John McCain, according to a revelatory article in The New Republic, was almost certainly the source for illegal leaks during the Keating Five investigation — leaks that, if proven, would have been cause for his expulsion from the United States Senate for perjury. Additionally, according to a report by Sam Stein in today’s Huffington Post, John McCain lied to the Keating Five investigators about the extent of his family’s financial ties to Charles Keating. These lies could also have been cause for his fellow Senators to expel McCain from their ranks, had they been discovered at the time.
How did John McCain escape expulsion from the Senate? Leaking details of the investigation, lying under oath about those leaks, and lying to investigators about the details of one’s family’s business dealings with Charles Keating are certainly valid reasons for being expelled from the Senate.
First, the leaks from the Senate Ethics Committee investigation. Sahil Mahtani reports in The New Republic (my bold):
Yet the Ethics Committee’s was not the only investigation into the scandal. There were two other probes at the time that got barely any public attention–both of which largely focused on McCain himself. These were probes into illicit leaks about the proceedings of the Ethics Committee–leaks that repeatedly benefited McCain and hurt his Keating Five colleagues. One of those senators described the leaks at the time as a "violation of ethical behavior at least as serious as anything of which we senators have been accused."
The leaks, if they were coming from a senator, were also illegal. All five senators–including McCain–had testified under oath and under the U.S. penal code that the leaks did not come from their camps. The leaks were also prohibited by rules of the Senate Ethics Committee; according to the rules of the Senate, anyone caught leaking such information could face expulsion from the body. These, then, were not the usual Washington disclosures: Discovered, they could have stopped the career of any Washington politician in his tracks.
The two investigations into the leaks suggested McCain’s involvement but were officially inconclusive. New evidence, obtained in recent weeks, again points back to the McCain camp. The investigator of those leaks now says that he does not doubt that they came from McCain or his team. A reporter who possessed evidence in the Keating case now says he believes that McCain was the source and got away with it. Finally, a senator who has emerged as a key backer of McCain’s presidential campaign turns out to have authored a letter stating flatly that McCain was the source of the damning leaks. Put together, a large record of evidence now points in the direction of Senator McCain. Far from McCain’s reputation of putting "country first," these leaks depict a formidable politician willing to go through great lengths to maintain his standing. More than McCain’s relationship with Keating, it is the story of the Keating investigation leaks that voters should know.
Second, the untruths McCain actually told the Keating Five investigators about his family’s business dealings with Charles Keating. Sam Stein reports:
But this is not be the only instance in which McCain defied the rules of the Senate when seeking to absolve himself of any wronging in the Keating affair. Public records in Arizona reveal that the Senator was also dishonest in discussing the extent of financial transactions he and his family had with the disgraced Savings and Loans chief.
In a three-and-a-half hour interview with investigators on February 13, 1990, McCain told the Ethics Committee that "other than the Fountain Square project [a property deal in which Keating and McCain's family were jointly invested] there were no other financial dealings between him or his family and ACC [American Continental Corporation]."
This, it seems, was not true.
Before this campaign ends, John McCain must answer these new questions about the Keating Five investigation. Did he thwart it by illegal leaks? Did he lie to investigators? Did he escape expulsion from the Senate by subterfuge and dissembling?
Did John McCain put country first? Or did he put John McCain first, as always?





72 Comments
Spotlight




Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Advanced search
Dugg right here! You can too.
And Cindy McCain MUST reveal her complete tax records. Just how much and for how long were the financial ties…and just how many actions has John McCain kept hidden that has benefitted his heiress, millionaire wife?
I would also like to know exactly how much the McCains will benefit from extending the Bush tax cuts.
That’s a fair question, isn’t it? Certainly if obsessing over John Edwards’ haircut bill all winter is a big deal, Cindy’s tax savings are worth our knowing.
I’m looking at the Jeremiah Wright ad on my teevee right now.
I marvel that it’s better to be a crook in this country than it is to use your right to free speech and criticize it.
It’s really too bad John McCain has no control over those ads. I’m sure if he did have the power to take them off the air, he would do so, because he’s such an honorable man and has always been so.
Not.
Hello again everyone!
Come on now. McCain is a Republican and a conservative. It is always “What’s in it for me?” with them.
So how many legislators eggs-akkley got canned for leaking during the Lewinsky investigation? Wasn’t the K5 ‘investigation’ merely a ‘practice run’?
hey teddy. hey jane. hey doc, cinnamonape.
this mccain guy sure is a scumbag, yes?
and its okay if you are a republican.
where on the tv?
The good news: if all goes well, McShame will be honorably going down in flames in a mere two days’ time.
Always. Throughout his career. Born on third base with a sense of entitlement and thinks he is owed a home run (sort of like the current squatter).
the wright ads will defeat Obama in VA, PA and OH — and maybe in the election
no one cares about the Keating Five — although of course it is a real story — but one consequence of Obama choosing to not go after McCain’s character is that these stories were never covered
they’re running here in Indiana – don’t know which other states…
Please be right.
Taking his reputation with him. He shredded whatever flimsy illusions of honor might have protected him during this campaign.
Not to hear the pundits tell it. I’ve heard Brooks and Broder laud him recently for not having played the “race card.”
I’m figuring McSlime will come out, say, mid-day on Tuesday and ask that the PAC stop running the Rev Wright ads.
Just read that the Jackson, Ms Clarion-Ledger endorsed Obama – did someone say the south is not changing and that we should write it off?
Did you hear who it endorsed in the senate race? A close contest…
Yes, but Brooks and Broder are…what was that word, again…? …fuckwits.
Can’t remember where I read that they would save $750,000,000 next year…
No kidding.
Of course when they make statements like that nobody calls them on it. Kind of like watching Brokaw interview Fred Thompson this morning. Are all the people with last names which start with the letter B in the tank for McCain?
They obviously have been watching a different election than I have. McCrazy has run the most racist campaign since George Wallace (though he is nowhere near in Wallace’s league on that).
And isn’t that revolting?
I was almost starting to like Tweets.
Nah. Sometime Wednesday afternoon sounds about right.
That he is, BFL, that he is.
And for any media mavens tuning in, he always has been. This is not a new McCain you see in the 2008 campaign, as these self-serving leaks and lies from the Keating Five investigation make quite clear.
It was ever thus.
Any restraint McCain has shown (compared to Wallace) in making race an issue has been more than compensated by his supporters.
Please don’t denigrate people about mental disabilities.
Thank you.
bullshit. in my view.
Same demographic.
Had to look it up – they endorsed the Dem – Musgrove
Excellent article Teddy!!!
I would have thought so, until Obama’s lack of personal attacks in the debates resulted in a rise in his numbers and a slackening in McCheese supporters enthusiasm.
Folks are over Rove and his ways.
I am not sure about folks having moved past Rove, but certainly think that events have overtaken McCain and not been kind.
Senator Dennis DeConcin did an radio interview locally about how McCain threw him under the bus…… how McCain did everything to save himself ….
I knew from the outset it would be that way and that it would reach a fever pitch by the election. Still disturbing to actually witness that kind of bigotry. I take great comfort in the knowledge that despite all that, our candidate is going to win and probably by a fairly wide margin.
McCain would throw his mother under the bus if it would get him what he wants.
She’s pretty feisty, I think (hope) he might lose that contest.
Yep. I am part of a round table discussion on race and gender in the current election sponsored by the University Multicultural Alliance. Should have plenty to talk about. I am the only “switch hitter” on the lineup as I have specialties in both.
Hmmm. Campaign Silo apparently does not show emoticons.
In response to ratfood – *g*
Obama & Moveon have been running ads here in AZ…. Howard Dean will be doing a run through the state tomorrow starting in Tucson….
some PAC has been running the Rev Right POC (piece of crap) and right now there is an Obama ad running…..
Thanks.
There’s a fellow over on a companion blog who inspired me, who’s said this about McCain: he’s the same old McCain. I needed to go after this as soon as I saw it this morning. McCain’s been given a pass on K-5, and it needs to stop.
Now.
We are getting lots of Obama ads and a couple from the Dems, as well as one from the RNC, but nothing from the McCain campaign itself. Interesting as we seem to be competitive this year (though generally leaning McCain).
The American people have gotten to see and know Obama — and they know he’s not the person portrayed in the Wright ads. But has McCain denounced them? Has he? Nope, and neither has Miss Wasilla.
They like them, and hope the ads will help them win.
Hell, the dirtier the better as far as they are concerned. All they care about is that they have some minimal deniability.
107-year old South Carolina woman votes for Obama.
Slimy stuff. Yuck.
katymine, that’s wonderful!
(hope all is well with you?)
That is so cool. I’m certain she never thought she’d see this in her lifetime. I’m 60 years younger and never thought I would.
Have a splendid evening all. We are entering the home stretch…
Slimy, and never resolved.
The Senate should take this matter up and expel the dirty gambler. Lies and perjury never heal.
Well the birthday girl is heading off to bed….. btw I bought myself a present…… a new HDTV…… because the old one finally died today….
Nite everyone……
goodnight, dear
I agree with you. I also think that we ARE seeing the real McCain, the lying, racist, bigot, nasty, and contemptible John McCain. That has been his true face for all of his life – it has never changed. The one that everyone thought was the nice guy is a mask that he puts on when it is convenient. The mask slips when he calls his wife nasty names, when he physically pushes MIA/POW wives in wheelchairs around, his cursing at his Senate colleagues, etc. There’s a reason his flyboy pals called him McNasty. And his Academy peers.
Keep that guy away from the White House and the red button!
Never happen, unfortunately. Too much dirty laundry floating around the Senate and everyone is afraid theirs might come out.
I’m amazed at how cool and gentlemanly Obama has been, considering how much there is on McCain. I’m surprised that The Economist came out with this right now instead of earlier, although constant news makes it hotter perhaps.
Night katymine. Happy b’day!
sweet dreams!*
fresh threadiness now being served at the mothership
Local News says McCain will be here tomorrow….. McCain has to campaign in Arizona…… HOLY smokes….
I have seen a couple of MSM stories that he could actually lose Arizona. *g*
The early vote:
Obama 47%
McCain 42%
Nite again
Ah! My tee vee just died last week too. I bought it to see the first Irak war, in color. No replacement yet, except the leftover Zenith from upstairs (teens long gone). Hello All!
Sirs, you seem to forget one important fact in all of this nonsense about what ethical violations Senator McCain may or may not have committed on behalf of his good personal friend Charles Keating, and that is this:
For over five long year, John McCain was not able to “leak” anything to anybody, because he was a Prisoner Of War in Vietnam! He didn’t have media access, nor a telephone, or even any personal staff. It was these conditions that led him to invent the Blackberry, much in the same way that Tony Stark invented the Iron Man suit.
So my friends, before you go criticizing him, remember that he fought for his country. He crashed planes and gave up information under torture – for his country. Dumped his first wife for his country. And is now running for President for his country. Because his country needs him to do these things.
Think I will head out as well. Take care all.
nite doc
Good one.
And welcome, unless I’ve just never seen your handle hereabouts.
Suzanne’s the one to ask if you’ve any questions.
Reality check, please. Not going to happen. In fact I doubt the media (other than MSNBC, maybe) will run with this story with only one day left.
Couldn’t the New Republic have rushed this piece out a week or two ago, when it might have done some good?
I don’t doubt that McCain is guilty as sin, but nothing in your bolded portion counts as evidence. The investigators believe that McCain is guilty? Opinion, not admissible. Besides, no kidding? An investigator thinks someone is guilty? When has an investigator not thought he knew who was guilty? And a Senator says McCain is guilty? Hearsay, not admissible.