Californians Against Hate, the extraordinary activist group that produced the Grannie Blackwater ad and the Dishonor Roll of Prop 8 contributors, filed a complaint against the Mormon Church with the California Fair Political Practices Commission, the body that regulates campaign activity, alleging hundreds of thousands of dollars of unreported in-kind contributions to the Prop 8 campaign.
From the AP:
Fred Karger, the founder of Californians Against Hate, submitted the complaint to the enforcement division of the California Fair Political Practices Commission, the agency that regulates campaign activity.
Karger alleges that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ran out-of-state phone banks, produced commercials and provided other services that must be reported as contributions to the Proposition 8 campaign.
"Let’s be transparent here. If they are going to play in the political process, they need to abide by the rules like everyone else," he said.
Karger also notified the attorneys general of California and Utah, where the Mormon church is based.
According to campaign filings, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints itself contributed only $2,078.97 to the coalition that supported Prop 8 — as an in-kind donation. No other contributions are reported in the church’s name, although other churches and religious groups have reported hundreds of thousands of dollars in support of the measure.
The Fair Political Practices Commission has 14 days to respond to Karger’s allegations. The agency could decide to open an investigation, to warn the party named in the complaint or conclude no action is needed, according to commission spokesman Roman Porter.
The complaint (full text here) charges that the Mormon Church never reported these in-kind contributions to the YES campaign, and requests a full examination by the state agency:
· Church organized phone banks from Utah and Idaho
· Sending direct mail to voters
· Transported people to California over several weekends
· Used the LDS Press Office to send out multiple News Releases to promote their activities to nonmembers
· Walked precincts
· Ran a speakers bureau
· Distributed thousands of lawn signs and other campaign material
· Organized a “surge to election day”
· Church leaders travel to California
· Set up of very elaborate web sites
· Produced at least 9 commercials and 4 other video broadcasts all in support of Prop 8
· Conducted at least 2 satellite simulcasts over 5 Western states.
For your enjoyment, here’s another look at the Grannie Blackwater ad produced by Californians Against Hate. Grannie Blackwater’s not a Mormon, but this ad shows that this group plays hardball. I think their complaint, which clearly has merit, will hit a nerve too.





7 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Digg it right here if you like
Thanks!
In what respect is the LDS church, or any of these other churches, able to skirt the laws prohibiting nonprofit-type groups from political activities? If a church engages in politics, shouldn’t it lose its tax-exempt status?
Teddy – I know your commentary about the role of the Catholic Church in this is several threads ago, but this came out this morning and just ticked me off incredibly:
“A South Carolina Roman Catholic priest has told his parishioners that they should refrain from receiving Holy Communion if they voted for Barack Obama because the Democratic president-elect supports abortion, and supporting him “constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil.”
The Rev. Jay Scott Newman said in a letter distributed Sunday to parishioners at St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Greenville that they are putting their souls at risk if they take Holy Communion before doing penance for their vote.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..43804.html
Excuse me? ‘Refrain from taking communion’…or are you saying that you will refuse to give it to them? You are going to shame them in front of the church..at the rail?
If a supporter of Obama “Walked precincts…(and)…Set up of very elaborate web sites” would you want him punished for an unreported in-kind contribution?
A post by Be_Devine at Calitics, a gay man speaking about the Prop 8 stuff, noted that the Humane Society is the same kind of 501(c)3 organization as the LDS, and no one seems to have a problem with the HS putting a bunch of money into an animal rights proposition on the CA ballot:
The law for 501(c)3 non-profits — religious or secular — is clear that issue advocacy and education is fine while candidate endorsement is not. It’s akin to the general campaign finance law distinction between issue-advertising and candidate advertising. (The “substantial part” test, referenced above, is a way of trying to see that people don’t set up front groups that are spending all of their money on lobbying and elections, rather than on true nonprofit activities.)
This is issue advocacy/education, and thus protected. I find it offensive, wrong-headed, and screwed up theologically on many grounds, but it’s not illegal.
That being said, if the LDS isn’t playing by the rules when it comes to reporting in-kind contributions under the law, that’s a much different thing.
I saw that last night and it is totally out of line. What if you vote for a pro war candidate? Isn’t that the same?
This is abuse of faith. It also violates the precept of free will. It is also increeeedibility myopic. It is only going to turn people away. Horrible message to American Catholics.
Another priest tried this (in Colorado I think) a couple of years ago. Didn’t work out so well as I recall.
But neither of these tax-exempt groups is engaging in education or issue advocacy. They’re politicking. The proposition in question was to enact a law, not to debate an issue. If proposition 8 were a nonbinding resolution giving a sense of the state, then paid advertisements, direct mail, phone banks, etc. would be advocacy of an issue. But since Prop 8 was citizen-initiated legislation, it enters into the realm of political contributions just as it would if it were between two political candidates. To suggest that prop 8 is somehow unrelated to politics is preposterous. The state or the Federal Government should investigate whether the LDS Church has acted improperly–as they famously did with the NAACP–and whether the church should have its tax-exempt status revoked.