Choosing not to back her California colleague’s Panetta pique, Senator Barbara Boxer told the SF Chronicle that President-Elect Obama "took the right approach" in choosing an outsider to run the CIA.
"He’s a wonderful leader, manager, reformer … with a lot of skills," Boxer said. "And I guess there’re two things you could look for – an outsider like Leon who could come in and reform the agency and build up the trust … and make it more amenable to working with the other agencies. The other is to just take an expert in intelligence and put them in charge – and that’s more a hands-on person, an ‘into the weeds’ person."
Obama, she said, "took the right approach … you pick someone like Leon," with insider experts like Blair working alongside him and others with experience assisting him.
As the current and continuing chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, Boxer also made the point that nobody called her ahead of time about Obama’s choice to head the Environmental Protection Agency:
Boxer acknowledged that for any president, "it’s good to work with the chairman" of key committees on important appointments – though she noted Obama "didn’t confer with me on the (Environmental Protection Agency) appointment. I talked to him about it, and I would have loved to have known."
"I think the more communication with the Senate, the better … (it’s) a better way to go," she said. "We’re all going to be on his team."
Boxer predicted the controversy will soon be over – she said she’s confident Panetta will be confirmed.
Then, she said, the whole issue will be merely "water under the bridge."
Does that seem to anyone else like a quite pointedly delivered, "Get over it" from Barbara to Dianne in her own hometown paper?





31 Comments
Spotlight



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Digg is open
My, my.
I guess DiFi’s discovering all kinds of things about not being the Republican president’s Democratic rubber stamp, isn’t she.
I think it also shows just how much in Darth Cheney’s pocket Jello Jay was, as SSCI chair. DiFi expected that same kind of deference and hem-kissing, and Barbara made it clear to her that nobody gets that from the Obama team. They have a different sense of the checks-and-balances, as any rational player would.
Thanks for this, Teddy!
Thanks Teddy. I wonder how the CIA will feel about not having a Company man in charge…
And how will the enabling Senators and Congresscritters feel?
Barbara Boxer, a mature adult in the US Senate? How weird is that?
I was of the impression that DiFi has said she will back Panetta. I think not consulting her was more of a lapse on Obama’s part than an intentional snub.
More Boxer news.
Tennesseeans Bring Jar Of Sludge To Sen. Boxer Ahead Of Hearing
Wonder if the “Get over it” was harder to take from one so spunky and looking so great. ;)
I get the sense that Obama intentionally snubbed DiFi to let her know there’s a new boss, and when she whined about it publicly the press got the “apology” story all wrong. She came around really fast on supporting Panetta after Obama “apologized”. Makes me suspect some serious arm-twisting, of which this Boxer interview is likely part.
People might think Obama is naive, considering the problems Clinton had when he came into office and what a nitwit Bush is, but I’m seeing signs that Obama’s learned a few things operating as one of those dreadful community organizers. Certainly he’s used to dealing with fragile egos and little caesars with their tiny empires.
OT Daschle’s confirmation hearing essentially a bipartisan love fest
284 hrs & 4 min
i’m no fan of difi (shocking i know), but at this moment in our history, i’m not keen on more power being concentrated in the executive branch.
democracy now had a two parter on blair (obama’s choice for dni), who we’ve kinda overlooked in our focus on panetta: Obama Nominee Admiral Dennis Blair Aided Perpetrators of 1999 Church Killings in East Timor – part 1, part 2
You mean there’s at least one Senator who didn’t stamp her feet and hold her breath because she wasn’t told in advance what the President (and let’s face, O is the President after 8 years of actually NOT having one even if it’s not the 20th yet) was going to do. A grown-up among the WATBs. Nice.
“Water under the bridge” seems a deft way to dismiss one’s colleague’s pique about not having been consulted, especially given the example provided about EPA head.
Boxer has her own issues with backstabbing progressives. No clean hands on Boxer. Yearly Kos.
“No clean hands on Boxer.”
Yeah, well, if the Senate were on fire and I had to choose which of the California delegation I was going to pick up and carry to safety, I wouldn’t have to think long before choosing Boxer. And, it’s not because she’s lighter and easier to carry.
Spot On, Barbara.
Me too.
Reid said that he would stay as the leader until 2015 !
We need to put lots of pressure where it will do the most good.
*spit*
Democracy Now is the best “News” program out there; to bad so few watch it.
As is typical, the US and the Senate could care less killings in East Timor. Bill Clinton did nothing to stop Indonesian rampage in ‘99.
One Clintonista supposedly said the U.S. didn’t have a horse in the East Timor race. After the slaughter started getting some coverage in the Australian press, Clinton issued a mild public statement of disapproval and Indonesia backed off.
I’ve been thinking of that a lot in light of Obama’s reluctance to say anything on behalf of the civilian casualties in Gaza.
Well, I’m just SOOOO confused. Harry Reid is barring the door on Joe Biden once he becomes Veep so the executive branch can’t exercise influence on the Senate. The Senate want to maintain itself as half of an independent branch of government but now it also wants the executive to run everything by it first???
The Senate is supposed to give “advice & consent” IN THE SUNSHINE, Princess Dianne, not rule on nominations or even get royal heads-ups behind closed doors.
The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com
Dianne Feinstein is 75, stupid and all about ego.
Just an average Senator, then.
well, we’ll just have to keep talking it up to convince more people to give it a listen (or a read, or a watch). *g*
Pretty much. See Harry Reid and John McCain for further examples.
Bush, Cheney and their enablers counted on history to cover expediency.
History is not cooperating.
Not every participant will receive their just deserts, but no one will walk away covered with glory, and some, such as Feinstein and Rockefeller may rightly fear that their legacy will be their most shamefull moments rather than their proudest.
Don’t forget Lieberman.
Excellent! Breaking up the cycle of good-ol’-boy spooks at Langley, is God’s work. The CIA (Motto: “Proudly Overthrowing Fidel Castro for five decades!” h/t to Dave Barry. :o) ) needs someone to break up the right-wing koolaid factory and return it to it’s original purpose of gathering intelligence about external threats to us.
You GO, Leon!!! :o)