As mentioned yesterday, the Coleman portion of Operation Stonewall is so lame that even some conservative voices are calling Norm out on continuing it. One conservative voice that has consistently departed from the GOP herd in criticizing the Coleman legal team’s strategy, if not their goals, has been Powerline blogger Scott Johnson. In this piece for National Review (h/t Polinaut and Polanimal), he sorrowfully tells his fellow cons that not only didn’t Al Franken "steal" the election, but that Norm Coleman’s legal team lost it for Norm right from the get-go:
From the outset of the post-election process, the Coleman campaign was remarkably passive in its approach to the recount. The Coleman team appeared to improvise strategy from day to day and spent time spinning the Franken campaign’s activities. They did not appear to have a handle on what was happening or on what was likely to happen. I found getting information from the Coleman team like pulling teeth. For a while I thought they were withholding information for some reason. By the end of the recount, I concluded that they simply didn’t know what was happening.
Until the conclusion of the recount, Coleman acted a bit like an NFL team sitting on a two-point lead in the closing minutes of the fourth quarter. He could have been much more aggressive in protecting his position in the days after November 5. And to vary the analogy, the attorneys who publicly led Coleman’s team through the recount (local lawyers Fritz Knaak and Tony Trimble) appeared like Pop Warner players going up against an NFL team. When Coleman filed the election contest challenging the result of the recount, he brought in a new lawyer — the respected local criminal-defense attorney Joe Friedberg — to represent him in the election-contest trial. This has not proved a winning formula.
Translation: Fritz Knaak and Tony Trimble suck rocks, and no amount of hallway spinning by Bogus Ben Ginsberg, or late-game triage by Joe Friedberg, can compensate for their suckitude. (Friedberg’s the guy for whom I feel the sorriest. He’s a very good trial lawyer stuck with a client who is being told to do things that simply aren’t in his best interests, and a legal team that doesn’t bat an eye at witness tampering such as they did with Ms. Pamela Howell — an incident which I notice Johnson avoids mentioning.)
Meanwhile, in other news: Minnesota governor Smilin’ Tim Pawlenty denies that he’s being pressured by Republicans in Washington to prolong the election contest. Let me just say that I’m a tad skeptical here. In any event, he knows what they would expect of him, even without being told — and he knows they know that he wants to be on the 2012 presidential ticket. But of course they’re not going to say any of this out loud.




20 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Thanks PW and good morning. You have done a terrific job covering this sorry mess.
Do you think that frustration in MN with the Republican stonewalling will overflow and hurt other Repub. candidates in MN in 2010?
Thanks.
“(Friedberg’s the guy for whom I feel the sorriest…”
PW, I understand you’re being sympathetic, but please don’t waste it on these douchebags. Friedberg made his bed, now he’s shackled to it.
And, as always, thank you for these updates and your great work with this MN situation.
Mornin’, lilysmom!
It’s really pretty simple: The Republicans are already on thin ice as it is. The more they stonewall, the worse off they’ll be. The key for the Dems is to get decent candidates out there, something they’ve had trouble doing in recent years. In addition, the remaining GOP districts are pretty hardcore and were gerrymandered to be so. This is why getting a strong candidate for governor is — or should be — the DFL’s chief priority right now, as that way they can insure that, when it comes time for Minnesota to lose a CD, the one that goes away is Michele Bachmann’s.
Sweet! bwhahahahaha, although the political entertainment level will go down substantially.
Hi, PW!
I didn’t see the whole segment, but Timmy was on Rachel Maddow last night spewing all the old tired talking points that the courts have rejected as if they’re still “live” issues. Wonder if Rachel knows about the uptake blog?
FunnyDiva
I live in CD 6. If Bachmann goes away (mumbling prayer-like noises) and Franken is still not seated, do I have to pay taxes?
Hello Peeps!
I vote no, and since I’m Supreme Ruler what I say goes.
I hope she does!
Does anyone know when the ten day clock for an appeal started running or has it yet? Is the Coleman campaign going to have to post a bond for the costs of the lawsuit?
Or maybe, Franken won fair and square, and no amount of fancy lawyerin’ could have changed the outcome.
Since when does voting have anything to do with it? ;)
The ten-day clock won’t start until the ECC comes out with a ruling — scuttlebutt said it was going to be today, but now it sounds like the judges won’t rule today (something to do with Passover apparently).
so Ramesh didn’t get the Cornyn fax ?
what happened to all that vaunted “message discipline®” ???
bwaaahaaahaaa
The Republicans are already on thin ice as it is. The more they stonewall, the worse off they’ll be.
a stone wall is bound to come crashing through thin ice.
Hopefully they are spending all their time preparing a bill for the Colesleezeball campaign.
Famous Republican lawyer Ginsberg of Florida 2000/Brooks Brothers riot fame should not be ignored. He should not get off just because he wasn’t doing the courtroom lawyering. His spin was a crucial element in the elongation of the case. His misinterpretations and downright lies made the Minnesota Coleman lawyers look even more incompetent and wasted the news waves. I believe in the law- every one deserves a lawyer and his days, weeks, months in court- but layers like Friedberg knew Coleman would have a lawyer: why on earth did he think he should “help a friend”? Both Coleman and Friedberg should think about the old adage “with friends like that who needs enemies.”
she does now…I just emailed her msnbc account.
FunnyD
If Pawlenty doesn’t sign off on the certification after either the Minnesota Supreme Court or the federal District court reject Coleman’s superfluous legal arguments, and this crap drags on for another three months or whatever, two things will be true:
1) Pawlenty will be committing political suicide in the state of Minnesota and on the national stage. He’d be handcuffing himself to the fortunes of Norm Coleman and they will both sink to the bottom of the political lake of doom.
Franken, his lawyers and many national Democrats will (justifiably) hammer away at Pawlenty for being obstructionists and sore losers, week in, week out, until the inevitable humiliation of defeat when Al Franken does take office. And make no mistake, Franken will eventually prevail in court, if need be.
2) The Republican Party in general would suffer a major, and very possibly fatal, blow in Minnesota.
Cooler heads on the Republican side will continue to peel off and distance themselves from the fight, splitting the party, damaging fund raising and the citizens of Minnesota will be totally fed up with any diehards who insist on dragging this out to the bitter end. The squandering of time, energy, money and party unity on a Quixotic joust with a windmill will provide endless amounts of Great News for John McCain.
Franken only did garner a few hundred more votes, but otherwise this election was essentially a tie. Now, by insisting on raising the stakes, the national Repubs could be turning that narrowest of losses into a much bigger and more devastating defeat.
Pass the popcorn!
In the Republican playbook, “steal” and “win” are interchangeable.