Earlier this week, MinnPost’s Eric Black was optimistic that Norm Coleman really wasn’t going to try to wring every last little bit of delay from the Senate contest endgame:
It will be of modest interest to note how many of the 10 days Team Coleman takes to file. He has said on the radio that he will not need 10 days. It is just a notice, which can be filled out quickly and easily, not the appeal brief.
Many Dems have stated, as if it were a proven fact, that Coleman knows he cannot win and is continuing the case solely and despicably to delay the inevitable seating of Franken. I am aware of no evidence to support this fairly serious allegation of abuse of process. Coleman did not take the maximum 10 days after the Canvassing Board’s final action to file his notice of contest — in fact he filed it on Day One. His trial team could easily have dragged the contest trial out longer by putting more invididual voters on the stand, and, in fact, Team C seems to have blundered by not doing so. Certainly, it was not a decision consistent with a strategy of maximum delay. If Coleman waits until day 10 to file his notice, I will consider that the first dilatory tactic. If he files in the first days of the window, will his critics concede that he has passed up a chance to delay the case further?
Well, the smart money says he’s going to be more dilatory than prompt. According to The UpTake this morning, Coleman’s spokesperson, Bogus Ben Ginsberg, is already saying that the appeal may not be filed until next week.
Meanwhile, speaking of dragging things out: The Texas Kazeminy case is being pushed back another month, even as Norm tells us all not to read too much into his refusal to discuss whether or not the FBI’s been talking to him about it.




6 Comments
Spotlight



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
PW, that picture almost makes me wonder if mAnn Coulter and Norma were separated at birth. Yech!
I’m not as sanguine as you are about whether Coleman/GOPers are dragging this out on purpose or not. A few days here or there in testimony or on short filing deadlines I don’t think makes or breaks the case for that. In fact, by filing right away on a short deadline makes it seem that they aren’t dragging things out – when in fact the whole process itself is dragging things out for no reason.
While they may file an ‘intent to appeal’ right away, that just starts another clock ticking. They have 15 days after that to prepare their briefs, and they said they are going to ‘take their time and be careful’. That tells me they might/will take the whole 15 days for that portion.
The Franken team will have their brief ready before Coleman’s bunch gets out of the starting blocks. All they have to do is say Rolvaag vs Anderson over and over. Ha!
Here’s a new poll — Minnesotans are telling Norm to GIVE UP ALREADY.
Heh!
I wonder if Coleman is delaying the Kazeminy case by prolonging the appeals.
And now Jane tells us that The Usual Suspects of Moneyed Douchebaggery — the Chamber of Commerce, the NFIC, et cetera — are promising to raise tons of money for Norm’s legal battles.
You know, I wish they would cough up tens of millions of dollars for Norm. I really do. Because coughing it up for something that is really starting to piss off even us normally-patient Minnesotans will not only NOT make Norm Coleman a senator again, but it’s also just the perfect recipe for guaranteeing that Tim Pawlenty loses his bid to stay on as governor next year — which means that a Democrat gets to decide which of Minnesota’s congressional districts goes bye-bye after the 2010 census is done. (Hint: Michele Bachmann shouldn’t get too comfy.)
News in Upstate New York is that Tedisco is rapidly losing ground on Murphy, as well.
http://www.politickerny.com/comment/reply/3100
And this is based upon the Foreign and Military Absentee ballots, which have been fully counted in the most conservative counties (Sarasota). Many are still out in Columbia, Dutchess, Essex and Rensselaer Counties…but with a partial count these areas are bringing in Foreign/Military Absentees for Murphy at a 57% ratio to Tedisco’s 42%.
I’d say that Tedisco’s goose is cooked. There are still many challenged ballots to count, but Tedisco (like Coleman) went wild on those…while Murphy’s challenges were far fewer and based on real legally defensible grounds. Heck, he even challenged Gilliland for submitting an absentee ballot! There were also 1200 ballots that the Democrats contended were falsely challenged…these are being opened and counted under the Judges ruling.