Comments on: Jan Schakowsky: No Statement On Supplemental Until After the Vote http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/ Politics for liberal newsgeeks Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:45 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Danno11 http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27781 Danno11 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:45:07 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27781 <p>Rep. Lynch from Massachusetts…same thing. Frankly, you only say this if you’ve decided to vote for the bill and don’t want to tell anyone. And Lynch also signed the 2007 Out of Iraq pledge letter.</p> Rep. Lynch from Massachusetts…same thing. Frankly, you only say this if you’ve decided to vote for the bill and don’t want to tell anyone. And Lynch also signed the 2007 Out of Iraq pledge letter.

]]> By: Siun http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27768 Siun Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:51:57 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27768 <p>I’m disgusted. So much for progressive leadership Rep Shakowsky.</p> I’m disgusted. So much for progressive leadership Rep Shakowsky.

]]> By: dakine01 http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27762 dakine01 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:53:13 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27762 <p>The only reason I can see for a post vote statement is attempting to justify a “Yes” vote on this bill.</p> The only reason I can see for a post vote statement is attempting to justify a “Yes” vote on this bill.

]]> By: Teddy Partridge http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27755 Teddy Partridge Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:15:38 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27755 <p>Lady, we don’t care what you say AFTER the vote. That’s kinda the point, y’know?</p> <p><strong>Keep<br /> Your<br /> Promise</strong></p> Lady, we don’t care what you say AFTER the vote. That’s kinda the point, y’know?

Keep
Your
Promise

]]> By: hwmnbn http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27749 hwmnbn Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:56:41 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27749 <p>Jan has been normally very forthcoming in TV interviews. She’s already withdrawn from the Burris Senate seat race. What exactly in this bill is causing her to back away from her pledge? </p> <p>I don’t get it, this should be a no-brainer for progressive dems.</p> Jan has been normally very forthcoming in TV interviews. She’s already withdrawn from the Burris Senate seat race. What exactly in this bill is causing her to back away from her pledge?

I don’t get it, this should be a no-brainer for progressive dems.

]]> By: Phoenix Woman http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27748 Phoenix Woman Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:56:00 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/06/15/jan-schakowsky-no-statement-on-supplemental-until-after-the-vote/#comment-27748 <p>If the supplemental bill is defeated, what does the Pentagon say comes next? Are they pitching a <a href="http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2004/11/chosin-ii.html" rel="nofollow">Chosin Reservoir</a> scenario (or a frantic people-grabbing-the-last-chopper-off-the embassy-roof scenario) to frighten Rahm and Obama and Reid and Pelosi?</p> <p>Is this money to fund a withdrawal, or to stick around, or what?</p> If the supplemental bill is defeated, what does the Pentagon say comes next? Are they pitching a Chosin Reservoir scenario (or a frantic people-grabbing-the-last-chopper-off-the embassy-roof scenario) to frighten Rahm and Obama and Reid and Pelosi?

Is this money to fund a withdrawal, or to stick around, or what?

]]>