Who’s more likely to use condoms or other forms of birth control when they eventually have premarital sex — young people who’ve pledged to remain virgins until marriage or those who haven’t? And who is more likely to have premarital sex — youth who’ve made an abstinence pledge or those who haven’t?
Teenagers who pledge to remain virgins until marriage are just as likely to have premarital sex as those who do not promise abstinence and are significantly less likely to use condoms and other forms of birth control when they do, according to a study released today.
The new analysis of data from a large federal survey found that more than half of youths became sexually active before marriage regardless of whether they had taken a "virginity pledge," but that the percentage who took precautions against pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases was 10 points lower for pledgers than for non-pledgers.
Your federal tax dollars are being spent on abstinence programs; the central feature for many is an abstinence pledge. Now that a new science-based, reality-oriented, fact-driven Administration is about to take office, can we devote that money elsewhere, please?
The findings are reigniting the debate about the effectiveness of abstinence-focused sexual education just as Congress and the new Obama administration are about to reconsider the more than $176 million in annual funding for such programs.
"This study again raises the issue of why the federal government is continuing to invest in abstinence-only programs," said Sarah Brown of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. "What have we gained if we only encourage young people to delay sex until they are older, but then when they do become sexually active — and most do well before marriage — they don’t protect themselves or their partners?"
James Wagoner of the advocacy group Advocates for Youth agreed: "The Democratic Congress needs to get its head out of the sand and get real about sex education in America."
Of course, in a reality-based world, these findings wouldn’t reignite debate — they would end the debate.
And since teens in abstinence programs get misinformation about condoms, they are less likely to use them when they do become sexually active.
…24 percent of those who had taken a pledge said they always used a condom, compared with about 34 percent of those who had not.
Rosenbaum attributed the difference to what youths learn about condoms in abstinence-focused programs.
"There’s been a lot of work that has found that teenagers who take part in abstinence-only education have more negative views about condoms," she said. "They tend not to give accurate information about condoms and birth control."
The Flat Earth Lobby, whose ox is rather gored by this huge authoritative study, has some choice projection with regard to its findings:
"It is remarkable that an author who employs rigorous research methodology would then compromise those standards by making wild, ideologically tainted and inaccurate analysis regarding the content of abstinence education programs," said Valerie Huber of the National Abstinence Education Association.
[snip]
"Abstinence education programs provide accurate information on the level of protection offered through the typical use of condoms and contraception," she said. "Students understand that while condoms may reduce the risk of infection and/or pregnancy, they do not remove the risk."
Nancy Pelosi’s New Direction Congress needs to get in step with the science-based Obama Administration and end funding for these programs. They provide youth with misinformation, have no impact on sexual mores, and endanger the sexually active. It’s time to end this dangerous experiment on American teens: abstinence education, including its creepy pledge ritualistic behavior, does not work.
We’re failing American youth on so many fronts: borrowing from them to pay off crooks and bandits, sending them to poorly purposed wars, allowing their schools to decay and crumble, taking higher education out of reach of many.
Can we at least stop lying to them about sex?
UPDATE: Pam sez "Duh"





79 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Digg ‘em if ya got ‘em
This Administration has never let facts interfere with their agenda.
Hold on there, mister, that doesn’t look like Angelina.
;-)
just a coupla sexy pix for a sexy story! *g*
I like Betty’s shoes
I’m “kinda fonda wanda…”
Ah, Betty. Heartthrob of my youth. Between Betty and BB I was a mess.
These stupid programs aren’t deserving of federal dollars. Congress shouldn’t re-ignite debate; Congress should end the debate and end the funding.
Abstinence education is simply worthless.
Speaking of which, Teddy – drumroll, please:
//……………………………..// (that’s my drumroll)
Levi and Bristol just had their baby. They’ve named him Tripp.
Here are some definitions of Tripp (from the Urban Dictionary):
#5 -
To engage in sexual intercourse with, usually while drunk or out of pure infatuation. Another word for having sex.
She got drunk and tripped with him after the party.
#3 – When you are extremly stoned on erb u tripp!!!
yo man, im trippen of dat shit
#4 -
A noob of extraordinary proportions
Tripp Easton Mitchell Johnston.
Tripping is a hockey penalty.
Easton is a hockey equipment manufacturer, as is Mitchell.
Sensing a theme here…
What’s abstinence?
Did they ever get hitched?
Thanks Ed for the laugh, is the child 1 or 2? Yep there no need for Sex Ed about safe sex. The just say No has failed once again, I’m shocked it didn’t work.
jo6pac
I don’t think they’re that sophisticated, Teddy…
So the family tradition continues.
My Abstinence Pledge remains intact. Plus, the Pledge gives it a lasting shine and a lemony scent.
I am so not goin’ anywhere with that. *g*
I thought it was an absinthe pledge. I was all for it. Oops.
Sometime in 2009 is the current, uh, “plan…”
Curious, getting pregnant took no planning at all but a wedding takes all kinds of it.
It also repels dust, so I got that goin’ for me.
No, I figure they just looked in the mudroom at home and came up with some names.
I’ve known Tripps before, but they are always three-sticks kids, sons of Juniors.
Any word on Granny’s Oxy case?
Krugman on Rachel soon!
We’ll see.
ROFLMFAO
How about Linda Tripp of the blue dress fame? Now there’s a role model for ya.
This is another example of the stupidity of our media. This is simply the latest in a very long line of studies going back almost to the beginnings of the abstinence only movement evaluating these programs. Virtually every one of these has shown exactly the same thing: these programs do nothing to reduce or even delay sexual activity in teens, but they do increase teen pregnancies and the spread of STDs because the kids in these programs do not use birth control. We have known for years that abstinence only is a colossal failure and waste of money, but the media only briefly reports on the studies (and buries the stories) and then ignores them.
I don’t expect any new information until the 5th or 6th.
Today’s Ms ET and my 29th Wedding Anniversary. Usually, we go to a romantic movie and a fine dinner, but all the fine restaurants in Anchorage are closed, and ETette goes back to Seattle tomorrow, and ET Jr’s former GF heads back to U of Vermont tomorrow too, so we’re home for the day.
Congratulations. What are ya doin’ here? *g*
I was impressed by this study’s attempt to control for so many variables, though — religious background, educational level, geographic region, race. Many times, the opponents of sex ed have been able to get an “Earth’s Shape? Opinions Differ” headline by criticizing previous studies’ lack of control for these factors.
I agree with you that we’ve always known abstinence education sucks ass; but this study seems designed to counter many of the “objections” to previous studies. Thus, I imagine, the vitriol from Valerie Huber.
Congratulations to the Tellers! What’s your secret?
Good question. Waiting for the lasagne noodles to get here from the store. I’m making King crab lasagne. It’s only 5:40 here.
I knew a girl in college who never used birth control because planning for sex made you a sluuuuuuuut! She’d had three abortions — all done in secret and paid for by mommy and daddy — before she left college.
Frankly, I think being a “slut” is much more moral. Not to mention honest.
Norwegian, Icelandic and Swedish blood. When we get frustrated with each other, we just ignore each other until it is over.
Can we have dinner at your house? I’ll bring some leftover cheesecake!
Very well. Carry on.
guys can be sluts too.
The objections were never valid, but you are correct that this is the most rigorous and controlled study of the effects.
Wonder what kind of a head case she is now.
Heh! That sounds familiar, says the Swedish-German woman married to a Norwegian.
Certainly healthier.
Maybe the abstinence pledges fail because the kids keep putting the rings on their fingers instead of a more pertinent appendage. Of course, the lack of circulation would eventually cause it to turn black and fall off, at which time they would be the lucky recipient of an official abstinence pledge “Mission Accomplished” banner.
She’s probably either a good little Iowa housewife safely married to the son of the local banker for a quarter-century and expecting her first grandchild, or she ran off to San Francisco to be a performance artist. My money’s on the former — she was far too hidebound to break free.
Obama’s willingness to associate himself with a God-bothering dirtbag like Rick Warren does not speak well for his willingness to ditch this abstinence-only snake oil.
Televangelist and megachurches: the only trends in American culture more disheartening than A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila.
We do a lot of scenes that never make it to Prairie Home Companion, because ours – unlike the PHC scenes – happen in real time. very. very. very. slowly…
Preview is my friend…
The author seemed ready for the kinds of objections that have enabled Abstinence Inc to get a toehold against previous studies, too. All in all, I was very impressed with the presentation.
Federal funding for this in the face of continued evidence of failure is malpractice. We are hurting America’s young people with this nonsense — and we export it too!
Teddy luvs some Digg luv
They must have overlooked those darlin girls who pledged chastity to their daddys and wear purity rings to prove it..
Malpractice pretty much defines the Bush (mal)administration.
The couple ain’t married yet, but they’s plannin’ on it in 2009. Its a sin what they done. But that kinda judgment is reserved for Sarah Palin and other Christian Republicans to inflict on the rest of us. Not themselves.
How easily they preach abstinence and the condemnation of birth control. Will People magazine point out the hypocrisy? No, because this is a blessed event. Can’t bother to point out the hypocrisy of the Palin’s, even as they are touted as the next Christian Republican Dynasty.
In my high school, class of 61, the rage was “cherry pins.” It was like an party girl’s advertisement.
sex is something you can not pledge away as if i’s a choice, it’s one of the most powerful drives we have, it’s the drive to reproduce.
pledging away sex is like pledging away drinking water, you’re goonna get your water one way or another.
by the way, if a person with a normal sex drive does indeed intend on honoring their pledge they will therefore marry the first person they want to have sex with whether or not that marriage will last.
people forget men and women married much younger a generation ago, it’s alot easier to stay celebate if you’re getting married as a teenager then if you’re getting married into your twenties, a generation ago you were an old maid if not married by the time you were twenty, now if you get married before twenty you married far too young
it’s all perspective but the physical evolution of our bodies is still the same, adolsence we were designed to desire sex, ain’t nothing you can do about that
all we can do is educate, education is inoculaion
THANK GOODNESS
Actually, the onset of sexual maturity is much earlier in life now for boys and girls, due to nutritional improvements and (some say) cultural influences. So while the pressure to wait to marry grows, the hormonal pressure to engage in sex happens at a younger and younger age.
Abstinence has never worked, even when there are widespread, pervasive social pressures against extramarital sex. It did not work when I was growing up in Oklahoma in the 1950s and 1960s. According to the most comprehensive survey on the subject, it did not work in my parents’ generation nor in my grandparents’. Indeed, if my great grandmother’s (probable) illegitimate and her sister’s definite illegitimate son are any measure, it did not work then either. According to the study, the rate of premarital sex has not significantly changed since about 1900 (we don’t have quantitative data for earlier periods).
Gonna get some reading in before my eyes mutiny for the evening.
Be good to yourselves, and all other living things.
Israel, are ya listening?
Namaste
And as the good small town Iowa house wife she is probably a leader of the moralizing Baptists crusading against “smut and pR0n and the breakdown of society caused by all them permissive libruls”
here’s a simple fact;
for every women being a slut there is a guy being a slut
for every guy being a slut there is a women being a slut
men are NOT more promiscuous then women nor have they ever been, it’s simply perception
here’s another simple observation;
when a man wants sex it’s not likely he can just go out and pick someone up
when a women wants sex it is likely she can just go out and pick someone up
and women are usually attracted to the same guys
therefore more women are having sex then men since most women are having sex with the same man
I reached sexual maturity at the time my religion said I was supposed to reach it, 13, there were some in my class who reached it a couple of years early, some later
I don’t suspect that has changed much at all
The fucking of young people has always been an important issue for old people who are not fucking or who are not enjoying the fucking they are having…
Young people will fuck no matter what old farts say and do. All the political heat doesn’t matter to them at all…
Why should they give a fuck what old fucks think?
great post, especially this;
the people against pre-marital sex are married
go
figure
There is a certain age- about 16- at which a guy thinks about nothing but sex- any temporary moment of sanity is displace within milliseconds to the preferred subject.
I have no idea how it is with 16 year old girls-
Ah, 1961! The advent of “the pill”. Venereal disease was “a thing of the past” and HIV was decades away.
By 1962, every physician in the country was prescribing the pill to young women as a magical zits cure.
Excellent.
Started at about 14 for me.
Actually sort of works, since zits are caused by testosterone.
Against a hard young dick- all the preaching, religion, parenting, and political bastardry in the world is as nothing.
Can’t ever remember wanting or needing any “Sex Education” what the fuck was the point of THAT?
Guys learn at a pretty early age where to put their dicks and what you can wrap em with if you are so inclined. The rest of “sex education” might as well have come from Sunday School.
The only sex education a fifteen year old kid want is how to get laid.
By the way, Bristol Stomp Palin gave birth today- her sex education class worked.
The difference between the religious right and everyone else is that the religious right speaks out against fucking before they do it- everyone else skips that step and just gets down to the fuckin.
(((((Teddy)))))
Eli is upstairs at the Mothership!
Wankers of the Month
I’m dating myself, but that incredibly hot pic is too old for me to immediately recognize.
Betty Grable, is it?
I believe the appropriate phrase is va-va-va-VOOM!
Betty Page, and that’s quite a remarkably mundane photo for her.
Seems to me that gays (men or women) very rarely have unwanted pregnancies. No wonder the holy rollers hate them. Straights who either get pregnant, or father the child of an unmarried woman, are much easier to make an example out of. (Unless, of course, they are the children of Sarah Palin, or other high-profile holy rollers — then we shouldn’t make a point of it.)
It is astounding how too many Americans are able to ignore this fact.