As mentioned yesterday, Norm Coleman — despite the near-certainty that he is going to have his ass handed back to him as very-expensively-prepared legal sashimi — has done the will of his Republican masters and filed a contest of the recount, something he had said way back on November 5 that he would not do were he behind in the count. (How bogus is the contest? Here’s one of the stronger arguments from it. Yeah, it’s that pathetic.)
Now that the contest has been made, expect to see Norm’s media surrogates escalate their already intense effort to smear and attack anyone associated with the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Secretary of State’s office, or the pool of judges from which Minnesota Supreme Court justice Alan Page — who is handling this matter as the court’s chief justice, Pawlenty appointee Eric Magnuson, has recused himself as he was part of the State Canvassing Board — will pick the three-judge panel that will adjudicate Coleman’s contest.
We’ve already had the attacks on Mark Ritchie and the State Canvassing Board, implying that he, as an Evil Partisan Democrat, stacked the SCB with like-minded Evil Partisan Democrats. Jeff Fecke, his Snark-O-Matic set on "fricassee". blasts that particular bogosity down rather effectively:
Yes, Mark Ritchie has been a schemer! And he’s completely outschemed the canvassing board, which is made up of poor, pathetic creatures like:
- Minnesota Chief Justice Eric Magnusuon, an appointee and former law partner of Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Magnuson has drawn praise from pro-life groups and is known as a “lawyer’s lawyer.”
- Minnesota Associate Justice G. Barry Anderson, an appointee of Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who is known in the state as a conservative stalwart.
- Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, first elected in a non-partisan election in 1986, Gearin has been re-elected three times; she was promoted to Chief Judge in 2008 after serving as Associate Chief Judge for four years.
- Judge Edward J. Cleary, a Ramsey County judge appointed by Independence Party Gov. Jesse Ventura in 2002, he received the Graven Public Service Award from the Minnesota State Bar Association in 1998.
So, clearly, we have a bunch of weak-willed simpletons who are all willing to cave to an evil Secretary of State. It’s just too bad that Ritchie couldn’t have chosen someone who’d accomplished something in their lives, and of course, the fact that he appointed two Republicans, one Independent, and one Democrat to serve with him proves that he was out to fix things so only Franken could win.
Got that? The State Canvassing Board was if anything more conservatively than liberally tilted, yet they still refused to let Norm Coleman and his Hordes of Lawyers© run roughshod over them, hence the whines emanating from Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal‘s editorial page.
If they can get away with implying that the conservatively-tilted State Canvassing Board as liberally-biased — and the conservatives running the once-proud St. Paul Pioneer Press seem to be happy to help them do so — then they can set up their next move, which is to pressure Alan Page into picking nothing but Republican trogdolytes or easily-rolled Dem or Indie judges for the three-judge contest panel. Luckily, Justice Page doesn’t seem to be as pliable as the Cons would like: He dissented from the Minnesota Supreme Court’s sole blunder in the recount, which was to force the county elections personnel to allow the campaigns to have a say in the counting of "fifth-pile" (wrongly rejected) absentee ballots — a move that gave Norm’s campaign the power to attempt to sabotage the counting of fifth-pile ballots. In addition, while Norm may have the Murdoch Journal and the PiPress for his Amen Corners, the rule of law has us — and while they likely will have weight with the rest of the TradMed, we probably have more readers than they do.



30 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
When have the wingnuts ever let facts interfere with their arguments? You must be one of those “reality-based” fanatics!!!
I swear, Coleman’s looking more and more like Doug Neidermeyer:
“How does it feel to be an independent,
SchoensteinFranken?”“How does it feel to be an asshole,
NeidermeyerColeman?”He thinks he’s Otter, but he’s really Neidermeyer.
Nah, I think he both looks and acts more like Marmalard than Niedermeyer.
As always, YMMV
Heh, reasonable people can disagree without being disagreeable but we can all agree that Coleman’s a prick. And a loser.
Even Powerline has repudiated the recent WSJ smear. They’re making some other allegations, but they have to live in Minnesota and can’t be as creepy as the national Republicans can.
Alan Page is a classy, dignified guy and doesn’t like to be thought of as an ex-football player, but I’d still love to see him pick up a Coleman lawyer and throw him through a window.
Maureen Dowd has just weighed in on the Caroline Kennedy controversy. She thinks the Senate would be lucky to get her. That has got to be the kiss of death if ever there was one.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01…..wd.html?em
Coleman is running for the title of Americas Sorest Loser but has stiff competition from Marilyn Musgrave.
303 hrs & 35 min
Governor Mark Ritchie.
Has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it?
This is all useless noise..Fraken will take the seat !!
Of course Franken will take the seat. That’s not the point for the Rs now. Now, the point is to f*ck with the Dem majority and Obama for as long and as much as they can.
I watched the proceedings of the Board when the Minn Star Tribune had it running live on their site for a couple of hours. I have to tell you, I have never seen a more fair and honest process.
Coleman and the Repugs are going to have one hell of a hard time convincing anyone otherwise IMO.
God bless the Minnesotans.
Pat Fitzgerald Boots One
U.S. Attorney accidentally releases names of sources in fraud case
JANUARY 7–In a remarkable screw-up, a Department of Justice official today accidentally distributed to the media a document containing the names of nearly 20 confidential witnesses interviewed during a federal probe targeting the operators of a fraudulent investment scheme.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/a…..oops1.html
Pardon the o/t but y’all will get a kick outta this one:
“Homeland Security rules on data collection riles businesses”
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/n…..rity_N.htm
Welcome to the world of Big Brother, all you @ sshole bush supporters! First they came for the librarians; now they’re coming for you (and it couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of hypocrites).
Can the three-judge-contest panel order another recount? Will the panel question the validity and be able to throw out any ballot groups? Does the panel have the authority to overturn Franken’s win? Will the case eventually move to the Republican-Biased US Supreme Court?
Like perris always says, there are no secrets. Someone with the right connections can discover and intercept trade secrets, unconsummated business transactions, stock market trades, and personal information.
Now some business types are squawking about it? How silly. This has been going on for four years or more.
I’d like him to appoint the three judge panel of Jim Marshall, Gary Larsen and Carl Eller.
He’s the frakking Tom Friedman of politics.
Is this Alan Page the Alan Page of the Purple People Eaters?
Yes.
The big question is whether Coleman will be indicted for bribery before the election court case is settled. Would make for interesting issues with respect to standing.
“Can the three-judge-contest panel order another recount? Will the panel question the validity and be able to throw out any ballot groups? Does the panel have the authority to overturn Franken’s win? Will the case eventually move to the Republican-Biased US Supreme Court?”
You have to begin with the Statute Law — in this contest, the party bringing the suit has the burden of proof. What the court will and can order would depend on whether Coleman comes in with proof of his claims sufficent to cause the court to issue an order. The court could, for instance, require bond for any expenses, and by law the loser pays all court costs.
Ironically, the whole Minnesota Recount system and statute law is based on the foundation of the decisions in the MN Governor’s recount case in 1962-63, Anderson V. Rolvaag. That decision is actually addressed in Bush v. Gore to the argument that State Election Law prevails in State Elections. The court in 2000 had to argue around Anderson v. Rolvaag on the grounds that the Constitution set a deadline for Flordia’s vote count — the date of the Electorial College meeting. That exception would not apply to Minnesota, as we have no deadlines other than requirements as to when trials have to begin in a Contest. So in essence Bush v. Gore actually recognized Anderson v. Rolvaag as the lead precident, the settled law. So no, I don’t predict it will successfully get into Federal Court. In 63 the case went through the Federal Courts — the decision Anderson v. Rolvaag was written by the 8th Circuit Appeals Court, and affirmed by the Warren Supreme Court. So given this — I don’t think the Feds will even look at the case.
“I’d like him to appoint the three judge panel of Jim Marshall, Gary Larsen and Carl Eller.”
Sadly, Carl Eller is currently under going trial in Hennepin County Court for assaulting a policeman who apparently tried to stop him for drunk driving. Sad.
I’d vote for him.
Yeah, Carl’s had a rough post-football life. So has Jim Marshall, though not quite as bad as Carl’s.
Thanks for this, Sara! This is good to know.
i recall former senator Coleman saying on video about a week or so ago that he didn’t really care about the outcome of the votes because he was above petty posturing.
it might be a good time to find that video and start recycling it to remind everyone what kind of an ass he really is.
teh funny! LOL
I agree. A gentle reminder every time he says something contrary to it could help him remember and help people understand.