Comments on: California Supreme Court Takes Up Prop 8

By: tw3k

tw3k — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:36:48 +0000

bah,
s/gad/god
edit would be welcome or as a sage once said; ‘preview is my friend.’

By: tw3k

tw3k — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:34:16 +0000

/me needs to del a h8 from first graph.

By: tw3k

tw3k — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:33:32 +0000

You know, really, I’ve always been baffled about the h8 for Mormon polly h8.

If I loved both a man and a woman why would that be frown upon?

I mean,after all, isn’t it a sort of ‘free market solution?’ I enter into a union that maximizes on productivity, what’s to lose?

If a bond between a man and a woman is productive and happy. That sees gad, right?

If two men and a woman are productive together and find a universal bond, we should praise them right?

Why is marriage regulated?!

lol

By: Lagunatic

Lagunatic — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:32:09 +0000

This is not new. The challenge by Lambda Legal and the ACLU was brought prior to the election and the Court decided to wait until after the election because they might not have had to act.

By: DWBartoo

DWBartoo — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:32:24 +0000

Thanks, Teddy;

I’ve been waiting to hear when this would happen.

The questions the Court poses are ‘interesting’.

One hesitates to say that anything is being (to use an old term) ‘telegraphed’, yet, the ‘nature’ of the questions suggests that the Court has already invested some careful ‘consideration’ and, clearly expected to be involved, in a very thoughtful manner, in this critically important aspect of Civil Rights.

I do not get the sense that the Court is pleased with what occurred on November 4th OR the ‘run-up’ to that vote.

I expect the Court to uphold the Civil Rights of all, Teddy.

By: Teddy Partridge

Teddy Partridge — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:37:54 +0000

Dugg right here, join me if you like.