<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What We Learned from the Supplemental: If Obama Wants a Public Plan, the Blue Dogs Will Do It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/</link>
	<description>Politics for liberal newsgeeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:24:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: newtonusr</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28365</link>
		<dc:creator>newtonusr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28365</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ma’am, please explain how everything you have said could NOT have been written in the bowels of the White House communications office, particularly the lashing of “&lt;strong&gt;extremists&lt;/strong&gt;” and “&lt;strong&gt;castrators&lt;/strong&gt;” and ”&lt;strong&gt;fringe minority&lt;/strong&gt;”  and “&lt;strong&gt;disgraceful&lt;/strong&gt;” and “&lt;strong&gt;intellectually humiliated&lt;/strong&gt;” and those with “&lt;strong&gt;a blood lust and insatiable thirst for revenge among Bush-Cheney haters&lt;/strong&gt;” you seem so compelled to reform here. There is nothing democratic, or Democratic about any of these slurs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You have no point, except to be a mouthpiece. Flat out - how much does it pay? I mean it - How much?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any real Liberal, any real Progressive, any real citizen would not resort to such gross name-calling as a defense of their political stance - &lt;strong&gt;they could let the ideas carry their arguments, carry their position&lt;/strong&gt;, without resorting to slurs and slanderous charges of anti-Americanism, as you have.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are a flack for Rahm Emanuel, likely not worth anyone’s time. There is no dialog to be had with a brick wall.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ma’am, please explain how everything you have said could NOT have been written in the bowels of the White House communications office, particularly the lashing of “<strong>extremists</strong>” and “<strong>castrators</strong>” and ”<strong>fringe minority</strong>”  and “<strong>disgraceful</strong>” and “<strong>intellectually humiliated</strong>” and those with “<strong>a blood lust and insatiable thirst for revenge among Bush-Cheney haters</strong>” you seem so compelled to reform here. There is nothing democratic, or Democratic about any of these slurs.</p>
<p>You have no point, except to be a mouthpiece. Flat out &#8211; how much does it pay? I mean it &#8211; How much?</p>
<p>Any real Liberal, any real Progressive, any real citizen would not resort to such gross name-calling as a defense of their political stance &#8211; <strong>they could let the ideas carry their arguments, carry their position</strong>, without resorting to slurs and slanderous charges of anti-Americanism, as you have.</p>
<p>You are a flack for Rahm Emanuel, likely not worth anyone’s time. There is no dialog to be had with a brick wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redfish</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28361</link>
		<dc:creator>redfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28361</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not a clue where you are going - never mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a clue where you are going &#8211; never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28319</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28319</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28317</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28317</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Read Jane’s latest. She quotes Obama quoting FDR: “make me do it.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read Jane’s latest. She quotes Obama quoting FDR: “make me do it.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProgThis</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28316</link>
		<dc:creator>ProgThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28316</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;she’s already stated that she isn’t running for that seat (although, i guess, she could change her mind)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she’s already stated that she isn’t running for that seat (although, i guess, she could change her mind)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zapkitty</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28300</link>
		<dc:creator>zapkitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28300</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All this “mandated buy” shit is just making the insurance corpocrats salivate in anticipation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What they see is a way to force everyone to buy the crap pseudo-coverage that you get from infomercials… or make the government buy it for you if you are unemployed etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THEY HAVE DETERMINED THAT THIS IS ALL THAT THEY WILL OFFER UNDER ANY VERSION OF A “PUBLIC PLAN”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The corporate Dems will promise that &lt;em&gt;“Of course we won’t allow that! There will be, like, controls and regulations and stuff!”&lt;/em&gt; … and they will be lying. And they will know they are lying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the rest of the Dems will acquiesce.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So no. Obama will not do health care reform. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And we’ll still be in Iraq and Afghanistan come 2011 &lt;em&gt;“But this time we’ll be out real soon now!”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the self-admitted war criminals will still be walking free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the behemoth banking clusterfucks will be gleefully trying to inflate the next bubble even as Obama’s foolish pre-election anti-stimulus “compromise” bills on behalf of Rethugs Inc. send the country deeper into depression. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the corporations will still be throttling effective climate control change after the Arctic ice cap disappears for the summer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And then 2011 with Daily Kos triumphantly blasting &lt;strong&gt;“Hey! It’s the corporate Dems or crazed Rethug wingnuts salivating for another go!… Choose!” &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prospects are not hopeless, but they are not good.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emergency venting complete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW… sure, [s]Rahm’s clerk[/s] -er- redfish is stupid enough to wave around a badly flawed Gallup poll… and Emanuel as well… but Obama? &lt;em&gt;That&lt;/em&gt; ignorant?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this “mandated buy” shit is just making the insurance corpocrats salivate in anticipation.</p>
<p>What they see is a way to force everyone to buy the crap pseudo-coverage that you get from infomercials… or make the government buy it for you if you are unemployed etc.</p>
<p>THEY HAVE DETERMINED THAT THIS IS ALL THAT THEY WILL OFFER UNDER ANY VERSION OF A “PUBLIC PLAN”</p>
<p>The corporate Dems will promise that <em>“Of course we won’t allow that! There will be, like, controls and regulations and stuff!”</em> … and they will be lying. And they will know they are lying.</p>
<p>And the rest of the Dems will acquiesce.</p>
<p>So no. Obama will not do health care reform. </p>
<p>And we’ll still be in Iraq and Afghanistan come 2011 <em>“But this time we’ll be out real soon now!”</em></p>
<p>And the self-admitted war criminals will still be walking free.</p>
<p>And the behemoth banking clusterfucks will be gleefully trying to inflate the next bubble even as Obama’s foolish pre-election anti-stimulus “compromise” bills on behalf of Rethugs Inc. send the country deeper into depression. </p>
<p>And the corporations will still be throttling effective climate control change after the Arctic ice cap disappears for the summer.</p>
<p>And then 2011 with Daily Kos triumphantly blasting <strong>“Hey! It’s the corporate Dems or crazed Rethug wingnuts salivating for another go!… Choose!” </strong></p>
<p>The prospects are not hopeless, but they are not good.</p>
<p>Emergency venting complete.</p>
<p>BTW… sure, [s]Rahm’s clerk[/s] -er- redfish is stupid enough to wave around a badly flawed Gallup poll… and Emanuel as well… but Obama? <em>That</em> ignorant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProgThis</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28299</link>
		<dc:creator>ProgThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28299</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;If Obama does the same on healthcare,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that’s a regular knee-slapper.  of course he won’t whip for a public option. in fact, i’ll lay odds that whatever bill gets passed and signed into law will be worse than if no law had been passed to begin with.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If Obama does the same on healthcare,</i></p>
<p>that’s a regular knee-slapper.  of course he won’t whip for a public option. in fact, i’ll lay odds that whatever bill gets passed and signed into law will be worse than if no law had been passed to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28297</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OT there is a fairly amazing chart at Calculated Risk which shows how much money ($6.788 trillion) the government has extended to the financial industry and how much it has pledged (nearly $14 trillion) to date.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/139-trillion-total-maximum-government.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog......nment.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The eye opener for me was that nearly half of the credit so far extended ($3.2 trillion) has been to money markets.  Even stranger is that this is an estimate because, apparently, the people at Treasury don’t even know how much they have lent out.  This raises the question though of what the government and the money markets have been doing with this money.  I have kept hearing that money markets have something like $4 trillion on the sidelines that the government was hoping to use to re-inflate the economy.  Is all of this money simply money the government itself gave to the MMs?  I don’t know what the story is but there certainly seems to be a story there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT there is a fairly amazing chart at Calculated Risk which shows how much money ($6.788 trillion) the government has extended to the financial industry and how much it has pledged (nearly $14 trillion) to date.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/06/139-trillion-total-maximum-government.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.calculatedriskblog&#8230;&#8230;nment.html</a></p>
<p>The eye opener for me was that nearly half of the credit so far extended ($3.2 trillion) has been to money markets.  Even stranger is that this is an estimate because, apparently, the people at Treasury don’t even know how much they have lent out.  This raises the question though of what the government and the money markets have been doing with this money.  I have kept hearing that money markets have something like $4 trillion on the sidelines that the government was hoping to use to re-inflate the economy.  Is all of this money simply money the government itself gave to the MMs?  I don’t know what the story is but there certainly seems to be a story there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann in AZ</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28295</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann in AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Selise, Bravo had the episode with debate between the Presidential candidates from West Wing on this morning!  I wish you had heard it.  Liberal Dem candidate, Matt Santos, said that he idealized a healthcare program wherein you simply remove the age limit on Medicare.  This is also my ideal program, except that Medicare really does have to renegotiate some of their rates.  My understanding is that they are currently using rates from the year 2000.  However, the way I see it, if all were enrolled in Medicare, and everybody pays something, it fixes Medicare (because everyone on it is no longer old and sick!) and the young and healthy are also insured.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The way I see it, the government already pays for all those who end up in the hospital or the emergency room through one program or another.  Except, of course, for those people who do not complete the proper paperwork for the government to compensate the hospital room or ER, in which case the entity providing the service eats their bill.  Ultimately, we all pay anyway, so the only difference is, under one scenario, all contribute; under the other scenario, only those that have been willing to submit to the system pay.  Frequently, the young and healthy are unwilling or at least wary about submitting to the system until/unless they need it.  Then they, like everyone else, is there with their hands out saying that common decency and just by virtue of the fact that they’re human they are “entitled” to medical assistance when they need it, just as they may need a safety net with food and perhaps shelter in it.  So they avail themselves of those safety net measures which our society has decided are right and good, like social security, like unemployment compensation, like food stamps, aid to dependent children, medicaid, public schools, even the interstate road system.  Then they go out and rail against a society that is “socialized,” like that’s a bad thing.  Too bad people don’t realize that “socialized” means more highly civilized.  Too bad people today don’t seem to have time to ponder what it means to be civilized.  Some of us don’t seem to care to evolve!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selise, Bravo had the episode with debate between the Presidential candidates from West Wing on this morning!  I wish you had heard it.  Liberal Dem candidate, Matt Santos, said that he idealized a healthcare program wherein you simply remove the age limit on Medicare.  This is also my ideal program, except that Medicare really does have to renegotiate some of their rates.  My understanding is that they are currently using rates from the year 2000.  However, the way I see it, if all were enrolled in Medicare, and everybody pays something, it fixes Medicare (because everyone on it is no longer old and sick!) and the young and healthy are also insured.  </p>
<p>The way I see it, the government already pays for all those who end up in the hospital or the emergency room through one program or another.  Except, of course, for those people who do not complete the proper paperwork for the government to compensate the hospital room or ER, in which case the entity providing the service eats their bill.  Ultimately, we all pay anyway, so the only difference is, under one scenario, all contribute; under the other scenario, only those that have been willing to submit to the system pay.  Frequently, the young and healthy are unwilling or at least wary about submitting to the system until/unless they need it.  Then they, like everyone else, is there with their hands out saying that common decency and just by virtue of the fact that they’re human they are “entitled” to medical assistance when they need it, just as they may need a safety net with food and perhaps shelter in it.  So they avail themselves of those safety net measures which our society has decided are right and good, like social security, like unemployment compensation, like food stamps, aid to dependent children, medicaid, public schools, even the interstate road system.  Then they go out and rail against a society that is “socialized,” like that’s a bad thing.  Too bad people don’t realize that “socialized” means more highly civilized.  Too bad people today don’t seem to have time to ponder what it means to be civilized.  Some of us don’t seem to care to evolve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redfish</title>
		<link>http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-28294</link>
		<dc:creator>redfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/17/what-we-learned-from-the-supplemental-if-obama-wants-a-public-plan-the-blue-dogs-will-do-it/#comment-28294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have no idea what you are talking about I never said anything about the date.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what you are talking about I never said anything about the date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
