And I thought yesterday’s events were crazy. The Coleman contest is so bizarre it’d be rejected as a Ben Stiller script.
As an UpTake commenter, Josh, said on the liveblog today: " [Comment From Josh] So recap: Day 1 is thrown out, pull out a couple of sympathetic witnesses, pull in a witness that says that his girlfriend forged a signature on the absentee ballot application, and we discover that one of the counties Coleman is using as a base for his argument is a Franken stronghold. Nice."
Or, as another (?) Josh, Mr. Marshall, said at Talking Points Memo:
Coleman witness and alleged ‘disenfranchised’ Coleman voter admits absentee fraud on the stand.
And this came out on direct examination.
Yes, boys and girls, this happened for real. Here’s the ‘disenfranchised’ Coleman voter:
One of the voters was Douglas Thompson, who admitted under oath that his girlfriend filled out his absentee ballot application for him, signing his name with her own hand and purporting to be himself. His ballot was rejected because the signature on his ballot envelope (his own) did not match the signature on the application (his girlfriend’s). The Coleman team’s argument appears to be that he is still a legal voter in Minnesota, as the signature on the ballot was his own, even if admitted dishonesty was involved in getting the ballot.
Keep in mind: Thompson’s story came up during the direct examination by Coleman lawyer James Langdon. So the Coleman camp fully knew this information and decided to make him into a witness.
How did this happen? As The UpTake’s Mike McIntee stated in his 5:15 pm update, the Coleman campaign is still shifting ballots in and out of the contest at will and at whim, trying to confuse the issue and the judges in a kind of three-card-ballot monte, or what the Franken camp’s Kevin Hamilton refers to as a "constant game of shuffling the deck". Except that judges get paid to see through this sort of crap, and the Coleman people either got too slick for their own good, or for some reason thought having a guy confessing to ballot fraud on the stand would be helpful to their case.
Remember, Norm Coleman has a hundred lawyers working for him, including guys shipped in by the national GOP. Most of the local talent, with the exception of local courtroom star Joe Friedberg, has been banished to the kiddie table while veterans of the Florida Coup are now running the show. And guess what? It’s even more messed up than it was when Fritz Knaak and Tony Trimble were in charge!
Stop the presses: Republican strategist, Mitt Romney flack, and utter tool among tools Alex Castellanos has written an opinon piece for CNN on the recount and Coleman’s contest, using Op-Edders (not journos) from the Murdoch Wall Street Journal to buttress his word-painting depicting a poor play-it-straight Norm Coleman, who never ever ever tried to pull a fast one during the recount, getting beat up by that evil lawyer-wielding, loophole-seeking Al Franken, who used the Minnesota Supreme Court’s ruling that campaigns were to be included in determining which of the wrongly-rejected "fifth-pile" absentee ballots to run roughshod over poor Normie-Wormie.
Ahem.
It was the Coleman team that used the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision to allow the campaigns a role in setting the fifth-pile ballot counting rules — a ruling that Franken fans like me bemoaned because we knew it was a gift to the Coleman team — to leave out ballots it didn’t like, and to change on a daily basis which ones it wanted and didn’t want included in the count. As noted above by Mike McIntee, the Coleman folks are still switching ballots in and out of the fray.
Oh, and it’s the crack Coleman team that Castellanos praises that presented, as evidence, futzed-with photocopies of properly rejected (i.e., not fifth pile) absentee ballots, photocopies that had both its marks and the county elections officials’ marks on them — and which the Coleman team had erased in its efforts to clean them up for the election contest, an act that the three-judge Election Contest Court did not particularly appreciate. In fact, they threw out that "evidence" and told Coleman’s people that they had to subpoena all the original ballots if they wanted to continue with their contest.
And it’s the Coleman team that presented, as a friendly, direct witness, a guy who copped to committing election fraud by having his girlfriend forge his signature on the ballot. And Coleman is apparently still "proud" of that witness.
But hey, that little piece of science fiction by Castellanos was certainly entertaining.



14 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
PW, had thought I would catch as much of this on the UpTake as I couldthis week, but I find myself so angry and frustrated by the tactics, I probably won’t be able to. And I can not help feeling they are very scrupulously choreographed by the big guys who just took over, to confuse, frustrate and obfuscate and although Mike MacIntee seems to feel the judges are not going to be fooled, I am not so sure. Are they going to have hundreds of like witnesses on for weeks and weeks, moving at a snail pace, delaying the seating of anyone in the Senate. Isn’t it obvious this is purposeful delaying? oye vay! as Al’s grandpa used to say.
So maybe reading your posts, informative and a tiny bit snarky but not too much, will have to get me through without a heart attack!
Nanz, I strongly suspect that the judges are going to let Norm have his way on various little things, so that when it comes time to deep-six his contest, his appeals won’t get very far. It’s a common strategy.
I just can’t get over the 100 lawyers. Who are obviously second-guessing and back-stabbing and bickering and running circles around each other and generally getting everything confused.
And the money! Good god. Lets see: 100 lawyers billing 8 hours a day at 200/hour average (okay I just made that up) makes $160,000 a day. For lawyers. I know you’ve talked about this, but where the hell is this money coming from?
And does Coleman even really want this any more, having taken another job, or is this totally driven by the GOP and their desire for the Dems not to have 60 senators?
Pardon the o/t but thought y’all would want to know…..
Goopers claim Holder assured them there would be no interrogation prosecutions.
http://washingtontimes.com/new…..osecution/
BTW AIG is paying out $450 million in bonuses to its Financial Products Unit which tanked the company selling derivatives. That’s on average more than a million apiece for each employee. US taxpayers have sunk some $150 billion in AIG to cover the bad decisions of these guys. Obscene is getting to be the default word to describe the government and industry’s approach to the meltdown.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpoi…..in_bon.php
Byzantine.
Sitting here shaking my head trying to follow that forking mess.
how long does this proceeding take and what can coleman do next?
they are clearly clogging the cogs for clogging purposes, how many more moves are tolerated?
Thanks PW.
digg
I would imagine that the respectable local lawyers don’t want anything more to do with the case. After all, they have to live with the judges when it’s all over. The last thing you want to be — at least in my jurisdiction — is on the bad side of a judge.
It looks as if Colemans legal team trying to single-handedly revive our ailing economy, at least for trial lawyers.
They do seem like a lot of guys, digging holes and then filling them again.
Hey, wait a minute, aren’t the GOP the same guys who want tort reform because trial lawyers make way too much money bringing baseless law suits?
OK, seriously, doesn’t the court at that point say “You tampered with evidence, you lose – election over, Franken wins”?
Why does the GOP have their A-Team on this? Is something non-obvious at stake?
Where the hell is the money comin’ from? Well there is some evidence that a good chunk of it might be coming from certain large corporations who don’t want the Employee Free Choice Act passed…folks like BankAmerica, Citibank, AIG, Home Depot, Walmart, etc. Coleman was one of their Golden Boys in stopping that Union-related effort. If Franken got in the filibuster might be broken.
I’m actually wondering if the Court will cite a number of criminal actions in their decision that places Coleman and his lawyers in legal jeopardy…falsification of documents to be used as evidence in court, an attempt to violate the state voting laws by introducing a fraudulent ballot filled in by other than the actual voter, etc.