<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Enzi&#8217;s Idea of Bipartisanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/</link>
	<description>Politics for liberal newsgeeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:45:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CasualObserver</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35110</link>
		<dc:creator>CasualObserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35110</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;WTF were the Dems thinking? Are they really this stupid? Yes, Virginia, the Dems are that stupid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it’s important to remember why the Democrats are prizing bipartisanship so highly.  Their behavior is coming from their fear of doing anything substantive &lt;em&gt;on their own&lt;/em&gt;.  If health care reform was finally passed, and failed, &lt;em&gt;it would be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) If they closed Guantanamo, and something bad happened as a result, &lt;em&gt;it would/could/might be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(3)  If they followed through on their many promises and pulled US troops from Iraq, and something went wrong&lt;em&gt;it would/could/might be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(4) If they stopped wiretapping our phones and restored our constitutional guarantees–and something bad happened (like a terrorist attack), it would/could/might be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The GOP is acting in a totally virulent way, with absolutely no regard for what is good governmental policy.  But the Democrats are acting–as a party–in an equally horrible manner.  Taken together, they form two sides of a particularly ugly, corroded and dysfunctional coin.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WTF were the Dems thinking? Are they really this stupid? Yes, Virginia, the Dems are that stupid.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think it’s important to remember why the Democrats are prizing bipartisanship so highly.  Their behavior is coming from their fear of doing anything substantive <em>on their own</em>.  If health care reform was finally passed, and failed, <em>it would be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.</em></p>
<p>(2) If they closed Guantanamo, and something bad happened as a result, <em>it would/could/might be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.</em></p>
<p>(3)  If they followed through on their many promises and pulled US troops from Iraq, and something went wrong<em>it would/could/might be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.</em></p>
<p>(4) If they stopped wiretapping our phones and restored our constitutional guarantees–and something bad happened (like a terrorist attack), it would/could/might be blamed on the Democrats and they’d theoretically pay in the next election.</p>
<p>The GOP is acting in a totally virulent way, with absolutely no regard for what is good governmental policy.  But the Democrats are acting–as a party–in an equally horrible manner.  Taken together, they form two sides of a particularly ugly, corroded and dysfunctional coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35086</link>
		<dc:creator>JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Enzi is a far right Senator from a right wing/far right wing/libertarian state.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the guy who is going to bring us health care reform?  Why was Enzi given so much power?  Why were 3 GOP Senators (Enzi, Grassley, and Snowe) working on a bill when the Dems have 60 votes?  Why destroy the entire bill just for 3 GOP Senators, two of which never had any intention of voting for it?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WTF were the Dems thinking?  Are they really this stupid?  Yes, Virginia, the Dems are that stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enzi is a far right Senator from a right wing/far right wing/libertarian state.    </p>
<p>This is the guy who is going to bring us health care reform?  Why was Enzi given so much power?  Why were 3 GOP Senators (Enzi, Grassley, and Snowe) working on a bill when the Dems have 60 votes?  Why destroy the entire bill just for 3 GOP Senators, two of which never had any intention of voting for it?  </p>
<p>WTF were the Dems thinking?  Are they really this stupid?  Yes, Virginia, the Dems are that stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35084</link>
		<dc:creator>JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35084</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He probably has been innudated with angry phone calls, so Baucus took it off the hook.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Baucus is as stupid, corrupt, and as arrogant as any of them.  It’s hilarious how Enzi and Grassley made him look like a total idiot (which Baucus was doing quite well on his own with his ridiculous “bipartisan” fetish).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He probably has been innudated with angry phone calls, so Baucus took it off the hook.</p>
<p>Baucus is as stupid, corrupt, and as arrogant as any of them.  It’s hilarious how Enzi and Grassley made him look like a total idiot (which Baucus was doing quite well on his own with his ridiculous “bipartisan” fetish).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenjen</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35082</link>
		<dc:creator>jenjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Only those folks promote private companies paid on the taxpayers dime delivering socialized services.  What if we could opt to pay military protection insurance, so if there was an invasion of Ruskies through Alaska, the level of protection you got against a commie take over of your living-room would depend on your policy fine print.  Darn if only I’d gone for the extra $2,000 a month stealth bomber plan, I wouldn’t be breaking rocks in a Siberian labor camp.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or how about Criminal Prison Protection Insurance.  If you get mugged, but you don’t have prison protection insurance, your mugger stays on the outside.  Hey, you have no-one to blame but yourself! You should have paid premiums. But if you have insurance - yipee he’s sent down! But now you can’t get insured again because you have a pre-existing sentence.  Just feel lucky you were too dazed to fight back, cos your actions would have fallen under the contributory negligence exclusion, and he’d have been out on the street.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But wait you didn’t opt for additional parole coverage, so when he’s out, no one’s going to keep an eye on him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only those folks promote private companies paid on the taxpayers dime delivering socialized services.  What if we could opt to pay military protection insurance, so if there was an invasion of Ruskies through Alaska, the level of protection you got against a commie take over of your living-room would depend on your policy fine print.  Darn if only I’d gone for the extra $2,000 a month stealth bomber plan, I wouldn’t be breaking rocks in a Siberian labor camp.  </p>
<p>Or how about Criminal Prison Protection Insurance.  If you get mugged, but you don’t have prison protection insurance, your mugger stays on the outside.  Hey, you have no-one to blame but yourself! You should have paid premiums. But if you have insurance &#8211; yipee he’s sent down! But now you can’t get insured again because you have a pre-existing sentence.  Just feel lucky you were too dazed to fight back, cos your actions would have fallen under the contributory negligence exclusion, and he’d have been out on the street.  </p>
<p>But wait you didn’t opt for additional parole coverage, so when he’s out, no one’s going to keep an eye on him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robspierre</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35064</link>
		<dc:creator>robspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35064</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, quite a few people ARE saying that things like public fire protection (and roads and the military and prisons) are evil socialism. These people are called “Republicans” and “Blue Rats” (or something like that). They are not only against Marx and Kucinich. They are against Teddy Roosevelt, Jefferson, Tom Paine, and Adam Smith–all  too far left for the wingnut version of “mainstream”. King George (the Defender of the Faith, you know) was good enough for any true American.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, quite a few people ARE saying that things like public fire protection (and roads and the military and prisons) are evil socialism. These people are called “Republicans” and “Blue Rats” (or something like that). They are not only against Marx and Kucinich. They are against Teddy Roosevelt, Jefferson, Tom Paine, and Adam Smith–all  too far left for the wingnut version of “mainstream”. King George (the Defender of the Faith, you know) was good enough for any true American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35063</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35063</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;flea with hard on floats on his back down the river and expects draw bridge to open.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flea with hard on floats on his back down the river and expects draw bridge to open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: booyah</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35056</link>
		<dc:creator>booyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35056</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s what I responded to in my above post:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Don’t fall for the propoganda, don’t react to it, don’t acknowledge it other than to counter it . . . we have to message ourselves in other ways . . . “&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t believe I “jumped the shark” ( ridiculous idiom!… and don’t call me hoss!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s what I responded to in my above post:</p>
<p>“Don’t fall for the propoganda, don’t react to it, don’t acknowledge it other than to counter it . . . we have to message ourselves in other ways . . . “</p>
<p>Don’t believe I “jumped the shark” ( ridiculous idiom!… and don’t call me hoss!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larue</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35051</link>
		<dc:creator>Larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoa, you mistake my comments for a personal attack, which it wasn’t. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought I made clear my comment was about seeing people on TV.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And my thoughts are about ALL people, who DO see this stuff on TV, and believe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You jumped the shark there, hoss . . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, you mistake my comments for a personal attack, which it wasn’t. </p>
<p>I thought I made clear my comment was about seeing people on TV.</p>
<p>And my thoughts are about ALL people, who DO see this stuff on TV, and believe.</p>
<p>You jumped the shark there, hoss . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: booyah</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35037</link>
		<dc:creator>booyah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35037</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not falling for the propaganda… I know what I hear from my relatives and friends who email me…. Please do not tell me what to say or think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also base this statement on the fact that a dkos poster was talking to her elederly mom about the public option and her mother was against it “because it will be run by the governemtn and is too expensive.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is what middle America thinks… I have my frame of reference, you have yours.  People are too easily swayed by the big Pharma and insurance ads.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not falling for the propaganda… I know what I hear from my relatives and friends who email me…. Please do not tell me what to say or think.</p>
<p>I also base this statement on the fact that a dkos poster was talking to her elederly mom about the public option and her mother was against it “because it will be run by the governemtn and is too expensive.”</p>
<p>This is what middle America thinks… I have my frame of reference, you have yours.  People are too easily swayed by the big Pharma and insurance ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eureka Springs</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35036</link>
		<dc:creator>Eureka Springs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/07/30/president-enzis-idea-of-bipartisanship/#comment-35036</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/30/enzi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Krugman&lt;/a&gt; today on Enzi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The central fact of the health care debate is that there is essentially no agreement on anything — values, philosophy, vision of how the world works — between the two sides. Progressives want universal coverage, and see an expanded government role as essential to getting there. Conservatives believe, in the face of all evidence, that free markets are the answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Enzi is very conservative. According to Vote View, my site for left-right rankings, Enzi was the 8th most conservative Senator in the last Congress — almost in the same league as Inhofe or DeMint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/30/enzi/" rel="nofollow">Krugman</a> today on Enzi</p>
<blockquote><p>The central fact of the health care debate is that there is essentially no agreement on anything — values, philosophy, vision of how the world works — between the two sides. Progressives want universal coverage, and see an expanded government role as essential to getting there. Conservatives believe, in the face of all evidence, that free markets are the answer.</p>
<p>And Enzi is very conservative. According to Vote View, my site for left-right rankings, Enzi was the 8th most conservative Senator in the last Congress — almost in the same league as Inhofe or DeMint.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.485 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 15:48:02 -->

