Comments on: Democrats & Republicans Targeted By Clunkers

By: Eureka Springs

Eureka Springs — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:57:19 +0000

Let’s see.. If I get a tax credit for my clunker.. I can kill more Afghani’s too?

By: DCXopher

DCXopher — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:56:27 +0000

Can someone please explain to me how Iago, er, Rahm can promise (Promise!) that the DCCC will go easy on anyone, since he is not affiliated with them at all? Talk about hubris! Perhaps he should marry an Afghani cheiftain’s daughter.

By: ratfood

ratfood — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:51:09 +0000

Obama needs to tell Rahm to go sleep in another tent.

I don’t often laugh out loud but that one got me.

If Rahm hasn’t given Obama a case of buyer’s remorse yet I can’t imagine what it will take.

By: Eureka Springs

Eureka Springs — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:45:32 +0000

I think I will sleep under the stars tonight.. Rahm’s tent has mildew.

By: Teddy Partridge

Teddy Partridge — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:46:18 +0000

Obama needs to tell Rahm to go sleep in another tent.

Maybe if the supplemental loses, Rahm will have to resign?

By: NelsonAlgren

NelsonAlgren — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:34:27 +0000

Because Rahm isn’t all he’s cracked up to be.

By: Teddy Partridge

Teddy Partridge — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:23:12 +0000

I don’t understand why Cash for Clunkers needs to be tacked onto the Supplemental if it already passed. Why not add a repeal of DADT? Why not add a repeal of DOMA? Why not add Hate Crimes and ENDA?

If this is a kitchen-sink bill, can the gays get in on the action?