UPDATE: Here’s the weekly address from President Obama at the White House, which was released early. In the weekly address, President Obama set out the parameters of the health care debate, explained what the opponents of health care reform were doing, and drew a line in the sand around the essential elements of health care reform. First, he explains the stories he’s been hearing across the story about why health care reform is so important to him:
Right now in Washington, our Senate and House of Representatives are both debating proposals for health insurance reform. Today, I want to speak with you about the stakes of this debate, for our people and for the future of our nation.
This is an issue that affects the health and financial well-being of every single American and the stability of our entire economy.
It’s about every family unable to keep up with soaring out of pocket costs and premiums rising three times faster than wages. Every worker afraid of losing health insurance if they lose their job, or change jobs. Everyone who’s worried that they may not be able to get insurance or change insurance if someone in their family has a pre-existing condition.
It’s about a woman in Colorado who told us that when she was diagnosed with breast cancer, her insurance company – the one she’d paid over $700 a month to – refused to pay for her treatment. She had to use up her retirement funds to save her own life.
It’s about a man from Maryland who sent us his story – a middle class college graduate whose health insurance expired when he changed jobs. During that time, he needed emergency surgery, and woke up $10,000 in debt – debt that has left him unable to save, buy a home, or make a career change.
It’s about every business forced to shut their doors, or shed jobs, or ship them overseas. It’s about state governments overwhelmed by Medicaid, federal budgets consumed by Medicare, and deficits piling higher year after year.
This is the status quo. This is the system we have today. This is what the debate in Congress is all about: Whether we’ll keep talking and tinkering and letting this problem fester as more families and businesses go under, and more Americans lose their coverage. Or whether we’ll seize this opportunity – one we might not have again for generations – and finally pass health insurance reform this year, in 2009.
Then President Obama calls out those in the Senate and in the House who have been obstructing health care reform:
This is the status quo. This is the system we have today. This is what the debate in Congress is all about: Whether we’ll keep talking and tinkering and letting this problem fester as more families and businesses go under, and more Americans lose their coverage. Or whether we’ll seize this opportunity – one we might not have again for generations – and finally pass health insurance reform this year, in 2009.
Now we know there are those who will oppose reform no matter what. We know the same special interests and their agents in Congress will make the same old arguments, and use the same scare tactics that have stopped reform before because they profit from this relentless escalation in health care costs. And I know that once you’ve seen enough ads and heard enough people yelling on TV, you might begin to wonder whether there’s a grain of truth to what they’re saying. So let me take a moment to answer a few of their arguments.
First, the same folks who controlled the White House and Congress for the past eight years as we ran up record deficits will argue – believe it or not – that health reform will lead to record deficits. That’s simply not true. Our proposals cut hundreds of billions of dollars in unnecessary spending and unwarranted giveaways to insurance companies in Medicare and Medicaid. They change incentives so providers will give patients the best care, not just the most expensive care, which will mean big savings over time. And we have urged Congress to include a proposal for a standing commission of doctors and medical experts to oversee cost-saving measures.
I want to be very clear: I will not sign on to any health plan that adds to our deficits over the next decade. And by helping improve quality and efficiency, the reforms we make will help bring our deficits under control in the long-term.
Those who oppose reform will also tell you that under our plan, you won’t get to choose your doctor – that some bureaucrat will choose for you. That’s also not true. Michelle and I don’t want anyone telling us who our family’s doctor should be – and no one should decide that for you either. Under our proposals, if you like your doctor, you keep your doctor. If you like your current insurance, you keep that insurance. Period, end of story.
Finally, opponents of health reform warn that this is all some big plot for socialized medicine or government-run health care with long lines and rationed care. That’s not true either. I don’t believe that government can or should run health care. But I also don’t think insurance companies should have free reign to do as they please.
Then President Obama drew a clear line across the sand in favor of the essential parts of health care reform that must pass Congress and be signed into law by him:
That’s why any plan I sign must include an insurance exchange: a one-stop shopping marketplace where you can compare the benefits, cost and track records of a variety of plans – including a public option to increase competition and keep insurance companies honest – and choose what’s best for your family. And that’s why we’ll put an end to the worst practices of the insurance industry: no more yearly caps or lifetime caps; no more denying people care because of pre-existing conditions; and no more dropping people from a plan when they get too sick. No longer will you be without health insurance, even if you lose your job or change jobs.
Bravo, Mr. President. Now that is presidential leadership that we’ve been waiting for. Now the White House is wading into the battle between the Senate and the House on health care reform. Should be interesting to see what the reactions are tomorrow from the "centrist" Democrats threatening to block health care reform. Here’s the rest of his speech below.
The good news is that people who know the system best are rallying to the cause of change. Just this past week, the American Nurses Association, representing millions of nurses across America, and the American Medical Association, representing doctors across our nation, announced their support because they’ve seen first-hand the need for health insurance reform.
They know we cannot continue to cling to health industry practices that are bankrupting families, and undermining American businesses, large and small. They know we cannot let special interests and partisan politics stand in the way of reform – not this time around.
The opponents of health insurance reform would have us do nothing. But think about what doing nothing, in the face of ever increasing costs, will do to you and your family.
So today, I am urging the House and the Senate, Democrats and Republicans, to seize this opportunity, and vote for reform that gives the American people the best care at the lowest cost; that reins in insurance companies, strengthens businesses and finally gives families the choices they need and the security they deserve.
Thanks.
UPDATE: The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is following up with a targeted ad push at the states of the 15 Democrats who are currently having trouble passing health reform in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. I’ll be following up on this in a later post at Campaign Silo, so stay tuned. The post is now up, so feel free to go over and comment!





85 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Damn girl you are fast:-)
He may have also put a slap down on the insurance companies with this line:
This language I think is new and cuts to the heart of the insurance companies cost saving and profit-driven measures found in the practice of rescission.
I look forward to seeing if you think this is new language as well.
Here is another reference to the Public Option in his last sentence:
finally gives families the choices they need
New CBO numbers released late Friday and it is GREAT NEWS. Henry Waxman is going to love dealing with the Blue Dogs next week with this big-ass stick in his hand.
There we go. That wasn’t so hard, was it? Congress, you’re up.
Stump. Get out there and sell this plan. The whole country is waiting for the President to put his foot down. I believe they will line right up if he provides strong leadership and jumps into the fight.
His NAACP speech – now that is commanding. We are waiting for you, Mr. President.
I would have liked to have heard, instead of “that’s simply not true” is “that’s bullshit.”
Hey, if you can say “blowjob” on TeeVee why not “bullshit?”
This is Great did all the networks carry this speech what was the GOP response (no tv here).
The President has said this won’t increase the debt lets save all clips of the GOPers saying it will increase the debt for election time.
Even with Bush gone the GOP is still wrong Wrong about healthcare then we play a clip of the GOPer running opposing healthcare, Wrong about the costs play a clip of that same GOPer saying it will increase the National debt
but very eager to take the credit when Things Go Right!
play a clip of that same GOPer in 2 years trying to take credit for healthcare:)
And you just know that they are going to do it too.
Why are we talking about insurance?…people need health care. When people get sick they need doctors and medical care, not insurance. People don’t want to earn a profit from their illness they need to be healed.
Glad to see the president looked at the facts from the nation’s Small Business Administration, heard the personal narratives and realized the bottom line for our nation.
This will also help many states hit by auto manufacturing losses and boost our current manufacturing.
This needs to be spread by all of us to everyone we know, both online and off.
We KNOW the Sunday shows and papers will ignore this completely, and only report on the kabuki dance from the early/incomplete “report” from a few days ago.
It’ll be like the CBO final report saying it creates a SURPLUS never happened, at least in the BigMedia.
I have been wondering what exactly will Obama fight to the political death for and I think I see that it is health reform.
from http://www.counterpunch.org/mokhiber07162009.html
from: White House Nixes Appearance on ABC News
That new CBO estimate is going to get lost in the (justified) focus on Walter Cronkite’s death. We need to work to keep it front and center.
is still way too vague for me, but it might be vague enough to make Kent Conrad happy.
Scarborough, on Bill Maher’s show last night, lied about this fact saying CBO’s figures showed the cost was enormous (or something like that). Had Maher been better prepared, he could have called bullshit (can I say that on the intertoobz?) on Morning Joe.
I will look forward to getting the final bill and watching the experts at the Lake discuss and explain it.
These are the kind of policy arguments I want this is our turn up to bat and National Healthcare is one of our best ideas.
If we can make this work like we think we can America will be a much better place.
See that is the kind of clip I’m talking about if Joe ever runs for office again we save that clip and in 2 years we play it back for him.
Sure Joe does have a dead woman in his office to explain but given the number of GOPers retiring, caught cheating, likely to go down in torture investigations well Joe very well might be…all the GOP has left.
Ugh. It’s been there all along. This is simply another phase of it.
You’d think after being wrong about 80% of the time through the campaign and now during the Obama Admin, that the loud “Obama need to…” crowd would realize they could actually learn a few things from President Barack Hussein Obama. A little humility can go a long way sometimes…
So yes, Game on, and it’s clear who is on our team, as it has been all along.
I’m happy to see Obama back in the saddle and riding hard and swinging high. This comes with ownership of matters. At some point Obama had to take ownership of all the difficult things bequeathed to him by America’s most beloved rodeo clown. Not owning a problem means you don’t have a persoanl stake in its solution. Owning a problem. on the other hand, means you are fully invested in solving it.
I have felt better about Obama since he gave his speech to the NAACP. He was passionate, not bloodless, and inspring, not professorial. This is what we need, and what he needs, to solve difficult problems. We need inspired leadership from Obama, and we need not be afraid of sacrifice for the common good.
The CBO estimate helps overcome one obstacle, but it won’t be enough. We nned some passion and compassion mixed into this recipe or it will fall flat.
Change??!!
Yea, just use the “bully pulpit” and demand a bunch of entrenched Senators vote the way he wants them to. It’s all so simple!
watch out for the spinners.
here is more WAPO-style BS:
wapo BS:
Fundraising Picks Up for GOP Senate Hopefuls
By Ben Pershing
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Shut out of power across the capital and facing a 60-vote Democratic majority in the Senate, Republican candidates are working to balance the scales in at least one vital category — campaign cash.
Reports filed last week with the Federal Election Commission showed GOP hopefuls in some key Senate contests posting strong fundraising totals for the second quarter of 2009, putting them in position to try to halt their party’s recent losing streak.
you would think from this hedline and opening grafs that the whole story wouldnt list only 2 goopers leading, both in states whose seats were now HELD by goopers, and that the only quote from an “observer” as opposed to a paid gooper hack would say the Dems are in trouble.
He doesnt and they dont.
there are 3 examples were Dems lead, including this one:
In Kentucky, state Attorney General Jack Conway (D) raised $1.3 million for the quarter and Sen. Jim Bunning (R) — whom GOP officials hope will retire — brought in $300,000. Another potential Republican candidate, Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson, raised $600,000.
and this is the money quote:
Despite some impressive GOP fundraising, [non-partisan Stuart] Rothenberg said, “there aren’t that many states where Democrats are in trouble.” But Republicans still express hope, because they have almost nowhere to go but up.
Can private insurance really survive if this program is run right? I mean who in their right minds will stay with private insurance after one family member has their claimed denied.
People with extended families will pull their extended families out too.
Private Insurance can’t make the money they make now without denying claims or just delaying them.
They also need X number of customers to make the cash they make.
So if they deny claims they lose customers and cash. If they don’t deny claims they just lose cash.
Sure they can still make money but their stock price is based on the expectation of a certain amount of profit.
If this bill passes and it really is a good bill insurance stocks should drop.
A profound observation. Really. Even they blamed Bush sometimes for their woes.
(smiling)
Just listened to Thursday’s democracynow. From some earlier year (1990?) the % of premiums collected by medical insurance corps going to part for medical treatment has declined from 95% to 80%. The rest has been diverted to higher costs, higher executive compensation, and higher shareholder returns.
I didn’t see anything there about a public option, insurance exchange is not remotely the same thing.
I don’t think so for some of the reasons you mentioned, and that’s why I’m supportive of this current “public option” approach. It’s a subversive way to get to some sort of strong single-payer system (probably a hybrid with private like Canada and others).
And best yet, it’s using a talking point they’ve invested in for decades of glorious “free market competition” against themselves, and bring us a big Socialistic healthcare system. Brilliant!
While Congress and the corporate controlled media play their game of diversion , confussion , and charade with the lives and well being of millions of Americans thousands of more Americans are losing access to health care and more American lives . Just how much is an American life worth ?
Egggzacktly.
This is where we need Rahm we need him to go to the lobbyists Newt Style and say this will pass.
Now give us 3 times the cash that you gave the GOP or you and everyone past and present who works for your Lobbying firm will NEVER GET ANOTHER MEETING WITH A DEMOCRAT IN CONGRESS OR THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN BWAHAHAHAHA!.
The GOP does not have a filibuster proof majority they need one of us to defect to get a filibuster we can and will of course punish defectors.
So just why are the moron lobbyists giving the GOP cash? They got clients who are terrified. I smell fear.
I hope our side picks that one up as a talking point:)
I’m leaving shortly to attend a healthcare rally here in Portland, Maine:
http://whitenoiseinsanity.com/…..and-maine/
Looking forward to it! I hope the weather holds out, though. It’s been rainy and drizzly since I woke up.
Yes I like it! Stealth Socialized medicine and once the American people get a taste like they got Social Security they will never give it up.
Herbert Hoover’s failure’s gave us FDR and Social Security Bush’s failure’s gave us Obama and it looks like Healthcare.
The Genius of America is we are not afraid to change direction and learn from our failure’s!
Portland, Maine. Oh, you lucky gal. Friends originally from Maine had a place on Great Diamond Island, and it was the most amazing thing to be there for this inlander (though I do have Lake Superior). Go kick ass!
Maher also made an interesting observation saying that things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Civil Rights everybody today pretty much agrees are good things, though at the time they were established Republicans predicted the collapse of the American Way of Life. He asked Joe that maybe with health care reform (maybe this time, just maybe), perhaps the Republicans should get on the right side of history. Joe didn’t have much of a reponse to that.
Exactly. We are talking about insurance rather than health care because change is incremental, and we are still in the dark ages here. Thanks for the reminder – keeping the actual goal in mind is essential.
Not a penny as far as the GOP is concerned. I however would end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, drive a High MPG car, pay higher taxes all to help pay for National Healthcare.
Come to think of it don’t the polls show the average American is willing to pay higher taxes for National Healthcare?
You would think the News Media would mention that during a Recession the average American is willing to Pay Higher Taxes for National Healthcare.
I bet the average American is not willing to pay higher taxes for 2 wars though.
And, as has been pointed out in comments recently, the state option for single payer is the pathway. Obama is correct: if we don’t do health care reform this year, it won’t happen. Just like 1994.
Things like that make want to get a tv again:)
Be strong. Be very strong!!
thats the plan! a cobbled together travesty with stuffing sticking out, which the Obama fanboys will pretend is the most beautiful pony they have ever seen!
State option for single payer is nice, I suppose, but states don’t have the massive purchasing power of a national system, and the Lobbyists can exert serious pressure at the state level – and bribing state legislators is cheaper than bribing our noble public servants in Washington DC.
Bingo — watch Moyer’s Journal from last week, with Wendell Potter. About half way through, he explains how Wall Street analysts would meet with insurance co execs and insist that lower the “losses” number below 80%. “Losses” are the percentage actually paid for claims to providers. The rest goes to the insurer for admin costs, promotion, profits. If an insurer’s losses rose slightly from 78.5 to 79% during the quarter, Wall Street would note that as potential for declining profits and pound the company’s stocks.
Wall Street puts enormous pressure on insurers to deny claims, to keep the “losses” down. Bailouts for Goldman Sachs, anyone?
a few days ago I talked about the Singaporean system, rated by the WHO as the world’s best health system. By enrollment, the system is stable at 2/3rds private insurance and 1/3rd public single payer. The private system is able to compete not on standard of care but on perks like private rooms… even luxury suites, same day or even on demand appointments for non critical issues, house calls and concierge doctoring, etc. Also, only their 5 million citizens can choose the public system. Expats, and the island nation has a lot
of those, must participate in the private system… so yeah, private insurance can survive…
My bold, Italics
Even with Bush gone the GOP is still wrong The GOP has always been wrong historically whenever they stood against social change. Because they always put the wealthy above the common man/good.
They always play the races against each other to keep them divided (Divide and Conquer) and the dumb Racists like Pat Buchanan fall for it.
Have you actually read up on this stuff? You might want to try it sometime instead of just cherry-picking whatever you think backs your claim that “they’re all the same”. (By the way, Republicans love you guys so much they’ve donated millions to the Greens over the years. In fact, they actually funded and controlled the Pennsylvania Green Party from top to bottom.)
And they also scream today about a 3% rise in the top marginal tax rate, as if that’ll bring America to it’s knees since they richest of the rich won’t get their bathrooms re-tiled as often now.
Today’s Repubs and BigMedia either don’t know or purposely cover up the fact that the top tax rate through much of the “good ‘ol days,” which most would agree was the 1950s and 60s, was over 90%, as opposed to the 35% of today. Even through most of the last century, especially when America became the world’s superpower, our top tax rate was over 80%. Kind of shocking when it’s laid out so clearly as it is here:
http://www.truthandpolitics.org/top-rates.php
Yet, John Q. Nascar still thinks America’s economic problems and mortgaged future is a result of those high-priced union workers and welfare Cadillac drivers. This was carefully engineered this way by BigMoney, and this why I feel busting up BigMedia with antitrust legislation is the key for every other issue in the future. When people see the basic facts, most will do the right thing and stop voting for Repubs. Hell, antitrust bust-ups should be happening in every industry. Nothing should be too big to fail or too big to control public discourse.
Good point now how do we tell the Main Stream Media their doom and gloom stories are just hysterical whining over change?
Know Great Diamond Island well. Lived not far from there growing up and know a couple from my hometown who are part owners of Little Diamond Island. :-)
somethin’ hinky with that linky
Mornin’ all,
I googled your headline to read the story and it took me to Big Orange, but there’s no diary, just a heading “sorry I can’t find that story”
same is true for a counter point diary high up on the rec list this am
got link ?
I think the other part of it is, companies will continue to offer private insurance as a perk to remain attractive to employees… useful for those employees who could be transfered abroad or who just want to travel alot.
PW’s up
If Conservatives Do Pay-To-Play, Is It Still News?
Sorry for the quick drive-by, but I got an e-mail from Dennis Kucinich this morning (maybe it came yesterday, 4H fair week is a blur for me) he said his amendment allowing states to develop their own single-payer system passed. Has there been discussion about that?
Hmmm 15% of premiums going to profit if we assume the Obama plan creates real competition the market will panic and probably over sell past the 15% expected drop in profits.
Blub @ 44 says that the insurance companies can make money by paying for perks a private room etc.
I see an insurance sell off if the Obama plan passes and after a year or so I see people buying them again.
Funny thing though I don’t see the stock holders demanding the money spent on lobbying back.
Yes there has been. Several Repubs surprisingly voted for it, which was an encouraging sign as it starts to move through the sausage-maker.
and Goldman Sachs funds and controls your party – one of the top donors to Obama’s campaign, thereafter rewarded with influential positions at Treasury and the Fed.
I’ve never even been to Pennsylvania – opportunistic wedge-funding of their GP is kind of cherrypicking as well, n’est-ce-pas?
I will admit I have not dived into the primary sources – the various plans are in constant flux, with much witheld, and subject to last minute revisions and earmarking, etc.
the overall tendencies are very clear, however – money talks big in Washington, and the Democratic Party typically enacts sham reforms.
call it cherrypicking if you will, but the trees are loaded down heavy with cherries.
(also isn’t the fact that Obama’s personal doc in Chicago is a single-payer advocate a tasty one?)
Have you seen this from French teebee? Face-Off on France24.
Go away for a little bit and see everyone’s on a new thread. SD, left you a comment about 7-up at the end of Christy’s thread.
hey you seem to have forgotten Vietnam – which side was the Democratic Party on on that one?
The amount of money Obama got from Goldman, or Wall St as a whole for that matter, could be made up for in one email blast from his campaign. The overwhelming majority of Obama’s money came from individual donors, especially $200 and below. He shattered all records for this.
So, if your theory is that he is bought and paid for by the highest bidders, then he is far more beholden to “We, the people…” than anyone else, and he’s actions back this up in my opinion.
Of course, I’m probably just some mindless rube though…
Geithner!1!! Summers!!1! Bailouts!1!!
to get this to work though, the excess costs imposed by the insurers and the medical industry have to be drained from the system. The medical essentials of the Singaporean system operates at around 3% of GDP (the same for much of western Europe) versus 7-8% in the US (rising to 15% by 2020 or so). If you can provide core medical services effectively at 3% of GDP you have a lot of room to sell perks, like concierge doctoring, to private insurees. The problem
is that whole US medical services supply chain is broken….
I saw that. Thanks. Gonna hafta see why nobody here carries it. Vernor’s ginger soda the only soft drink I drink now.
good point – I’ll cede it completely because I don’t have total pie charts of his donations in front of me.
but consider – big money donors from Wall Street can and do switch sides, and sometimes they support both condidates.
Netroots always supports Democrats, seemingly no matter what they do.
therefore, Netroots, as well as being highly diffuse, has less structural leverage.
Fixed it for ya.
When the Rethugs are in power they get more dust. When the Dems are in power they get more dust.
wouldn’t it be great to have a few more pols who just couldn’t stand the taste of the stuff?
And don’t you think Goldman Sachs and others strategically give more to one party to give the impression they are completely for the candidate, but really aren’t? As George Bush’s tenure was ending in that last year, you know, the era where Goldman Sachs operated criminally without interruption, wouldn’t it make sense for Goldman Sachs to give the impression that they are for Obama’s policies even though they’re not and never will be? Seems so somedays.
Most of Mr Obama’s economic advisers are linked to GS in some way, either ideologically or physically. There’s the economy you and I live in and then there’s the economy of the financial industry. GS, and the other banksters, will prosper handsomely during this recession while the working class is, for all practical purposes, on the verge of depression.
As a 66 year old, retired former FAA manager, officer in the USAF, with a masters in U.S. History, I guess I’m happy to be an “Obama Fanboy.” I think I’ll go get a T-shirt.
Grab one for me, willya? XL, I like ‘em loose.
Yes sir. Sure will.
Dear Republicans and Blue Dogs
5 years ago my health insurance was much cheaper and I had better coverage. Now I’m barely able to cover my premiums because the out of pocket expenses are killing me. Now if I have to have a routine surgery like an appendectomy I won’t be able to cover the out of pocket expenses and if I have a major illness I could lose my policy altogether.
What’s it going to be like 5 years down the road? Tell me that and then go vote against health care reform.
Joe American
Smalltown USA
Yes, but does anyone know why they voted for it. What are they thinking?
it’s kind of a web slang, internet vernacular.
glad to see all generations represented – srsly!
The Blue Dogs or US the Democratic Wing of the Democratic party?
We are the ones fighting for the social change the GOP fears.
I need to quote this…can you give a primary source…pretty please?
Thanks!
http://content.usatoday.com/to…..rpf982eX/1
http://beltwayblips.dailyradar…..of_health/
http://yubanet.com/usa/CBO-Sco…..m-Bill.php
Last one has the most “meat”
Ask and ye shall receive
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/104…..hr3200.pdf
Here It Is
Here It Is, Again
“At some point Obama had to take ownership of all the difficult things bequeathed to him by America’s most beloved rodeo clown.”
That’s an insult to rodeo clowns, who actually do hard work in the ring. GWB was a cheerleader.
I know, I know, that’s an insult to cheerleaders too.
“Can private insurance really survive if this program is run right?”
I fervently hope not.
I note that Obama talks about “health insurance reform”, not “healthcare reform”. That’s all you need to know.
BTW, I have single payer healthcare here, and I can go to any doctor I choose to. Weird, huh?
The overwhelming majority of Obama’s money came from individual donors, especially $200 and below. He shattered all records for this.
it’s possible that this is true, but we’ll never know for sure. the obama campaign counted stuff like the sale of t-shirts and yard signs and bumper stickers as ‘donations’. no other presidential campaign has ever done this.
It’s not totally unheard of though. I know that Kinky Friedman does/did the same thing in his campaign(s) for governor of Texas.