Proving they have no political principles but their pocketbooks, several of California’s premier political consultants have banded together to extract more cash from the referendum process — and help export it to other states as well.
With no end in sight to the state’s flurry of ballot initiatives and the state likely to hold a special election this year, top Republican adviser Steve Schmidt and Democratic strategist Chris Lehane are among several California heavyweights forming a new firm solely designed to work on ballot-box campaigns.
Schmidt ran Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s re-election drive, while Lehane worked in the Clinton White House and defeated a GOP attempt to change California’s electoral college system.
The new firm, LFM Campaigns, also will include:
— Democratic consultant Ace Smith, who was Hillary Clinton’s California presidential campaign chairman and serves as an adviser to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a potential gubernatorial candidate
— Republican strategist Adam Mendelsohn, adviser to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the governor’s former communications director
— Mark Fabiani, Lehane’s longtime business partner and a former communications aide to President Clinton
As David writes at Calitics, "there’s a murderer’s row of willing stooges." As long as the money’s right!
Schmidt, you may recall, is responsible for the spectacular crash-and-burn of the most recent GOP presidential campaign, where he was unable to get across the finish line with a certified Vietnam war hero and a reform-minded female governor running against a biracial political rookie and a blarney-mouthed gaffemeister.
Lehane, of course, we last saw trying to bust the Writers Guild of America by taking the filthy lucre of the studio owners to break the union. Real Democratic Party values there, Chris.
But don’t worry — this stellar team means to keep their messes instate. Oh, wait:
While all are based in California, he said they consider the firm to be national in reach, especially as California’s brand of direct democracy spreads to other states.
Great! Bringing the structural breakdown of the initiative process to a ballot box near you, as long as there are Owners willing to pay to convince voters to pull a lever against their own interests.
{h/t David Dayen at Calitics}





11 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Dugg right here; please join me!
CA referendum process is busted. No self-respecting CA voter should vote yes on anything that involves raising public money.
It would be OK though to endorse stuff that Consumer Watchdog puts out. Cause they are usually regulatory in nature.
If anybody attempts to bring California-style initiative to New Mexico, I’ll have them clobbered.
California needs to fix its initiative process. A supermajority (say, 60% + 1) should be required for every citizen initiative. Fifty percent plus one is okay for referenda, but initiatives are so f***ed up that a hefty supermajority is the only way you can be sure the peepul won’t decide to make their arithmetic easier and vote to make pi = 3. Or they might decide that the Biblical thing to do is to make pi = 3 (somewhere in the temple specs there are circular planters referred to in a way that appears that the Jews of the era thought pi was 3).
The California constitution is a mess. You all need to have another ConCon, rewrite the damned thing, and fix the initiative.
As long as PAC contributions are tax deductible, this is going to continue to spiral completely out of control.
And after all, given the shitty economy, ballot issues are one of the few potential ‘growth sectors’ out there these days.
The ballot initiatives have relieved our representatives in Sac of any responsibility to do anything. They are all cowards and the initiatives keep them from having to make hard decisions. It is disgusting.
Mercitutes. A word I just made up.
Speaking as a CA native and resident for most of my voting life: You don’t want these modern astroturfed California initiative/referendum processes coming to your state.
I agree with BargainCountertenor, the process needs to be reformed. Not sure if a supermajority is the right fix, but that should surely be considered. Raising the proportion of registered voting population that needs to sign to qualify for the ballot might be another. In view of proposition 8, clarifying what can and cannot be done with one via ref/initiative is another thing that needs to be done (By my general principles, I think proposition 8 should be unconstitutional, but not sure about the technical legalities)
I am not sure how or whether it can be done, but banning big money corporate and consulting frim paid and prostituted signature campaigns for ballot qualification would be another good idea.
What happens in CA now with these things is not at all what Hiram Johnson had in mind.
Dugg.
Lets see…. there are several groups who push specific ballot measure, tax limitation, gay marriage, eminent domain…
CA Prop 13 –> Oregon Prop 5
Oregon prop on eminent domain –> AZ eminent domain prop
CA Prop 8 —> AZ prop 102 and several more states…..
Colorado TABOR –> AZ Tabor ballot measure….
Oregon prop to raise any taxes requires a super majority —> AZ 2/3 majority vote to raise taxes…..
It goes on and on …..
Dugg.
late late nite up at the mothership