The three judges that make up the Election Contest Court sure move a lot slower than do the ones on the state Supreme Court.  The votes were counted two days ago, the counting is finished, and you’d think that it wouldn’t be that tough to simply say "Okay, Franken won, Norm can appeal, the ten-day clock for Norm to announce what we all know he’s going to do starts ticking NOW" and then bang the gavel.

So while we wait and wait and wait and wait, here are some amuse-gueules to keep you entertained and fed:

As I mentioned earlier, Pawlenty denied that he’s been contacted or pressured in any way by the national Republicans or anyone in DC.  But check out his somewhat flustered responses to Rachel Maddow’s questioning on the subject.  That sure doesn’t sound like a guy who’s not under any pressure now, does it? 

Billmon (h/t to Crooks and Liars) points out that if the Republicans were smart, they’d know better than to raise the Fourteenth Amendment "equal protection" argument, as Norm’s lawyers are doing:  "How, for example, is it ‘equal’ for poor and urban precincts to have 1/5th the number of voting machines per capita as wealthy surburban ones? Is it ‘equal’ for election officials to routinely deny elderly, undereducated or inexperienced voters the assistance they need to understand complex, confusing and/or poorly constructed ballots? Is it ‘equal’ for prosecutors to aggressively pursue registration fraud cases against ACORN, while generally ignoring those against GOP-leaning groups?"

– From the Twitter account of the Pioneer Press’ Rachel Stassen-Berger’s Political Animal blog (as nabbed earlier this afternoon over at the liveblog of The UpTake):  "Another datapoint: when #mncontest judges were considering counting ab. ballots they wanted to avoid passover. That may mean no order today." UpTake volunteer 51stWardPrecinctCaptain replied in the liveblog at 1:56:  "Why would anyone want to avoid Passover?   I find seders to be most enjoyable –and not a half-shabby pickup opportunity, to be perfectly candid".