Ben Smith on the FDL Action public plan whip effort:
Legislative vote counts are one of those things that the Web can transform. They’re typically closely held — counting is an insider’s art — and deliberate ambiguity is a key negotiating tactic. Legislators who would prefer to vote no, for instance, might be willing to be the last vote, for a price. So while this has the effect of pushing members toward Obama’s position, it also shines a spotlight on members who might prefer to stay uncommitted, or to wait for details and compromises.
We heard this a lot from House offices during the supplemental battle. Having a public list was extremely powerful, and gave people a whole lot less wiggle room. Getting early commitments on record makes it much harder for those with considerable expertise at tipping things in their favor at the last minute — in this case, industry lobbyists — to work their magic.



2 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Jane,
the Public Plan Whip page does not show who is and isn’t a co sponsor – your link shows 83 co-sponsors – would like to know who the 17 are among the Hot 100 are not co sponsors
forgive me if it’s just my crappy home set up that wont show it
am writing a diary on this and who is and isn’t would help
Jane,
I really think you need another requirement to our public plan. I feel we need to require group clout when we bargain with health care institutions and drug companies.
With out this item, there is no requirement that will maintain cost control and insure our plan gets the very best deal possible.
Rick