Someone here, who knows us, who professes to love us, made the decision to take away our civil rights. But I love the staff, I love coming here. And I don’t know what can fix this.But it needs to be fixed.
Timothy Kinkaid of Box Turtle Bulletin joked about the conflict:
What do you want? And instead of saying something like "civil rights," I keep thinking "Number two, soft chicken taco with cheese enchilada."
But the anger was apparent as the few customers of the evening walked in, including a lesbian couple. They were met with angry chanting of "Shame on you, shame on you, shame on you!"
At issue: a $100 dollar donation to the Mormon Church to Yes on 8 given by Marjorie Christoffersen, the daughter of the owner. Marjorie herself is not an owner, as has been often erroneously reported; she like other managers draws only a salary from working at the restaurant. Her mother, the sister of El Coyote’s founder, is not Mormon, according to longtime restaurant staff. Christoffersen had listed El Coyote as her place of employment on her donation form, per campaign disclosure requirements. ![]()
Last night manager Billy Shoeppner distributed copies of a letter from Equality California thanking El Coyote for their $500 donation to continue the fight to restore marriage rights. The contribution came from the restaurant’s workers, many of whom are gay. El Coyote will be giving another larger donation to the Lambda Legal Fund.
But protesters, the majority of whom were El Coyote patrons until Christoffersen’s donation to Yes on 8 became public, were not swayed and vowed to protest tonight, Saturday and every Thursday until there is a resolution, something some activists are calling for:
There has to be a healing, a reconciliation. We love the restaurant, we love it here. But not with Marjorie behaving this way, not with knowing our money goes to take away our civil rights.
The restaurant, normally crowded, had fewer than 50 patrons–including a busload of French tourists. One protester slipped $100 to the wait staff to make up for lost tips, stating:
It’s not their fault, I know this is hurting them, but we have to take a stand.
Shoeppner frequently stepped outside the almost deserted landmark restaurant, saying that he understood why the demonstrators were there, and exchanged hugs with his protesting customers, several of whom were crying. In the background the crowd chanted:
Hey, hey, ho, ho, Marjorie has got to go!
Many feel that if Christoffersen does not return to the restaurant, they will be able to patronize it again, while others said that El Coyote is ruined for them forever:
It’s like Coors beer–they came out against us gays, and now even decades later, no gay bar will serve Coors beer.
Recalled a former patron turned protester:
When one of the guys died from AIDS, Marjorie paid for his mother to fly out for his funeral. She is not a bad woman, she just listened to her church and couldn’t see, didn’t undertand. There’s a disconnect. But our money went towards taking away our rights.
One longtime customer commented that he had been coming to El Coyote for over forty years, and the same waitress who carried him as a baby is still working there:
It would be a tragedy to loose this place, to see it close, be torn down, become a strip mall. Tori Spelling comes here without body guards, Madonna eats here because she can and no one cares. It’s a family. I believe that Marjorie has seen the effect of her donation, and will stand up to her church and say what happened, what they did was wrong. I hope she does that. If one woman can make a difference, she can. She’s seeing how her church hurt her friends, people she loves that she calls her family, people who have known her since they were children, people who have worked here for decades and have been coming here for decades. I think, I hope she will speak up and speak out and fix this.





18 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Thanks, Lisa. Great job.
Great post. Sad story. This one along with your previous post about the civil protests makes me smile to see people acting like humans.
I hope Marjorie speaks out soon too.
Thanks Lisa.
I just don’t see this happening. Ms Christoffersen had the opportunity to discuss this with her church when the order came down. She could have even said, “No, I think I’ll donate to a children’s hospital instead.” After the fact, she could have said to her customers, “I made this donation because my church told me to, and I did it without really thinking about what it meant. I now realize how devastating this was to the gay and lesbian families who eat here, and I see how wrong I was. I’m sorry for what I’ve done, and I certainly won’t help fund any measures like this in the future.” She could also say, “I’ve talked to my church leaders about this, and I’ve told them that I really don’t think the church should be funding the drive to take away my customers’ civil rights.”
As far as I can tell, she’s done none of these things. Her church told her what to do, and she did it. She doesn’t seem to have questioned the order in any way. She even put herself through the community-meeting-from-hell, and she STILL doesn’t seem to question it. Why would she change now?
Here is a link to the California Secretary of State website showing that Marjorie Christoffersen is the agent for service of process for El Coyote:
http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpd…..r=C0537943
So Christoffersen is obviously more than “just an employee” of El Coyote.
were any arrests made?
heck, my thursdays are free. think i’ll go next wk.
You’re in/near LA?
We are neighbors.
Frank, I don’t see her doing it either. Mormons are taught not to question, not to argue with their church leaders.
I was pretty angry about the way she handled that meeting, and I found myself wishing she’d say many of the same things you suggested, but today the Los Angeles Times says that Marjorie has left the restaurant so maybe the staff’s suffering, which I feel is her fault, will end soon.
While I certainly understand folks being very pissed off now, it seems wrong to direct that anger towards someone with such a good heart, and making this restaurant the target. They are not Coors after all. There are
many more deserving objects, people, establishments to focus on I think.
Thanks Lisa.
digg
Let’s face it, this person has been crushed by her church. And deep down, she knows she is wrong. Facing that reality will probably kill that woman, and her venerable business.
Jane has a new post up: Obama Shunning Lieberman
I know the protesters think it is the principle that matters but there are much more deserving targets for their wrath. The goal appears to be to instill fear in business owners tempted to support something like Prop 8. Fear is the same tactic the LDS and other haters use. There must be a better way.
To me this seems like targeting an individual with personal beliefs; she does not speak for the restaurant. She does not deserve to be singled out. Closing the restaurant where she works does not serve the citizens of Los Angeles.
It would be better in my opinion to call out the bad guys on this which are the Mormon Church, the Catholic Church and its Knights of Columbs, the Focus on Family bunch and the Scientologists.
This lady, who is entitled to her opinion, is not a mega-structure, and her donation did little to sway voters. She is a bystander. I support her right to make political donations as she wishes. She is not the enemy and neither is El Coyote. The statement has been made, and I hope the demonstrators move on to the real enemies of the people.
Save El Coyote. Dine there soon.
Man, LaNona – I’m with you. This seems like Republican ideological-purity tests all over again. That woman has a right to be wrong in her opinions and a right to make this donation as an individual.
What’s next – burn her at the stake? This needs to stop.
I’m in san diego, so it doesn’t really affect me, but Jeebus.
While I feel badly for the staff, Christoffersen could easily defuse the situation but will not. In my area, there is a local ice creamery (Leatherby’s) that gave far more to the Yes on 8 campaign, both in the individual owners’ names and in the company’s name. Guess where I’m never going for ice cream, and I am not gay, either. Businesses that wish to discriminate against patrons shouldn’t be let off the hook for sentimental reasons. Just because a few slaves were treated well by their owners didn’t make slavery any less abhorrent. Sentiment belongs nowhere near policy. It’s like freedom of speech. You have it, but you own the words and those words have consequences you own, too. Freedom of speech never meant freedom from consequences.
You know, for a $100 donation, I would have just called it even after the first protest. She knows how people feel. Except for one thing that was pointed out to me on the Great Orange Satan today.
http://www.meridianmagazine.co…..11war.html
This is a link to an article on Meridian Magazine, which is an LDS magazine, and the article is by a head honcho in Yes on 8, Gary Lawrence. A lot of this is going to sail right over non-Mormons’ heads, so let me try to explain. Basically, Lawrence compares those of us who have no problem with gay marriage to those premortal spirits who joined with Lucifer in the war in heaven. So, in other words, in Lawrence’s mind, if you don’t support Prop 8, you’re then supporting Satan. This is the kind of language that was being spread in LDS circles.
So my question is, how much can you really trust someone who gave $100 to a cause that was promoted by hateful rhetoric that compared supporters of gay marriage to followers of Satan? If Ms. Christoffersen was a regular church attender, I’m sure she heard similar overheated rhetoric coming over the pulpit. I mean, how much can you say you like gay people when, behind their backs, in the privacy of your own churches and your own websites, your people are posting dreck like this? Seriously?
(Which is why it’s Not In My Name anymore. I sent my resignation letter in last Sunday.)
Take no prisoners.