In a Friday filing with California’s Fair Political Practices Commission, the Mormon Church listed almost $190,000 in previously unreported expenses in support of last year’s successful campaign to eliminate marriage equality in California.
The report, filed with the secretary of state’s office, listed a variety of California travel expenses for high-ranking members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and included $20,575 for use of facilities and equipment at the church’s Salt Lake City headquarters and a $96,849 charge for "compensated staff time" for church employees who worked on matters pertaining to Prop. 8.
It seems as if the complaint filed with the FPPC by Californians Against Hate was not as specious as the Mormons initially charged:
Up until Friday, the Mormon church had denied any direct financial support for the campaign beyond a reported $2,078 spent for bringing church Elder L. Whitney Clayton to California.
Church officials complained that Karger’s complaint was full of errors and that the church had "fully complied" with California law.
In other words, the Mormon Church had no intention of modifying their expense reporting until pressed by Californians Against Hate and the subsequent — and ongoing — FPPC investigation.
Roman Porter, the FPPC’s executive director, declined to discuss the case directly, saying only that it remained under investigation. In general, however, "cases like these hinge over what had to be reported and when it had to be reported," he said. A late report covering disputed filings "wouldn’t remove the obligation to file on time" but would be considered by investigators.
The proposed ban on same-sex marriage was called the second most-watched campaign in the nation last November, behind the presidential race. While Mormons gave millions of dollars to the "Yes on Prop. 8" campaign, church leaders insisted that the contributions came from individual church members, not the church itself, so the church was not required to file reports with California.
Here’s what the FPPC must find out: what else is the Mormon Church hiding? They have lied throughout this process about their huge and substantive contributions to the Proposition 8 campaign. They have disparaged those who asked them to tell the truth. They have scoffed at the state’s investigation into their expenditures.
What will make them tell the whole truth if not a far-reaching disgorgement-required investigation? It’s long past time to send a crack team of forensic accountants to Salt Lake City and demand complete access to the Church’s books.
It’s time for Californians to know the truth — how much money did the Mormon Church actually spend to overturn marriage equality?



22 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Dugg right here — please join me!
What’s the difference whether they spent $200,000 or $200,000,000?
It’s clear where the church stands in this matter and very clear that changing traditional marriage law frightens them and threatens their interests.
Well, it matters if they don’t declare it.
And it matters that they manage to keep their non-profit status.
The difference is that all contributions are required by law to be reported to the FPPC in California. The Mormon Church had initially only reported slightly more than two thousand dollars, and now they’ve increased their reporting to more than $190,000.
And this report, which supposedly covers the entire campaign, only shows airfare purchased in October, 25 Southwest tickets. So there’s lots more to report, and they are still lying.
Hell will freeze over before a large church loses non-profit status. At best, some mid-level officer might get a judicial scolding.
Yeah, Teddy, there’s plenty more. But what will finding accomplish? Do you have some next step in mind?
Sunlight. Disinfectant.
If it isn’t a problem, why has the church been lying and covering it up and fighting so hard to keep the secret?
What else are they trying to hide and obfuscate on this issue and others? How many laws are they breaking?
If you have familiarity with the history of LDS, you might be led to conclude that they don’t really think that the laws made by “gentiles” is of any great import.
Confirming a rather well-grounded suspicion doesn’t seem to lead anywhere that I can figure. Can someone can see a big benefit?
Marginalizing a bunch of liars and showing them to be the scam artists they are is a worthy piece of the exercise.
At this point, they exercise an outsize influence to their numbers. This might manage to knock them back down to reality. I’m sure it won’t change the thinking of the folks in power within the LDS but it will make their allies realize who they are dealing with.
The FPPC is known to hand out really big fines.
An investigation that showed that LDS was still lying would result in a hefty fine.
Continued publicity about the Church’s responsibility for Prop 8’s passage will discourage them from contributing so much again. If you know anything about the Mormon Church, it’s that they hate negative publicity. And it’s important that the truth about the theocratic out-of-staters be known.
Or are you among the “bygones” crew that wants us to “look forward?” Lotsa unprosecuted murderers, embezzlers and rapists are on your team.
I wish you were right, but fear that you badly underestimate the LDS,
Teddy, i suspect that the church raised millions that are not ever going to be found because the money was solicited from church members and the contributions listed as individual donations.
I’m not a real big fan of these guys.
The money contributed by members of the Church is different from the money contributed by the Church itself. People understand Church members contributing, even if hardly any Mormons live in California. But the idea that a Church itself would contribute to a political campaign sits wrong with people, and the idea that any Church would lie, and lie again, about its contributions — well, that’s what sunlight is for.
Sunlight won’t be enough. Stake through the heart and cut off the head or nothing. These are serious and determined people with a strong sense that they are guided by truth.
Metaphorically speaking, of course…
Cripes! “Sunlight” is metaphoric and I was playing with the image.
If people are advocating murder and decapitation on your blog, please let me know.
I’m offf the bus right around rudeness.
By the way, my dictionary defines LURKING as lying in concealment for an evil purpose.
Metaphor or have I fallen into bad company?
Now, now…
The house has an interest in even metaphoric or fantasy violent speech, such as you mentioned above. Do not read between the lines, please.
I play, but wish to be unambiguous about not advocating violence to fellow citizens or a method of living.
Dear Mod, tell me all is fogiven and lead me to any list of house rules.
No problem.
I might be a little hazy on how Mormons look at the Ten Commandments, but I believe one of them prohibits lying. So do they believe it’s okay to lie, as long as you lie to non-Mormons? Or is it just more wingnut attitude, that it’s okay to lie (or torture or murder, for that matter) if you’re doing it in a cause that directly benefits yourself, your church, or your political party?
It’s curious that none of the local Utah TV stations have mentioned this story, until today, and then only one, Fox13:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-o7-mWeJ-M
Not only is the LDS church not commenting at this point, it would seem that they’re encouraging the Utah media to avoid commenting as well. This story is a big deal for Mormons, as any story would be that might lead the rank-and-file to question the leadership’s competence.
Charges of hypocrisy and dishonesty don’t register with believers, but watching the leadership being held to account for incompetence (or worse) does.