Comments on: Obama on Rachel Maddow, Part I http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2008/10/30/obama-on-rachel-maddow/ Politics for liberal newsgeeks Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:47:29 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: allan http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2008/10/30/obama-on-rachel-maddow/#comment-17415 allan Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:08:16 +0000 http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2008/10/30/obama-on-rachel-maddow/#comment-17415 <p>The only problem is that a “working majority for change”<br /> will include</p> <p>0 Republicans (all moderate Republicans were defeated years ago)</p> <p>and</p> <p>0 Bush Dogs (all of whom I hope will have their *sses primaried in 2010).</p> <p>So what is the upside of not knocking the Republicans?<br /> Keeping David Broder and Bob Kerrey happy?<br /> I am not optimistic.</p> The only problem is that a “working majority for change”
will include

0 Republicans (all moderate Republicans were defeated years ago)

and

0 Bush Dogs (all of whom I hope will have their *sses primaried in 2010).

So what is the upside of not knocking the Republicans?
Keeping David Broder and Bob Kerrey happy?
I am not optimistic.

]]>