acorn1.thumbnail.jpgFor a minute, forget the difference between voter fraud and registration fraud and the history of ACORN-bashing as voter suppression.

Has anyone stopped to consider whether the Republican National Congressional Committee’s allegations against ACORN make any sense? It seems not.

1. ACORN wants more poor people to vote. The more eligible people sign up to vote, the better, as far as ACORN is concerned. There is no shortage of eligible but unregistered voters.

2.  ACORN pays people to gather signatures.

3. ACORN gives signature gatherers a daily quota to ensure that they are actually registering real poor people who aren’t already signed up, instead of goofing off. 

4. Some signature gatherers allegedly fabricated voter registrations and/or knowingly signed up the same person multiple times in order to defeat ACORN’s quota system.

5. Voter registration fraud is fraud against ACORN. If these allegations are true, some unscrupulous signature gatherers are getting paid to register voters and not doing so. You would think the NRCC would be delighted to see people stealing from ACORN and ignoring real, unregistered poor people.

The NRCC is claiming that ACORN is committing voter fraud. In fact, the alleged offenses constitute registration fraud, of the type described above. Voter fraud is when one person somehow gets more than one vote. Nobody is going to show up and vote as "Mickey Mouse." Registering to vote twice with the same information won’t enable anyone to vote twice. ACORN has no reason to encourage phony signature gathering. On the contrary, the fake and double registrations are cover for the fact that signature gatherers aren’t registering voters. 

"It is very difficult to ascribe any other motive to the activities of ACORN other than to swamp the system with registration cards," Republican National Committee Chief Counsel Sean Cairncross told the Washington Post. Can anyone think of why ACORN would pay good money to swamp the voting system with registration cards to nowhere?