<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How The Post Tried To Kill Froomkin&#8217;s Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/</link>
	<description>Politics for liberal newsgeeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:08:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whispers</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28779</link>
		<dc:creator>Whispers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fred Hiatt has no credibility left whatsoever.  It is clear that he views his mission in life to promote conservative views takes precedence over any serious journalistic duties owed to his readers.  This is something we have seen time and time again, most notably when his ombudsman mocked readers while defending error-filled writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Hiatt has no credibility left whatsoever.  It is clear that he views his mission in life to promote conservative views takes precedence over any serious journalistic duties owed to his readers.  This is something we have seen time and time again, most notably when his ombudsman mocked readers while defending error-filled writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dakine01</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28715</link>
		<dc:creator>dakine01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28715</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you are mixing the new publisher up with her mother (Lally Weymouth) is Kay Graham’s daughter and Donald’s sister.  Katherine Weymouth, the new publisher, is Kay Graham’s granddaughter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are mixing the new publisher up with her mother (Lally Weymouth) is Kay Graham’s daughter and Donald’s sister.  Katherine Weymouth, the new publisher, is Kay Graham’s granddaughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauimom</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauimom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28709</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Katharine Weymouth became publisher of The Washington Post and chief executive officer of Washington Post Media, a new unit that includes The Washington Post and washingtonpost.com&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those who might be confused by the last name, “Katerine Weymouth” is Katherine Graham’s daughter, sister to the numbskull Donald Graham.  She and her lack of talent have also perched at Newsweek — a publication owned by WaPoo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And yes, Buffett still owns a hunk of WaPoo stock.  He generally maintains a “buy it; let management run it” style of investment.  I’d sure hope this fiasco would prompt him to dump a bunch — if not all — of the stock.  He &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; done that before, but it takes an atom bomb to get him to do so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Katharine Weymouth became publisher of The Washington Post and chief executive officer of Washington Post Media, a new unit that includes The Washington Post and washingtonpost.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For those who might be confused by the last name, “Katerine Weymouth” is Katherine Graham’s daughter, sister to the numbskull Donald Graham.  She and her lack of talent have also perched at Newsweek — a publication owned by WaPoo.</p>
<p>And yes, Buffett still owns a hunk of WaPoo stock.  He generally maintains a “buy it; let management run it” style of investment.  I’d sure hope this fiasco would prompt him to dump a bunch — if not all — of the stock.  He <em>has</em> done that before, but it takes an atom bomb to get him to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitewidow</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28706</link>
		<dc:creator>whitewidow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’ll chime in, too. Back when I became aware of Froomkin, it was through links from bloggers. I had the same problem as other posters trying to find his column. For that reason, I didn’t have it bookmarked like many others I enjoy reading regularly, but almost exclusively looked at it only when others highlighted a post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Partly laziness on my part, not bothering to track it down, but pretty telling on WaPo’s part, because I’m a heavy online news/commentary reader, exactly the person they should be making it easy for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s really no other reason to go there, save for about 2 real reporters. I’ll just read their work indirectly, so I’m done with WaPo. Hiatt sucks. The editorial page super sucks. I won’t miss anything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McClatchy is worlds better. So is TPM.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll chime in, too. Back when I became aware of Froomkin, it was through links from bloggers. I had the same problem as other posters trying to find his column. For that reason, I didn’t have it bookmarked like many others I enjoy reading regularly, but almost exclusively looked at it only when others highlighted a post.</p>
<p>Partly laziness on my part, not bothering to track it down, but pretty telling on WaPo’s part, because I’m a heavy online news/commentary reader, exactly the person they should be making it easy for.</p>
<p>There’s really no other reason to go there, save for about 2 real reporters. I’ll just read their work indirectly, so I’m done with WaPo. Hiatt sucks. The editorial page super sucks. I won’t miss anything.</p>
<p>McClatchy is worlds better. So is TPM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trakker</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28705</link>
		<dc:creator>Trakker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28705</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A couple of points.  I read washingtonpost.com every day (or did before the Froomkin firing).  A link to Froomkin’s column was frequently  included on the front page in the box with links to that day’s op-ed pundits.  In fact by 2007 his link was there almost every day (every day that he posted a column that is).  Like many of you I read him every day and so did everyone else I knew.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then during the long presidential campaign my interests changed. I was less interested in Bush and more interested in the primaries and the presidential race.  I rarely read Froomkin during this period, and even for the first two months after the inauguration.  During this time I hardly ever saw a link to Froomkin on the WaPo’s front page. Lately I have started reading him again and I started seeing the links to his column appear again on the front page (probably at Dan’s insistence).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second point. In Hiatt’s explanation of Froomkin’s firing he says “…the decision not to renew Dan’s contract–which was not made by me, but which I supported…”  Who DID make the decision?  Dick Cheney?  Seriously, who is Fred Hiatt taking orders from?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And who IS Fred Hiatt? I can find very little on a quick Internet search (compare his Wikipedia page to Froomkin’s BTW), but from what I can find his resume at the time he was chosen editor of the editorial page is much thinner than Froomkin’s is right now (however Hiatt has authored two children’s books which Froomkin evidently has not).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for traffic to Froomkin’s site, be careful about comparing his traffic to traffic to Krauthammer’s and other RW columnists. If you’ve ever read the comments to Krauthammer’s, and others, columns you will recognize that a lot of liberals read their columns and then rip them apart in the comments section. Much of this traffic is pushed to those columns by liberal bloggers who highlight the idiocy found in the columns.  I suspect much of the traffic to those columns comes from liberals and that traffic  might push their numbers above the traffic to Froomkin’s column.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have scrubbed the Post from my browser and will only rarely visit (for local news only). I will not link to it in my blog and I encourage everyone else to boycott it as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points.  I read washingtonpost.com every day (or did before the Froomkin firing).  A link to Froomkin’s column was frequently  included on the front page in the box with links to that day’s op-ed pundits.  In fact by 2007 his link was there almost every day (every day that he posted a column that is).  Like many of you I read him every day and so did everyone else I knew.</p>
<p>Then during the long presidential campaign my interests changed. I was less interested in Bush and more interested in the primaries and the presidential race.  I rarely read Froomkin during this period, and even for the first two months after the inauguration.  During this time I hardly ever saw a link to Froomkin on the WaPo’s front page. Lately I have started reading him again and I started seeing the links to his column appear again on the front page (probably at Dan’s insistence).</p>
<p>Second point. In Hiatt’s explanation of Froomkin’s firing he says “…the decision not to renew Dan’s contract–which was not made by me, but which I supported…”  Who DID make the decision?  Dick Cheney?  Seriously, who is Fred Hiatt taking orders from?</p>
<p>And who IS Fred Hiatt? I can find very little on a quick Internet search (compare his Wikipedia page to Froomkin’s BTW), but from what I can find his resume at the time he was chosen editor of the editorial page is much thinner than Froomkin’s is right now (however Hiatt has authored two children’s books which Froomkin evidently has not).</p>
<p>As for traffic to Froomkin’s site, be careful about comparing his traffic to traffic to Krauthammer’s and other RW columnists. If you’ve ever read the comments to Krauthammer’s, and others, columns you will recognize that a lot of liberals read their columns and then rip them apart in the comments section. Much of this traffic is pushed to those columns by liberal bloggers who highlight the idiocy found in the columns.  I suspect much of the traffic to those columns comes from liberals and that traffic  might push their numbers above the traffic to Froomkin’s column.</p>
<p>I have scrubbed the Post from my browser and will only rarely visit (for local news only). I will not link to it in my blog and I encourage everyone else to boycott it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptonomist</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28704</link>
		<dc:creator>skeptonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That Froomkin’s blog/column was buried by the WaPo has been obvious for a long time.  Also, the supposed dispute about whether Froomkin was a “reporter” or an “opinion writer” is completely phony - why didn’t they just give him a column - is there a dispute about whether Krauthammer, Gerson et al are “reporters”?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Probably the WaPo kept Froomkin on as long as they did because it allowed them to say they publish a range of opinion.  Eugene Robinson also serves the same purpose (of course the Post dare not fire him because of his recent Pulitzer), but he is syndicated so you don’t have to give the WaPo any hits to read him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Froomkin’s blog/column was buried by the WaPo has been obvious for a long time.  Also, the supposed dispute about whether Froomkin was a “reporter” or an “opinion writer” is completely phony &#8211; why didn’t they just give him a column &#8211; is there a dispute about whether Krauthammer, Gerson et al are “reporters”?</p>
<p>Probably the WaPo kept Froomkin on as long as they did because it allowed them to say they publish a range of opinion.  Eugene Robinson also serves the same purpose (of course the Post dare not fire him because of his recent Pulitzer), but he is syndicated so you don’t have to give the WaPo any hits to read him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acharn</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28703</link>
		<dc:creator>Acharn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28703</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Me too! Aalthough before I bookmarked him (and after they changed the location) I was able to find his column through the WaPo’s search function. Well, I won’t shun the WaPo, but I won’t be reading their columnists as much.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too! Aalthough before I bookmarked him (and after they changed the location) I was able to find his column through the WaPo’s search function. Well, I won’t shun the WaPo, but I won’t be reading their columnists as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eggroll</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28702</link>
		<dc:creator>eggroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28702</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When private investigators are asked to find evidence of a spouse’s infidelity, a good PI just says “Keep your money” as the cheated spouse already has a good idea what the answer is. Determining the vindictiveness or bogosity of Fred Hiatt’s excuses is largely irrelevant. Froomkin and his audience will soon find each other again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When private investigators are asked to find evidence of a spouse’s infidelity, a good PI just says “Keep your money” as the cheated spouse already has a good idea what the answer is. Determining the vindictiveness or bogosity of Fred Hiatt’s excuses is largely irrelevant. Froomkin and his audience will soon find each other again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SparklestheIguana</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28700</link>
		<dc:creator>SparklestheIguana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28700</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What’s much more important than Froomkin?  What’s on the WaPo front page right now:  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Talented Furry Friends&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Pet Tricks &#124; Is your pet ready to be an Internet sensation? Then send us video of its best tricks - this piano-playing border collie already did&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s much more important than Froomkin?  What’s on the WaPo front page right now:  </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Talented Furry Friends</strong><br />
Pet Tricks | Is your pet ready to be an Internet sensation? Then send us video of its best tricks &#8211; this piano-playing border collie already did</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prairie Sunshine</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-28699</link>
		<dc:creator>Prairie Sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/20/froomkins-traffic/#comment-28699</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Take heart, pups, I’m sure Kurtz will reliably set the story straight and scold those WaPoofools first thing on Sunday morning.  Yep.  You betcha.  Also.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take heart, pups, I’m sure Kurtz will reliably set the story straight and scold those WaPoofools first thing on Sunday morning.  Yep.  You betcha.  Also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
