After a blistering piece by Harold Meyerson at the Washington Post, Organizing for America responds…with a vaguely worded email.
Meyerson had this to say about OFA’s effectiveness in pushing Obama’s agenda:
Major progressive legislation in America is seldom enacted absent a mass movement clamoring for change. The New Deal’s legislative triumphs were the product not merely of Franklin Roosevelt’s political genius but of the political pressure built up by general strikes and wild-eyed campaigns for social insurance. The great civil rights legislation of the 1960s was the product not merely of Lyndon Johnson’s legendary political skills but also of the blood and sweat of a generation of demonstrators in the Jim Crow South.
Obama and his lieutenants, and the leaders of progressive organizations, know this history inside and out. They might have concluded that no equivalent movement exists for universal health care. But the administration’s willingness to limit the potential of its army of supporters and the progressive groups’ unwillingness to try to create a movement (say, for single-payer health care) that goes beyond the administration’s goals have all but ensured that legislators will feel no major pressure for systemic change as Congress crafts national policy. If Obama doesn’t want to use his mega-list to pursue his mega-goal, supporters of universal coverage might ask him, as Abraham Lincoln once asked the notoriously inactive Gen. George McClellan, to borrow his army as long as he isn’t using it.
Late yesterday OFA sent a health care email:
These calls are an easy but powerful way to make a difference. Just tell whoever answers the phone that you’re a constituent (mention what city you’re calling from), and that you’re counting on your representative to support real health care reform, which must:
* Reduce costs
* Guarantee a choice of plans and doctors — including the choice of a robust public insurance option
*Ensure quality, affordable care for every American
The opponents of real reform have deep pockets and insider access, and they’re holding nothing back in their drive to derail progress before the plans go public.
All of this resulted in a rather astute observation from Greg Sargent: “If Obama’s Political Operation Can Pressure Senators, Why Not Liberal Groups?”:
Obama is reported to have said this about liberal groups: “We shouldn’t be focusing resources on each other.” If this is true, it raises the question of why his own political operation should do this, but outside groups shouldn’t.
But it’s also possible that OFA’s efforts show that the White House wants outside pressure on Senators. The groups are doing exactly what OFA is doing: Calling on constituents to demand Senators back a public plan. OFA’s activities make the meme that Obama wants the groups to muzzle themselves seem pretty far fetched.





4 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
It’s interesting that OFA is getting more specific in their requests on the e-mail list.
Single payer is the solution to excessive costs, inefficiency, and what Chuck Grassley called, “Assessability” [sic]. If OFA can’t lobby for the REAL SOLUTION, then even HALF SOLUTIONS are probably going to elude this effort at REFORM by compromise.
Does OFA know that Dianne Feinstein says that liberal activism on health care moves her “not one whit?” Apparently now they want me to call her. And Boxer. Here’s the email I got this morning:
Teddy –
As we speak, key committees in Congress are weighing options and making final decisions about how to tackle health care reform. This could be one of the last opportunities to shape the legislation before it’s written.
The behind-the-scenes committee negotiations aren’t front-page news, but the lobbyists trying to block reform are following every detail, and they won’t miss a day. If the final plan is to uphold President Obama’s principles of reduced costs, guaranteed choice — including a robust public insurance option — and quality care for all, your voice must be heard.
Please call your senators right now and ask them to support President Obama’s three principles for real health care reform. Our records show that you live in California. Please call:
Senior Senator Dianne Feinstein at 202-224-3841
Junior Senator Barbara Boxer at 202-224-3553
Make sure to click here to let us know what happened.
(Not your representatives? Click here to look them up.)
These calls are an easy but powerful way to make a difference. Just tell whoever answers the phone that you’re a constituent (mention what city you’re calling from), and that you’re counting on your senator to support real health care reform, which must:
Reduce costs
Guarantee a choice of plans and doctors — including the choice of a robust public insurance option
Ensure quality, affordable care for every American
The opponents of real reform have deep pockets and insider access, and they’re holding nothing back in their drive to derail progress before the plans go public.
Your call, right now, can help remind your representatives that the American people are counting on them to stand up to special interests and deliver the comprehensive reform we so desperately need.
Thanks for all that you do,
Mitch
Mitch Stewart
Director
Organizing for America
P.S. — These calls are a vital first step. Stay tuned for other critical ways to organize locally and make a difference in this campaign. We can only win this thing if we all work together every step of the way.
I note that OFA is calling for a robust public option but does not mention immediacy/no triggers and gives no specifics about the public plan. I’m afraid that this leaves us open to someone else defining the public plan and because it’s called “public plan” people will support it whether it meets our requirements or not.
When the Progressive Caucus laid out their requirements for a public plan, I was hoping that they would give it a specific name, such as “Progressive Public Plan” or some such unique indentifier. I still hope that someone does this, so that we can call for a specific plan and so that lawmakers know exactly what we’re talking about when we say we support it. It also would allow us to determine whether a congressperson really supports the public plan we’re talking about.
If we don’t do this soon, we leave ourselves open to one of our Congress’ famous compromises and to confusion among the thousands or millions of people we’re trying to organize.