I was wondering what was taking the Election Contest Court so long to issue their ruling in the wake of the final vote count last Tuesday. Now I know why. They were crafting a 24-karat platinum boot to be sent upside the head of Norm Coleman.

The Table of Contents tells much of the story, especially the Conclusions of Law. Page Twenty-Seven features the judgment, which is as follows:

– Coleman’s contest is dismissed with prejudice.
— Franken’s counterclaims are dismissed as well, but without prejudice since they were rendered moot anyway.
— Coleman is on the hook for all court costs of the contest, and Franken’s team and the ECC will be sending Norm their respective bills.
— Franken gets to tell Norm how much Norm owes him for that little witness-tampering stunt Team Coleman tried to pull with Pamela Howell.

Oh, and the ECC’s response to the equal-protection argument of Team Coleman? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Stop it, Norm, you’re killin’ us.

The whole thing is a very controlled affair, but none the less vicious for that. The 68-page document could have been written by the Franken team. Hell, in fact Sara, the legal eagle who was around for Andersen v. Rolvaag in the 1960s, predicted that the ECC, and later the MN SC, would be using Franken’s arguments as a template for their decisions — and in the ECC’s case at least, she’s right.

Speaking of Al Franken, here’s some of what he had to say yesterday evening:   "And so, I want to say a word to those on both sides of the aisle who have followed every twist and turn of the recount and contest, whether it was on the Uptake’s live blog or a discussion with friends in a coffee shop, whether it was with patience or frustration: Let’s not forget why this election mattered."