Blanche Lincoln has been spending a lot of time thinking about health care reform, and about that ad Blue America plans to start running in Arkansas asking why she hasn’t committed to a strong public plan that forces insurance companies to shape up or lose market share.
So she’s moving, not to another state, but to another point of view.
Via dday and Digby (and help from Jane, Howie Klein and John Amato), whose efforts helped create the ads Sen. Lincoln doesn’t want to see, here’s the latest letter the Senator sent her constituents (in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette) on what health care reform needs to include. As Digby says, "she’s almost there."
After citing several insurance/health horror stories, Lincoln concludes with this:
Arkansans deserve better.
Health care reform must build upon what works and improve inefficiencies. Individuals should be able to choose from a range of quality health insurance plans.Options should include private plans as well as a quality, affordable public plan or non-profit plan that can accomplish the same goals as those of a public plan.
Coverage alone does not result in access. We must invest in our nation’s health care infrastructure-its providers, technologies and facilities-especially in rural America where health care services and providers are fewer and farther between. We also must deliver health care more efficiently and create incentives that promote high-quality outcomes for patients instead of simply encouraging more provider visits and services.
Above all, we must bring stability to health care. Stable health care coverage will protect Arkansans during tough times and ensure that they do not lose insurance when they get sick. Stable costswill mean that Arkansans will not be subject to large premium increases each year that erode their paychecks. Stable quality of care will ensure that Arkansans have dependable treatment options so they can see a doctor of their choice when they need care.
As we work to reform health care, we must be responsible and pay for reform without adding to the deficit and increasing taxes on hard-working Arkansans.
Unfortunately, opponents of reform, who have no real plan for improving health care, are already using the tired arguments of the past. They say that Congress is trying to create “more government” or a “Washington takeover” of health care, which will raise your taxes, get between you and your doctor, and eliminate private insurance. It’s a strategy that spreads misinformation and generates fear to preserve the status quo. Arkansans should not be misled by those who oppose real reform.
I am under no illusion that achieving meaningful health care reform will be an easy task. However, I am committed to reform because Arkansans must have certainty that if they get sick, they will have options to receive stable, affordable and high-quality health care.
Congress is on the verge of developing a health care policy that will work better for everyone and we cannot afford to let this opportunity slip away. Our health care crisis was not created overnight and it will not be fixed overnight. It will take all of us-individuals, employers, insurers and providers-to share in the responsibility and come together to make this possible. We know that government cannot do it alone. The key is to take what works and make it better for the next generation of Arkansans. We can no longer afford to sit back and do nothing.
There’s hope for Blanche, because there’s lots of good stuff here in addition to the movement on the public plan. Well done, Arkansas. And we’re not done yet.
More: Greg Sargent picks up the story
dday at Digby’s, Pressure works





20 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Who else may we remind in the senate?
If Lincoln can get the message in Arkansas, so can Pryor. Then there’s Joe Lieberman, Ben Nelson, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and Max Baucus, for starters.
It’s fascinating to watch them join us just before they get beat up.
Do they think we aren’ really serious? Do they think the three-quarters of Americans who want a public plan are a mirage? Do they think we won’t follow through? Do they think it’s important to actually see the media buy before they agree with us?
Such odd strategy. So amazing that these people are actually successful in politics, when they seem so incompetent at it. Oh well, let’s keep the pressure on. After all, Blanche was NOT named among the centrist Democrats Obama was quoted as preferring we not go after.
In bold, is your state-level co op cop out.
Now how can Obama explain why targeting “each other” isn’t helpful?
It’s coming down to how you define “accomplish the same goals as those of a public plan.” As Jane has noted, we’ve been pushing three elements — national in scope, available one day one, responsive to Congress — because you have to start somewhere and those are easier to explain. But the progressive caucus is now picking up on other criteria that make the public plan “robust.” These are hopeful signs, but a lot more definition is still needed.
How do we make sure she walks her (new) walk?
Talk is cheap. New ads saying she has starting saying the right things and she needs to know Arkansas is watching to see that she votes for what she says she supports?
Don’t you mean Ho Lieberman, Bent Nelson, Olympia Snowejob, Suspect Collins, and Mixitup Baucus?
This is great news, Scarecrow, thanks for sharing!!!
We have not-for-profit entities in health care now. Unfortunately, for-profit entities make driving the nfp’s out of business one of their first priorities.
BC/BS used to be not-for-profit, and incorporated pretty much on a state-by-state basis. Now, it’s almost entirely for-profit, bought out by holding companies.
Lovelace here in NM was not-for-profit, but was bought out by Cigna to fold into their health-care arm.
For-profit providers don’t want to compete with NFP’s, history proves that.
Yes. It’s a typical non-denial denial.
I hope Blue America calls her bluff and will still run the ads.
The ads start running today. No one is backing off this effort
Speaking of running today – has anyone in the Ft. Smith, Little Rock or Jonesboro areas seen the cable ad yet?
I haven’t seen the ad yet in Fayetteville, and I fear that Lincoln won’t support the robust public option that progressives would like to see. She’s already caved on EFCA and said recently that she wants to allow “private industry to thrive” in healthcare.
Here’s a link to a video from a few days back, when she stopped in Fayetteville:
http://www.kfsm.com/news/kfsm-…..0926.story
Why would people create a not-for-profit and then sell it to a for-profit firm? Seems odd, even a little disturbing.
Where I live there is a hospital which was created and run by Catholics. they sold out in the late ’80s or ’90s and after some time their service declined significantly. Then, out of exasperation I suppose, it was returned to the church and the corporation sailed off into the sunset. It’s a pretty good hospital now. But, I don’t know whether it’s nfp.
A lot depends upon the people running an institution. It isn’t all about the profit motive. [ See Obama as opposed to Bush administrations. ]
Hey, ARDem. So glad you are here to give us local feedback. yes, her appearance in Fayetteville seems a 180 to her oped today…
I dunno if we reach fayetteville this time around, but if you want to write me at (myhandle) at mindspring dot com, i’d really appreciate any feedback you can give me regarding further media placement.
BLUE AMERICA PAC is all of us, working together – that’s what makes us ROCK.
Thanks for the reminder this was BLUE AMERICA, not the ActBlue device. I’ve changed the first paragraph to reflect that. Sorry about the confusion.
Yeah there’s a lot of weasel words and wiggle room in that. The news is that she felt like she had to make the effort, IMHO.
I have to say that was probably the most uninformative news piece I have ever seen. I mean I know they only have a few minutes, but it basically was “Some people think healthcare reform is bad” and basically forced Lincoln to defend herself from the right, where she already is.
At the very least, they should have ALSO mentioned how some Democrats want her to support a more radical type of reform, why won’t she/will she?
I wonder where that Rotten Apple Barbara Mikulski is on this.
She’s up for re-election in 2010.