This is what the Blue Dogs in the House have been waiting for (per Chris Van Hollen):

After weeks of secretive talks, a bipartisan group in the Senate edged closer Monday to a health care compromise that omits a requirement for businesses to offer coverage to their workers and lacks a government insurance option that President Barack Obama favors, according to numerous officials.

And here…wait for it…co-ops!

They said any legislation that emerges from the talks is expected to provide for a non-profit cooperative to sell insurance in competition with private industry, rather than giving the federal government a role in the marketplace. The White House and numerous Democrats in Congress have called for a government option to provide competition to private companies and hold down costs.

The co-op squeeze play is alive and well.   As we’ve said before:

The easiest political path to passing health care is still running the "co-op" crunch. Regardless of what the House does, the Senate can pass Conrad’s shitty fake co-op. The Blue Dogs band together and refuse to vote for anything else, and that’s what comes out of conference. There’s a PR blitz to sell it as a "public plan" (which is why we’ve worked so assiduously to define it as NOT a public plan), and in a rush to get something passed, Rahm starts twisting progressive arms — which have been historically very easily twisted.

Which is why we need 40 (probably more) votes in the House to say "with  76% of the country behind us, we’ll block anything that doesn’t have a strong public plan.  No triggers, no co-ops."   Because the weaker the bill is, the more likely it is to pick up Republican votes.

Keep calling.