We’ve been getting a lot of great feedback from FDL readers about what they’re hearing from the Hill on the public option. Here is a sample of the kind of info we’re getting.
Tim F. called Robert Wexler:
"the staff member was adamant that Wexler would not vote for any plan that did not include a public option that was "competitive" and "operating under the same rules as private" insurance. I explained that FDL is trying to get members to commit to pledging not to vote for anything that does not contain the three options, it sounded like the staff felt Wexler would commit."
Jane P. called Rosa DeLauro:
"I was informed that Rosa DeLauro is in favor of a public option. She is committed to voting against a bill that does not contain one."
John C. called Gwen Moore:
"I was on the phone with Saidah for at least ten minutes. She wanted to see FDL’s whip tool, so I walked her through that. She said she would forward it onto the policy staff and she was confident Congresswoman Moore would say it."
Bill B. called Chellie Pingree:
"Anthony said Rep. Pingree is working hard on the issue, he said she may make a statement similar to Rep. Ellison’s. Still, there was no commitment to opposing any bill that does not provide for a public option."
Joan E. called Jim McDermott:
"I was told that Congressman McDermott was working very had in support of a public health care plan. I asked if he would commit to voting against any bill that does not contain a public plan that is "nationwide, available immediately and accountable to Congress and voters." I was told that he will not commit to that specifically."
| Whip Count Day 6 | ||||
| Committed | Leaning Yes | Undecided | Leaning No | Against |
|
|
|
||
We’ve got 4 members of Congress who have taken the pledge, we need 36 more. Call your members of Congress and ask them to take the pledge.





16 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Thanks Marisa
Excellent!
Eternal gratitude from Sweden for doing such a great job with this.
Hi Marisa,
I just posted on Campaign Silo about my conversation with Nadler’s press secretary. Nadler is a definite punt.
Eve
Wexler would not vote for any plan that did not include a public option that was “competitive” and “operating under the same rules as private” insurance.
isn’t that insurance company language? it sounds like the “level playing field” type rhetoric that’s been used to mask moves to cripple the public option by requiring it to charge no less than what private plans charge, removing any ability to negotiate prices, etc.
This is great and urgent stuff, and so was Jane’s excellent work on the supplemental, but allow me to go off topic to pose the question: is there anything we should be doing right now to protest the coup in Honduras? I mean besides just calling up the White House and asking them to condemn? Thanks.
mad props to Jane P and others for whipping DeLauro – mwaaah !
Spoke to an aide in Congresswoman Clarke’s office who couldn’t answer my questions to my satisfaction, so I emailed her Senior Legislative Counsel. I hold Clarke, a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, to a higher standard than the HCAN criteria. FWIW, here’s the body of my email; I’ll let you know what I hear.
I leave messages sometimes to any Congressperson via the toll free switchboard lines at night you can easily google.
It is sad that when you call during the day and are discovered to be outside the constituency you feel like a “second class” citizen and your message is not as “valuable” to them because they do not technically represent you. And many emails for reps won’t allow you to send a note if you are out of zipcode range.
They represent ALL of us. All the time, with their votes and their powerful committee memberships voting for bills that affect everyone in every state. But the message is so QUID PRO QUO even in that. Yes, local issues, state issues, they should listen to their direct constituents, but this stuff, this vote, there is something terribly wrong in being limited to press simply one’s state reps. But it is the way it is. And we can still call and there is still impact from calling. And we should use our industrial strength voice on our own reps at the very least. Let them know we are going to stay vocal and watchful.
4 health care industry lobbyists per representative. $90 million to Dems last election, $65 to Repubs allegedly from health care lobbyists which made the pure universal single payer plan NEVER EVEN SERIOUSLY ON THE TABLE though it is best for the average American sinking fast and who could use that justice, fairness, and security (we are the only industrial country without a universal plan, ranking 37th on the list of best health care … a disgrace for this country).
Thanks to you whipper-snappers, thank you thank you thank you, and I will join today, doing my calling, over and over as much as I can, and this list is so precious. Thanks for doing this leg work and giving us a base camp so that our lone message doesn’t feel like it disappears into the ether, no weight against the corporate-engined toxic to the common good status quo.
Will pass on this site and this list and try to recruit. Time to make these guys walk the walk. The progressive caucus in the Congress that talked the talk and then those who walked away from their anti-enabling of the war pledges. They have escaped unnoticed too long. Talked out of both sides of their mouths too long. Time to tell them we notice and we have long memories and are determined to stay awake and aware. Mike P on Ring of Fire, Air America, referred to the “gutless moderates” the other day. I had that naive hope when Obama came to power, though haunting doubts, that our biggest opponents were obtuse Republicans. Never dreamed the degree of selling out of our own party. Ralph Nader pointed it out long ago. Thought Ralph was being hyperbolic. So not so.
I do still believe in ants moving rubber tree plants and Frank Capra endings. We will prevail eventually if we keep on with the good fight of humanity. Thank you, all.
ps. Pete Seeger said, “Think globally, act locally.” I guess this is it. Doing our part in the big scenario, from our local space. We need to walk the walk ourselves as much as we are asking these reps to.
that single payer was taken off the table — so that the bill, the evidence, the studies, the peer-reviewed publications were not even supposed to be discussed — and instead democrats gave us a slogan with a few talking points (for which even now a year later there is no bill or even actual policy details with evidence & studies to back them up) has me so pissed off and discouraged that some days it’s hard not to despair.
selise, I so relate. and life demands rain down on citizenry as fresh hells of betrayal go on and on setting in motion our futures and the future of America’s children and proving how “shock and awe” is SOP for the American government to foreigners and their own citizens. and we do need to band together with heart and consistency and form our own good-guys lobby. those of us who are really “getting it” are often regarded as inconveniently negative to those who remain in the fog of status quo unearned trust toward a government that is amoral. glad you replied to me. one day, breath, phone call at a time. ll :)
(((ll))) you are very wise. thank you.
selise, at the risk of seeming over-the-top in my cheerleading mode (I spend more time in the despair and/or fog one) here is more of my popping off — my comment from ThatGuy’s recent diary (now I need to do a lot of walking the walk to back up my talking):
http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/5981
Thanks Marissa.
Ya know what’s amazing? A reform public option plan could pay doctors what they want (without the insurance mark-up price), charge precisely the private insurers median price and still give people a much better price than the current system.
How?
A ‘public option’ system will have more customers (forming a larger pool of reserves), particularly younger ones (who aren’t using services much), young ones choosing basic plans (which cost less naturally), paying out less (since doctors don’t really charge what insurers claim), taking in the same as private insurers (which is a lot more than is really needed) and being run by a not-for-profit entity (which leaves more money in the reserves).
It doesn’t require trickery (such as price under-cutting) for this to work exceedingly well.
At some point we’re going to need accountants (or somebody to score this) who can show that in hard numbers.
Not yet. Their constitution might technically allow for this if their Legislature orders it.
We need to know their Law.