HCAN |
FDL |
| $40,000,000 | $66,120 |
| 0 Commitments | 14 Commitments |
I’ve written in the past about the weakness of the coalition model when it comes to progressive advocacy. They are only as risk tolerant as their least risk-tolerant member, and they are generally good only at operating as bureaucracies — they are just not structured to run in campaign mode. The complete failure of HCAN to conduct the health care battle on behalf of those who should be fighting hardest is a case in point.
HCAN started out with $500,000 from each member of its 13 member steering committee members ($6.5 million), got $10 million from Atlantic Philanthropies, more from George Soros, and came out of the gate announcing that they had an "initial infusion" of $40 million and would spend $25 million in paid media. (Almost none of which, by the way, went to advertising on blogs — almost all HCAN ads were co-branded with partners and placed directly by those partners. They kept Soros’s and Gara Lamarche’s money for themselves.)
And what do they have to show for their efforts? Well, here’s the top target from their just released August field report:
CHAMPIONS—in the House and Senate, we need our champions in the House to step up and move colleagues to build support, we need commitments in the House that Members won’t vote for a watered down bill and in the Senate that Members will work to strengthen the HELP bill
I emailed HCAN’s director, Richard Kirsch, and asked him how many "commitments" HCAN had gotten from members in the past year. He replied that we should talk about it later in the week. I said I wasn’t available later in the week and it was a simple question. Didn’t hear back.
As far as I know, the answer is "zero."
Since we began our whip campaign at FDL on June 23, we’ve spent $22,185.61 of the $66,120 we’ve raised. That includes paying NYCEve, Slinkerwink, Dave Meyer, Marisa McNee, Mike Stark, and two additional people to do state blog outreach and our email campaign. It also includes travel expenses to bring Hilda Sarkisian and her husband here from Los Angeles, and NYCEve from NY to DC twice.
In 40 days, we’ve gotten 14 members to commit to vote against any health care bill that has co-ops or triggers.
That works out to $1,584.65 per vote for 14 votes at FDL, and $40 million for zero votes at HCAN.
We’re going to be looking for how successfully HCAN achieves its objectives and running a tally of how many commitments they get this August in our sidebar, with millions of dollars at their disposal.
Maybe they can start with Jan Schakowsky, who is one of their Congressional liaisons, and whose husband Bob Creamer serves as a consultant to HCAN? Will she commit to vote against any bill that has co-ops or triggers, consistent with the HCAN pledge?
Unless HCAN is little more than the liberal gravy train for Congressional spouses, It seems like something they ought to be able to do.



18 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Damn Jane, you are on fire today. We all need to get a little of what Jane has – she is kicking ass and taking names (both literally and figuratively).
Keep it going Jane – we will try and stay up.
I bet we hear from Jason R. over here pretty quick.
((((Jane))))
Good point, Jane! I mean, even the right-wing sheltered workshops at least turn out people who are armed to do battle on the network and cable news programs, so they’re not totally worthless. (Then again, the network and cable news programs are generally allergic to spokespeople who are to the left of Dick Cheney, unless they’re cherry-picked to be as unappetizing and/or incoherent as possible to the viewers at home.)
Meanwhile, FDL, in terms of bang for the buck, is to activism what cash-for-clunkers is to stimulus packages: Big results for minimal money.
I like Jason and think he does incredible work. It’s the model and not the people involved.
I understand – I was just saying Jason is fairly proactive and responsive – so I suspect he will be over to discuss this issue. He seems to be very approachable via email and via blog comments.
Agreed — Jason does excellent legwork and research.
clarifying as hell Jane.
have been chewin’ on this since this morning when I went over there and couldn’t find anything on their “find an event” link that wasn’t already on the FDL tracker – wondering why they weren’t helping with efforts like ours -
ok, I’ve actually been bothered by it since you mentioned the “big groups” turned down your request for help on the Sarkissian expenses
immensely clarifying.
Sometimes I really have to wonder about the placement of their ads. When they are on Rachel or ED or KO aren’t they just preaching to the choir.
Ouch. That’s pretty “Stark” (pun intended).
Ever since I’ve been politically active, this dynamic has always amazed me. The people who do so much with so little, the ones with proven results, are so often cast aside. Meanwhile, mediocrity gets promoted and funded year after year. (of course, this isn’t just in political activism and organizing either)
I do know that some groups like this do some valuable things. As Jane points out though, it’s about balance, and especially in the fundraising arena. Imagine what we’d getting done with just a small fraction of $40 million.
Time to spread it around all you moneybags out there. We get results too!
Yeah we were getting a little funding from a “progressive group” and they cut it last week after members of Congress called and complained about Mike Stark trying to get them on the record (it was included in the $66,000 total).
I’m going to write about it in a bit. We’ve been scrambling since we heard to try and figure out out we’re going to cover our costs, since we wanted to send Mike Stark and Eve around to be at meetups with members in August, and run Google and Facebook ads in support. Am still working it out.
So if anyone’s wondering why we’re a half step behind in our August response, rest assured we’ll get there by tomorrow, we have an amazing team who are working hard and it threw them to hear that this group with Labor unions on their board thought it was okay to tell people on Friday afternoon that they wouldn’t have jobs on Monday morning. They’d scream bloody murder if anyone tried that with them, and rightfully so.
I told everyone we’d pick up the expense and they didn’t have to worry about their jobs. We’ll launch a fundraiser tomorrow to try and cover it.
The irony? We got our funding cut — BECAUSE we got results.
There is no penalty for progressive failure, only success.
Jane, OMG, you are a force of nature, girlfriend! What a fucking honor to call you a friend and work with you!
Force of nature is YOU sis!
This is very discouraging, to hear about success being punished and lack of achievement rewarded. Worse, the powers-that-be squawk about being put on the spot about their votes, and FDLAction loses support.
Forty million dollars is a lot of money. What exactly have they to show for it?
Perhaps that was the plan all along? The employees and volunteers within the groups are usually really great people trying to do well, but they often don’t know/think about the bigger picture. They’re just trying to do their jobs really well.
However, it’s quite conceivable that the big, BIG money that founded many of these groups wanted to do this specifically to consolidate the money and keep control. Fairly simple concept, and I know that was what the DLC was/is all about. This is exactly the same dynamic we’re fighting right now with the Blew Dogs. Keeps any real Liberal reforms from actually happening.
When people see the truth, without the BigMedia-approved framing and lies, they rise up for fairness and justice. Happens every time throughout history and is happening right now in other countries. Y’all are busting down their gigantic House (and Senate) of cards, and lifting the curtain they’ve hid behind for decades, and it’s freaking ‘em out.
My favorite moment from all of these so far is that time Dana Bash was running interference for Mike Ross. Such a pristine exposure of the Big Game, that was.
Fantastic work by all involved and onward and upward!
What’s HCAN? It’s a measure of their effectivness that I don’t know.
Fund something with big dollars, tie everyone’s hands. Happened with AAEI and the immigration battle, too. We all know how resoundingly well that worked out.
Nobody cares that the model doesn’t work apparently, as long as they get paid.
Now, if only the HCAN’t talking points could be purged…
Nevertheless… Rock and roll.
Thanks Jane- Schakowsky looks even worse than I expected.
Link below is from post from an SP advocate in Schakowsky’s district.
http://www.counterpunch.org/redmond04232009.html
My reason for posting this link is not to focus on the SP vs PO aspects, but rather to give additional info about the uh “integrity” of Jan Schakowsky. The post is from April 23, 2009, so it’s “old” by internet standards. But, just a further peek into her “integrity”- that’s my main point.