping in the strays who went off the reservation.
His lessons were learned by KKKarl, and seemingly forgotten by the current Dem leadership. Our loss.
Baucus didn’t even wait until Kennedy’s corpse was cold. With the overwhelming sense of loss and grief that the public is expressing, I have a feeling that he is going to regret this ploy. Nobody who understands who Kennedy was is going to believe for a second that Baucus is championing Kennedy’s cause. It is a shameful attempt to hitch his star to Kennedy’s reputation. It won’t work.
FU, Max Buaucus.
Montana Dems re rebelling against him.
Look, we have to defeat this bill.
If Obama supports it, then we leave the Democratic Party.
Hunter said it on dkos.
No more.
If Obama is in thrall to blue dogs and corporations, then we walk away.
I am so hoping that Sen. Kennedy left a letter behind directing the Democrats to stand firm on nothing less that a public option, and that those directions are made public.
Max is a corporate whore. He’s just following orders.
If Obama remains silent regaridng this disecration of Sen. Kennedy’s memory, then we know which side he is on.
I hope his wife speaks out.
pretty funny how all of a sudden we can see nowhere to be found the propaganda they once spread;
“government is so inefficient, 500 dollar hammers and 2000 dollar toilet seats, private industry would never waste that kind of money”
which now of course we see;
“how can we compete with government providing the service, they will put us out of business!”
man, they use both arguments at the same time and their marionettes have no problem using either at will
Hey, no problem. Even if there isn’t such a letter, you could always get the mad Denver vandal Maurice Schwenkler to write one.
Helpfully yours,
sadly PW and Firedogs –
looks like Jon Tester is right there with him
“a deal’s a deal” afterall X~o
No, they do not.
Tester needs to see some of those poll results showing just how little Montanans think of Baucus’s bull WRT health care.
Are there ANY REAL men left in government ,these days?
A letter and his wife speaking out would be very nice. And if there isn’t some sort of written directive, then let’s hope the wife raises her voice. It would cut some weight right now…
he clearly is ‘in thrall’ as you put it. See Greenwald today:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/g…..index.html
but it might be more accurate to say that he is the Leader of the Democratic Party, and that is what the Democratic Party is, the pretty campaign rhetoric they trot out in even numbered years notwithstanding.
Kennedy was one of the last of the great lions of the Old Democratic Party, and he’s gone now.
not much reason for folks with sincere progressive principles to keep hanging around the thoroughly Blue Doggified, DLC, Corporate faction that sports the (D) after their names.
Everyone knows that Sen. Kennedy wanted single payer. Did he consult with the HELP committee and Dodd while sick to compromise with a public option? Yes. Would he want co-op’s and 35% consumer payouts on top of deductibles? Very Doubtful. Would he have compromised with repubs for tort reform, mandates and crossing state lines to purchase insurance? Definitely not.
Baucus can claim whatever he wants, doesn’t make it true.
you know Phoenix Woman – Tester made these statements after the Montana Chairs revolted – what in bloody hell ? those are the people (outside of dfh’s) singularly responsible for this clown having his seat
I can’t seem to get in to montana maven’s site – can someone please forward the link to them so they can place some sod busting boots sideways in the appropriate spot ? ‘k thx
@19
A letter between Nancy Reagan and Ted discussing the need for health reform would be a gamechanger,for sure…(I can dream,can’t I)*G*
If you go to Organizing for America and sign up for the Sept. 13 March for Healthcare it clearly states, and this is Obama’s campaign arm:
“The purpose of this group is to organize a march on Sept. 13th. across the USA. Congress is wavering on the public option and we must demand one if we expect health care costs to go down.”
It looks to me like they’re getting back on the public option horse or am I dreaming?
not much reason for folks with sincere progressive principles to keep hanging around the thoroughly Blue Doggified, DLC, Corporate faction that sports the (D) after their names.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Disenchanted,disillusioned,disgusted,depressed,downhearted,downtrodden…..
Wow, there are a lot of crickets in this room.
Dead men tell no lies,but the living ones sure as hell have wasted NO time in doing so!
hey, don’t be Disenchanted,disillusioned,disgusted,depressed,downhearted,downtrodden! it’s great to be free of the guilt by association, cognitive dissonance, and dismay that comes with supporting politicians who turn around and betray all their campaign rhetoric the moment they are elected.
many learned the hard way under Clinton and never set foot back in the big tent, and therefore don’t have to wince when dozens more innocent civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan die under attacks from the (D) CIC that they helped elect.
Didn’t Teddy endorse Obama? Surely his political senses were sharp enough to know just exactly what and who he was giving the imprimateur of the Kennedy name and legacy to…
Therefore, small observer that I am, cannot help but wonder not who sold out who but rather in fact Teddy and O know exactly what they are doing.
AMEN brother. I’ll join you.
gotta grant it to baucus. he’s probably the most reviled politician in the country today. that’s quite a feat when your competition is inhofe, grassley, enzi and palin.
baucus doesn’t give a shit though. if he loses the next election, there’s always a plush lobbying gig in the works.
On the other hand, Jeff Bingaman has said that the public option is on the table and it’s important.
Don’t forget Coburn (R-Forced Birth).
Baucus is a dirty double-crossing four-flusher. With Democrats like him who needs Republicans. Democrats might just as well boot him out of the caucus.
On the other hand, he does rake in a lot of pay off money from the profit health insurance industry.
Two choices for Obama:
1. Public option or veto
2. Pay off money from profit health insurance.
I’m not optimistic about the first choice.
Does it seem to anybody else that we might have elected a George W. Obama?