Comments on: Palin Unable to Discuss Any Supreme Court Case, Except Roe

By: Lindsay Beyerstein

Lindsay Beyerstein — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:19:05 +0000

I wouldn’t expect her to know Ledbetter v. Goodyear, naturally.

By: cinnamonape

cinnamonape — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:06:12 +0000

Or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.....onnecticut ">Griswold vs. Connecticut on Contraception and Privacy

http://www.talkorigins.org/faq.....ansas.html">Epperson vs. Arkansas and http://www.talkorigins.org/faq.....llard.html">Edwards vs. Aguillar On Evolution

Or one that should be reala easy to remember because of their names http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore ">Bush vs. Gore

Ladys’ a maroon!

By: cinnamonape

cinnamonape — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:59:28 +0000

Nor did she even know any of the cases that involved Alaska while she was Governor, one decided just this summer.

Exxon vs. Baker

Or here’s a real simple one for her to recall

Alaska vs. The United States

Even Bush recalled the Dred Scot case (though he utterly discombulated its meaning).

By: RAMA

RAMA — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:01:24 +0000

Not even Marberry vs. Madison? Munn vs. Illinois? Plessy vs. Ferguson? Brown vs. the Board of Education? She would have flunked my high school civics class.

By: KayInMaine

KayInMaine — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:34:23 +0000

Palin also just discovered Alaska was part of America and not Canada as she had always thought. She’s a little slow on these things!

By: bgrothus

bgrothus — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:04:36 +0000

That’s the only case that matters to her and her constituency.